Introduction
Cardiac disease of pregnancy encompasses a broad arena of pathologies. Many cardiac diseases during pregnancy are under investigation, and many others, which are still not understood, require further inquiry. Some of these diseases may be exacerbations of preexisting conditions that the pregnant woman may already have, or they may develop a new disease process that presents because of the complex hormonal changes and physiology of pregnancy. Preexisting conditions that can predispose pregnant women to cardiovascular disease include hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and congenital heart disease.[1] Regardless, cardiac disease of pregnancy is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality and has been cited to be present in between 1% to 4% of all pregnancies.[2] Although a significant risk is involved with such pregnancies, clinicians can successfully treat the majority of these incidents if early detection and careful follow-up are a part of routine care.
Etiology
Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Search engine and full access to all medical articles
10 free questions in your specialty
Free CME/CE Activities
Free daily question in your email
Save favorite articles to your dashboard
Emails offering discounts
Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care
Etiology
The etiology of cardiovascular diseases in pregnancy varies according to the specific underlying pathology. Various cardiovascular conditions may be encountered during pregnancy. Cardiomyopathy during pregnancy has multiple proposed mechanisms. Commonly cited theories include viral myocarditis, autoimmune processes, hemodynamic instability, and microchimerism, among others.[3] Risk factors associated with cardiomyopathy in nonpregnant individuals persist throughout pregnancy and the postpartum period, with potential for increased myocardial susceptibility during these phases. Relevant contributors include alcohol abuse, doxorubicin exposure, and substance misuse, eg, cocaine and methamphetamines.[4]
Coronary artery disease in pregnancy shares a similar etiology with ischemic heart disease in nonpregnant women. Major risk factors include hypertension, hyperlipidemia, hypertriglyceridemia, diabetes mellitus, obesity, smoking, and immobility.[5] These factors collectively increase the likelihood of atherosclerotic disease and subsequent ischemic events during pregnancy.
Pregnancy-associated myocardial infarction shares the same traditional risk factors as coronary artery disease.[6] Additional hypothesized contributors include pregnancy-related conditions (eg, preeclampsia and eclampsia), which may further predispose affected individuals to myocardial infarction. Valvular disease during pregnancy often worsens due to pregnancy-related hemodynamic changes, although a direct causal role of pregnancy in newly diagnosed valvular disorders remains uncertain.
Epidemiology
The frequency of cardiac disease in women remains incompletely defined, and current evidence does not clearly determine whether incidence differs between developed and underdeveloped countries. Available data suggest that at least 0.2% of pregnancies are complicated by cardiac disease.[7] Reported estimates rise as high as 4% in some studies.[8] Inclusion of hypertensive disorders further increases this proportion, given that hypertensive conditions occur in up to 8% of pregnancies.[8]
Pathophysiology
Physiologic changes during pregnancy play a central role in the development and progression of several cardiac disease processes. These adaptations may begin as early as 5 weeks of gestation, and their magnitude and trajectory vary among individuals.[9] Placental attachment to the uterine wall triggers hormonal release and subsequent maternal physiologic changes. These changes are predominantly hemodynamic and counter-regulatory, while preserving vascular homeostasis and maintaining the new mean arterial pressure of pregnancy.[10]
Cardiac output increases by approximately 20% to 50%, with changes detectable within the first 5 weeks of gestation and progressive elevation through late pregnancy. Increased stroke volume of approximately 25% during the first trimester contributes substantially to this rise, making pregnancy particularly challenging for individuals with preexisting cardiac disease. Patients with conditions, eg, cardiomyopathy, may fail to adequately compensate for this increased hemodynamic load and may develop complications, including pulmonary edema and volume overload states.[11] Heart rate increases by approximately 15% to 30% during the first trimester, further augmenting cardiac output.
Systemic vascular resistance decreases by up to approximately 30% during pregnancy. This reduction reflects decreased vascular responsiveness to angiotensin II and norepinephrine, along with increased release of vasodilatory mediators, eg, prostaglandins and nitric oxide.[12][13][12] Blood pressure demonstrates a mild early decline, with diastolic values decreasing more prominently than systolic values in early pregnancy. Blood pressure commonly normalizes or increases later in gestation.
Collectively, these physiologic and hormonal adaptations are hypothesized to contribute to decompensated cardiac states in pregnancy, including cardiomyopathy, congenital heart disease, and valvular disorders. In addition, structural cardiac remodeling occurs during pregnancy, with enlargement of both atria and both ventricles by the end of gestation.[14] Left ventricular mass increases by up to 50% by the third trimester, accompanied by eccentric hypertrophy and increased septal thickness.[15] Many of these structural and functional changes partially reverse within 6 to 8 months postpartum.[16] In conditions such as peripartum cardiomyopathy, these profound adaptations likely contribute to disease exacerbation, although no definitive mechanism explains the increased vulnerability in affected individuals.[17] Proposed explanations include concurrent myocarditis, autoimmune mechanisms, and familial predisposition. Animal models also suggest a potential role for VEGF dysregulation and impaired angiogenesis.[18]
Preexisting valvular disorders, including mitral stenosis, mitral regurgitation, and aortic stenosis, may worsen during pregnancy due to chamber enlargement, valvular dilation, and increased intravascular volume. These changes contribute to a volume-overloaded state that increases the risk of morbidity and mortality, including respiratory compromise and impaired tissue perfusion.
History and Physical
Careful differentiation between normal physiologic cardiovascular adaptations of pregnancy and pathologic cardiac changes remains essential to avoid misinterpretation of symptoms and examination findings. Accurate distinction ensures timely diagnostic evaluation and appropriate management of true cardiac disease while preventing unnecessary workup for expected pregnancy-related changes. Please see StatPearls' companion resource, "Physiology, Pregnancy," for further information.
Clinical History
Accurate history taking remains essential for diagnosing cardiac conditions during pregnancy. Clinical features that raise suspicion for cardiac disease include:
- Fatigue
- Shortness of breath
- Dyspnea on exertion
- Paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea
- Orthopnea
- Increasing edema
- Chest pain or angina
- Lightheadedness
- Syncope
- Personal or familial history of heart disease, especially in pregnancy
Physical Examination
Physical examination findings that may support cardiac pathology include:
- Tachypnea
- Tachycardia
- Hypotension
- Cyanosis
- Clubbing
- Jugular venous distension
- Rales
- Ascites
- Hepatomegaly
- Peripheral edema
- S3 and S4
- Hepatojugular reflux
- Prominent a and v waves
- Shifted apical impulse laterally to the midclavicular line
- Gallop rhythm
Many of these clinical findings may also occur in normal pregnancy, creating diagnostic complexity for clinicians attempting to differentiate physiologic adaptations from pathologic cardiac disease.[19] Careful integration of both history and physical examination findings remains critical for accurately distinguishing normal pregnancy-related changes from underlying cardiac conditions.
Evaluation
Evaluation of cardiac disease during pregnancy often requires an advanced diagnostic approach. Initial laboratory assessment typically includes a complete blood count (CBC), a comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP), and a urinalysis, which may provide important clues to underlying pathophysiologic processes. An elevated white blood cell count may support evaluation for inflammatory cardiac conditions (eg, myocarditis or myocardial infarction). Serum creatinine measurement may indicate recent or ongoing hypoperfusion. Liver enzyme abnormalities may suggest congestive hepatopathy, similar to nonpregnant populations. Urinalysis findings of proteinuria may assist in identifying preeclampsia. Additional laboratory testing, including brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), may provide diagnostic value, with reported physiologic increases of up to 2-fold during pregnancy.[20] Patients with overt peripartum cardiomyopathy typically demonstrate higher BNP levels compared with those without this condition.
Electrocardiography may demonstrate findings comparable to cardiovascular disease in nonpregnant individuals. Normal physiologic cardiac changes during pregnancy include leftward cardiac rotation with mild left axis deviation. Pregnancy-related chamber dilation increases susceptibility to dysrhythmias, including atrial premature beats, supraventricular tachycardias, and ventricular premature beats, while ventricular tachyarrhythmias occur less commonly.[21][22] Ischemic processes may produce ST-segment elevation or depression, T-wave inversion, or Q-wave formation. Nonspecific ST-segment and T-wave changes occur in up to 14% of pregnancies.[23]
Echocardiography plays a central role in evaluating suspected cardiac disease during pregnancy. Physiologic findings may include chamber enlargement, mild physiologic aortic, mitral, and tricuspid regurgitation, and valvular dilation.[24] Clinical significance depends on the correlation between echocardiographic findings and patient presentation, as no definitive thresholds distinguish normal from abnormal pregnancy-related changes. Cardiomyopathy may demonstrate exaggerated septal thickening, increased end-diastolic posterior wall thickness, and eccentric hypertrophy.[25] Peripartum cardiomyopathy diagnosis may be supported by an ejection fraction below 45% and/or M-mode fractional shortening below 30%, along with an end-diastolic dimension greater than 2.7 cm/m².[26] Myocardial ischemia or infarction may present with regional wall motion abnormalities. Pericardial effusion may occur during pregnancy and remain physiologic in small volumes; however, findings, eg, hypotension, jugular venous distension, or pulsus paradoxus, warrant prompt echocardiographic evaluation for cardiac tamponade.
Treatment / Management
No empiric regimens exist for the prevention of cardiac disease in pregnancy. Individuals with a prior history of cardiac disease require heightened vigilance and continuation of their prepregnancy therapeutic regimen. When existing regimens include teratogenic agents, replacement with safer alternatives under the guidance of a qualified clinician becomes necessary. Management of cardiac disease in pregnancy varies according to the underlying condition and requires an individualized treatment approach. The following outlines common cardiac disorders in pregnancy and corresponding recommended therapeutic strategies.
Ventricular Dysfunction
Ventricular dysfunction in pregnancy frequently involves patients with pre-existing heart failure, whether previously recognized or undiagnosed before pregnancy, depending on functional status. Physiologic adaptations of pregnancy, including increased heart rate and expanded circulating volume, may overwhelm compensatory mechanisms, particularly during the second trimester when hemodynamic demands peak. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers, commonly used in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, remain contraindicated due to teratogenic effects, including renal dysplasia, renal failure, oligohydramnios, and intrauterine growth restriction.[27] Alternative therapy with hydralazine and nitrates provides a comparable hemodynamic effect. Beta-blockers may be continued, with preference for cardioselective agents (eg, metoprolol). Diuretics may also be used when clinically indicated.[28](B3)
Peripartum Cardiomyopathy
Peripartum cardiomyopathy, defined as dilated cardiomyopathy occurring during the last 4 weeks of pregnancy or up to 5 months postpartum, follows a treatment approach similar to ventricular dysfunction in pregnancy.[29] After delivery, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker therapy may be reintroduced.
Mitral Stenosis
Mitral stenosis carries substantial morbidity and mortality risk during pregnancy due to its obstructive physiology.[30] No pharmacologic agents reverse the underlying lesion; however, beta-blockers remain the primary medical therapy, reducing transmitral gradient.[31] Diuretics provide symptomatic relief in heart failure manifestations.(B2)
Aortic Stenosis
Although aortic stenosis in pregnancy is less common, this condition is often more challenging to treat, presenting a more complex management challenge during pregnancy. No medications modify disease progression or serve as definitive therapy. Beta-blockers demonstrate limited efficacy in reducing transvalvular gradients compared with their effect in mitral stenosis. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors remain contraindicated. Diuretic use requires caution due to the potential for reduced diastolic filling and a further decline in cardiac output.
Tachyarrhythmias
Tachyarrhythmias require individualized management based on maternal and fetal considerations. Agents considered relatively safe during pregnancy include adenosine, verapamil, digoxin, flecainide, and beta-blockers.[32] Amiodarone should be avoided due to its association with fetal hypothyroidism.[33]
Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection represents an uncommon cause of acute myocardial infarction, with increased incidence during pregnancy. Clinical suspicion should remain high in pregnant patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome symptoms.[34] Dissection most commonly involves the left main or left anterior descending artery.[35] Proposed mechanisms include hormonal influences, pregnancy-related hemodynamic stress that weakens the arterial wall, and inflammatory infiltrates.[36][37][36](B3)
Diagnosis relies on coronary angiography. Management lacks standardization due to rarity, with reported approaches including medical therapy, coronary artery bypass grafting, and heart transplantation.[38][39][38] Coronary artery bypass grafting may represent the preferred strategy in cases involving multiple-vessel dissection, left main involvement, or failure of percutaneous coronary intervention.[40]
Acute Coronary Syndrome
Acute coronary syndrome and myocardial infarction remain uncommon in pregnancy but demonstrate increasing incidence with rising maternal age at conception. Advancing age contributes to the accumulation of risk factors, eg, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension. Although fluoroscopic exposure during pregnancy presents risks, percutaneous coronary intervention remains indicated, given the high mortality associated with untreated acute coronary syndromes, with maternal shielding using lead protection. Thrombolytic therapy remains an alternative but requires close monitoring due to reported complications, including maternal hemorrhage, spontaneous abortion, subchorionic hematomas, and uterine bleeding.[41][42][41] Drug-eluting stents should be avoided when possible due to prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy requirements, which complicate obstetric management, particularly in cesarean delivery.[43](A1)
Commonly used cardiovascular medications and pregnancy risk categories include morphine (Category C), beta-blockers (metoprolol Category B; atenolol Category C), calcium channel blockers (Category C), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (Category C in first trimester and Category D in second and third trimesters), statins (Category X), unfractionated heparin (Category C), low-molecular-weight heparin (Category B), aspirin (Category C), and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (eptifibatide and tirofiban Category B; abciximab Category C).[43]
Patients presenting with blood pressure greater than 160/100 require antihypertensive therapy with close outpatient or inpatient monitoring, depending on severity.[44] Agents demonstrated to be safe in pregnancy include oral methyldopa, oral or intravenous labetalol, oral nifedipine, oral or intravenous hydralazine, and intravenous nicardipine.
| Pause and Reflect |
A 30-year-old woman who is 28 weeks pregnant presents with progressive shortness of breath, increasing lower-extremity edema, orthopnea, and reduced exercise tolerance. She has a history of cardiomyopathy diagnosed before pregnancy. Vital signs reveal mild tachycardia, and physical examination demonstrates jugular venous distension, bibasilar rales, and an S3 gallop. The patient reports that she assumed these symptoms were normal pregnancy-related changes and delayed seeking care. As a member of the healthcare team, you must determine whether her presentation reflects expected physiologic adaptations of pregnancy or worsening cardiac disease.
|
Differential Diagnosis
Cardiac diseases of pregnancy need evaluation as new processes or exacerbations of previous disease processes. With any cardiac disease process detected in pregnancy, the preexisting pathology must be ruled out, including prior dilated cardiomyopathy, restrictive cardiomyopathy, hypertensive obstructive cardiomyopathy, ischemic heart disease, or previous valvular disorders.
Prognosis
The World Health Organization (WHO) has established a modified classification of maternal cardiovascular risk, which is used as a tool to evaluate risk status for pregnant females with various cardiovascular conditions (see Table. World Health Organization Classification of Maternal Cardiovascular Risk). The risk classifications are as follows:
- I: No Identifiable elevated risk of maternal morbidity and mortality
- II: Mildly elevated maternal mortality; moderate elevation of morbidity
- III: Substantially elevated risk in maternal mortality; severe elevation of morbidity. For these patients, close follow-up is recommended to be initiated with cardiac specialists. Cardiac monitoring should continue regularly throughout pregnancy and should also continue after pregnancy.[45]
- IV: Extremely elevated risk of maternal mortality; severe elevation of morbidity. Pregnancy is contraindicated for these individuals. If pregnancy is to occur, termination should be recommended. However, if the individual chooses to pursue pregnancy, she should be monitored closely as a class III individual.[45]
Table. World Health Organization Classification of Maternal Cardiovascular Risk
| Class | Associated Conditions |
| I |
|
| II |
|
| III |
|
| IV |
|
Heart disease during pregnancy represents a high-risk clinical condition; however, favorable outcomes frequently occur when patients receive consistent monitoring and regular follow-up. Prognosis varies according to the specific cardiac disorder, with certain conditions carrying substantially greater morbidity and mortality than others. Peripartum cardiomyopathy occurs in approximately 1 in 2,289 live births. Approximately 75% of affected women experience complete recovery of normal ventricular function.[46] Despite the potential severity of this condition, recovery of cardiac function remains common with appropriate management and follow-up.
Among patients with congenital heart disease, regurgitant valvular lesions generally carry lower morbidity than stenotic lesions.[47] Overall maternal mortality remains very low in this population. One study evaluating 90 individuals with congenital heart disease reported no maternal deaths.[48] However, the same analysis identified pulmonary edema in 17% of patients and cardiac events, predominantly nonsustained tachyarrhythmias, in 12%. A meta-analysis involving more than 2,000 pregnancies reported a spontaneous abortion rate of 15% and an 8% incidence of congenital heart disease among offspring.[49]
Acute coronary syndrome and myocardial infarction remain uncommon during pregnancy, with reported estimates ranging from 1 to 2 cases per 35,000 deliveries.[43] In one study evaluating pregnancy outcomes among patients with coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndromes, adverse obstetric events occurred in 16% of pregnancies, while adverse neonatal outcomes occurred in 30%.[50] Reported maternal mortality reached 7.3%, with the greatest risk observed among patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome during the third trimester.[51]
Complications
Complications related to cardiac disease in pregnancy include:
- Excess weight gain during pregnancy
- Preeclampsia
- Preterm birth
- Intrauterine growth restriction
- Hemorrhage
- Placental abruption
- Gestational diabetes
- Progressive heart failure
- Maternal or fetal death
Consultations
Consultations that are typically required to assist in the management of cardiac disease in pregnancy should include:
- High-risk obstetrician
- Cardiology
- Perinatologist
Deterrence and Patient Education
Patients should receive a clear explanation of their cardiac condition from the time of diagnosis and should remain actively involved in shared decision-making throughout the course of care. Detailed discussions regarding potential maternal and fetal risks support informed decision-making and promote adherence to recommended evaluation and treatment strategies.
Beginning at conception, pregnant individuals should receive counseling regarding risk factors associated with cardiac disease during pregnancy. Important risk factors include drug use, alcohol abuse, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, pre-existing heart disease, myocarditis, and a familial history of cardiac disease associated with pregnancy. Early education regarding these risk factors may facilitate timely recognition of symptoms, appropriate risk modification, and prompt medical evaluation when concerns arise.
Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes
Cardiac disease in pregnancy affects approximately 1% to 4% of pregnancies and remains a significant contributor to maternal morbidity and mortality. Physiologic cardiovascular adaptations of pregnancy—including increased cardiac output, elevated heart rate, decreased systemic vascular resistance, and structural cardiac remodeling—can exacerbate pre-existing cardiac conditions or precipitate new disease processes such as peripartum cardiomyopathy, valvular disease, arrhythmias, coronary artery disease, and pregnancy-associated myocardial infarction. Clinical presentation often overlaps with normal pregnancy symptoms, including fatigue, dyspnea, edema, and tachycardia, which may delay recognition of pathology. Accurate diagnosis requires careful history-taking, targeted physical examination, and appropriate diagnostic evaluation, including laboratory testing, electrocardiography, and echocardiography. Management depends on the specific condition and must balance maternal cardiovascular stability with fetal safety while avoiding teratogenic medications and addressing potential complications such as heart failure, preeclampsia, and preterm birth.
Interprofessional collaboration plays a critical role in optimizing outcomes for pregnant patients with cardiovascular disease. Physicians, including cardiologists and obstetric specialists, lead diagnostic evaluation, risk stratification, and development of individualized management plans. Primary care clinicians and advanced practitioners support early recognition of concerning symptoms, coordinate referrals, and monitor disease progression throughout pregnancy and the postpartum period. Nurses contribute through ongoing patient assessment, education, and monitoring for signs of clinical deterioration. Pharmacists assist in medication selection and dosing adjustments to ensure maternal benefit while minimizing fetal risk. Effective communication among team members promotes timely intervention, shared decision-making, and coordinated follow-up, reducing complications and improving maternal and fetal safety through integrated, patient-centered care.
References
Goldstein SA, Ward CC. Congenital and Acquired Valvular Heart Disease in Pregnancy. Current cardiology reports. 2017 Aug 24:19(10):96. doi: 10.1007/s11886-017-0910-6. Epub 2017 Aug 24 [PubMed PMID: 28840470]
Elkayam U, Goland S, Pieper PG, Silverside CK. High-Risk Cardiac Disease in Pregnancy: Part I. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2016 Jul 26:68(4):396-410. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.05.048. Epub [PubMed PMID: 27443437]
Ntusi NB, Mayosi BM. Aetiology and risk factors of peripartum cardiomyopathy: a systematic review. International journal of cardiology. 2009 Jan 9:131(2):168-79. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.06.054. Epub 2008 Aug 22 [PubMed PMID: 18722678]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceWeintraub RG, Semsarian C, Macdonald P. Dilated cardiomyopathy. Lancet (London, England). 2017 Jul 22:390(10092):400-414. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31713-5. Epub 2017 Feb 10 [PubMed PMID: 28190577]
Pathak LA, Shirodkar S, Ruparelia R, Rajebahadur J. Coronary artery disease in women. Indian heart journal. 2017 Jul-Aug:69(4):532-538. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2017.05.023. Epub 2017 Jun 12 [PubMed PMID: 28822527]
James AH, Jamison MG, Biswas MS, Brancazio LR, Swamy GK, Myers ER. Acute myocardial infarction in pregnancy: a United States population-based study. Circulation. 2006 Mar 28:113(12):1564-71 [PubMed PMID: 16534011]
Ashrafi R, Curtis SL. Heart Disease and Pregnancy. Cardiology and therapy. 2017 Dec:6(2):157-173. doi: 10.1007/s40119-017-0096-4. Epub 2017 Jul 5 [PubMed PMID: 28681178]
European Society of Gynecology (ESG), Association for European Paediatric Cardiology (AEPC), German Society for Gender Medicine (DGesGM), Regitz-Zagrosek V, Blomstrom Lundqvist C, Borghi C, Cifkova R, Ferreira R, Foidart JM, Gibbs JS, Gohlke-Baerwolf C, Gorenek B, Iung B, Kirby M, Maas AH, Morais J, Nihoyannopoulos P, Pieper PG, Presbitero P, Roos-Hesselink JW, Schaufelberger M, Seeland U, Torracca L, ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines. ESC Guidelines on the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy: the Task Force on the Management of Cardiovascular Diseases during Pregnancy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). European heart journal. 2011 Dec:32(24):3147-97. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr218. Epub 2011 Aug 26 [PubMed PMID: 21873418]
Chapman AB, Abraham WT, Zamudio S, Coffin C, Merouani A, Young D, Johnson A, Osorio F, Goldberg C, Moore LG, Dahms T, Schrier RW. Temporal relationships between hormonal and hemodynamic changes in early human pregnancy. Kidney international. 1998 Dec:54(6):2056-63 [PubMed PMID: 9853271]
Lof M, Olausson H, Bostrom K, Janerot-Sjöberg B, Sohlstrom A, Forsum E. Changes in basal metabolic rate during pregnancy in relation to changes in body weight and composition, cardiac output, insulin-like growth factor I, and thyroid hormones and in relation to fetal growth. The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2005 Mar:81(3):678-85 [PubMed PMID: 15755839]
Sciscione AC, Ivester T, Largoza M, Manley J, Shlossman P, Colmorgen GH. Acute pulmonary edema in pregnancy. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2003 Mar:101(3):511-5 [PubMed PMID: 12636955]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceMcFaul PB, Dornan JC, Lamki H, Boyle D. Pregnancy complicated by maternal heart disease. A review of 519 women. British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 1988 Sep:95(9):861-7 [PubMed PMID: 3191059]
Selzer A. Risks of pregnancy in women with cardiac disease. JAMA. 1977 Aug 22:238(8):892-3 [PubMed PMID: 577983]
Valensise H, Novelli GP, Vasapollo B, Borzi M, Arduini D, Galante A, Romanini C. Maternal cardiac systolic and diastolic function: relationship with uteroplacental resistances. A Doppler and echocardiographic longitudinal study. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2000 Jun:15(6):487-97 [PubMed PMID: 11005116]
Pandey AK, Banerjee AK, Das A, Bhawani G, Kumar A, Majumadar B, Bhattacharya AK. Evaluation of maternal myocardial performance during normal pregnancy and post partum. Indian heart journal. 2010 Jan-Feb:62(1):64-7 [PubMed PMID: 21180037]
Estensen ME, Beitnes JO, Grindheim G, Aaberge L, Smiseth OA, Henriksen T, Aakhus S. Altered maternal left ventricular contractility and function during normal pregnancy. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2013 Jun:41(6):659-66. doi: 10.1002/uog.12296. Epub [PubMed PMID: 23001841]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceMorales A, Painter T, Li R, Siegfried JD, Li D, Norton N, Hershberger RE. Rare variant mutations in pregnancy-associated or peripartum cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2010 May 25:121(20):2176-82. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.931220. Epub 2010 May 10 [PubMed PMID: 20458009]
Arany Z, Foo SY, Ma Y, Ruas JL, Bommi-Reddy A, Girnun G, Cooper M, Laznik D, Chinsomboon J, Rangwala SM, Baek KH, Rosenzweig A, Spiegelman BM. HIF-independent regulation of VEGF and angiogenesis by the transcriptional coactivator PGC-1alpha. Nature. 2008 Feb 21:451(7181):1008-12. doi: 10.1038/nature06613. Epub [PubMed PMID: 18288196]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceWander G, van der Zande JA, Patel RR, Johnson MR, Roos-Hesselink J. Pregnancy in women with congenital heart disease: a focus on management and preventing the risk of complications. Expert review of cardiovascular therapy. 2023 Jul-Dec:21(8):587-599. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2023.2237886. Epub 2023 Jul 20 [PubMed PMID: 37470417]
Hameed AB, Chan K, Ghamsary M, Elkayam U. Longitudinal changes in the B-type natriuretic peptide levels in normal pregnancy and postpartum. Clinical cardiology. 2009 Aug:32(8):E60-2. doi: 10.1002/clc.20391. Epub [PubMed PMID: 19455566]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceLehtoranta L, Valta M, Aantaa R, Perheentupa A. [Supraventricular tachycardia during pregnancy]. Duodecim; laaketieteellinen aikakauskirja. 2016:132(2):173-5 [PubMed PMID: 26939491]
Nakagawa M, Katou S, Ichinose M, Nobe S, Yonemochi H, Miyakawa I, Saikawa T. Characteristics of new-onset ventricular arrhythmias in pregnancy. Journal of electrocardiology. 2004 Jan:37(1):47-53 [PubMed PMID: 15132369]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceBoyle DM, Lloyd-Jones RL. The electrocardiographic ST segment in pregnancy. The Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of the British Commonwealth. 1966 Dec:73(6):986-7 [PubMed PMID: 5927791]
Campos O, Andrade JL, Bocanegra J, Ambrose JA, Carvalho AC, Harada K, Martinez EE. Physiologic multivalvular regurgitation during pregnancy: a longitudinal Doppler echocardiographic study. International journal of cardiology. 1993 Jul 15:40(3):265-72 [PubMed PMID: 8225661]
Li J, Umar S, Amjedi M, Iorga A, Sharma S, Nadadur RD, Regitz-Zagrosek V, Eghbali M. New frontiers in heart hypertrophy during pregnancy. American journal of cardiovascular disease. 2012:2(3):192-207 [PubMed PMID: 22937489]
Hibbard JU, Lindheimer M, Lang RM. A modified definition for peripartum cardiomyopathy and prognosis based on echocardiography. Obstetrics and gynecology. 1999 Aug:94(2):311-6 [PubMed PMID: 10432149]
Boix E, Zapater P, Picó A, Moreno O. Teratogenicity with angiotensin II receptor antagonists in pregnancy. Journal of endocrinological investigation. 2005 Dec:28(11):1029-31 [PubMed PMID: 16483184]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceThorne S, MacGregor A, Nelson-Piercy C. Risks of contraception and pregnancy in heart disease. Heart (British Cardiac Society). 2006 Oct:92(10):1520-5 [PubMed PMID: 16973809]
Sliwa K, Hilfiker-Kleiner D, Petrie MC, Mebazaa A, Pieske B, Buchmann E, Regitz-Zagrosek V, Schaufelberger M, Tavazzi L, van Veldhuisen DJ, Watkins H, Shah AJ, Seferovic PM, Elkayam U, Pankuweit S, Papp Z, Mouquet F, McMurray JJ, Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Peripartum Cardiomyopathy. Current state of knowledge on aetiology, diagnosis, management, and therapy of peripartum cardiomyopathy: a position statement from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on peripartum cardiomyopathy. European journal of heart failure. 2010 Aug:12(8):767-78. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfq120. Epub [PubMed PMID: 20675664]
Silversides CK, Colman JM, Sermer M, Siu SC. Cardiac risk in pregnant women with rheumatic mitral stenosis. The American journal of cardiology. 2003 Jun 1:91(11):1382-5 [PubMed PMID: 12767443]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceDesai PA, Tafreshi J, Pai RG. Beta-blocker therapy for valvular disorders. The Journal of heart valve disease. 2011 May:20(3):241-53 [PubMed PMID: 21714412]
Adamson DL, Nelson-Piercy C. Managing palpitations and arrhythmias during pregnancy. Heart (British Cardiac Society). 2007 Dec:93(12):1630-6 [PubMed PMID: 18003696]
Pieper PG. Use of medication for cardiovascular disease during pregnancy. Nature reviews. Cardiology. 2015 Dec:12(12):718-29. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2015.172. Epub [PubMed PMID: 26585398]
Bac DJ, Lotgering FK, Verkaaik AP, Deckers JW. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection during pregnancy and post partum. European heart journal. 1995 Jan:16(1):136-8 [PubMed PMID: 7737212]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceKoul AK, Hollander G, Moskovits N, Frankel R, Herrera L, Shani J. Coronary artery dissection during pregnancy and the postpartum period: two case reports and review of literature. Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions. 2001 Jan:52(1):88-94 [PubMed PMID: 11146532]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceChan N, Premawardhana D, Al-Hussaini A, Wood A, Bountziouka V, Kotecha D, Swahn E, Palmefors H, Pagonis C, Lawesson SS, KÄ…dziela J, Garcia-Guimarães M, Alfonso F, Escaned J, Macaya F, Santás M, Cerrato E, Maas AHEM, Hlinomaz O, Bogale N, Cortese B, Cheng M, Bolger A, Hussain ST, Samani NJ, Knight M, Cauldwell M, Adlam D. Pregnancy and Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Lessons From Survivors and Nonsurvivors. Circulation. 2022 Jul 5:146(1):69-72. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.059635. Epub 2022 Jun 3 [PubMed PMID: 35656808]
Heefner WA. Dissecting hematoma of the coronary artery. A possible complication of oral contraceptive therapy. JAMA. 1973 Jan 29:223(5):550-1 [PubMed PMID: 4739140]
Hayes SN, Tweet MS, Adlam D, Kim ESH, Gulati R, Price JE, Rose CH. Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2020 Aug 25:76(8):961-984. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.05.084. Epub [PubMed PMID: 32819471]
Kachurovskaia OS. [Diagnosis of the extrathoracic forms of sarcoidosis]. Vrachebnoe delo. 1987 Sep:(9):71-3 [PubMed PMID: 3424780]
Lane JE, Cartledge RG, Johnson JH. Successful surgical treatment of spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Current surgery. 2001 May:58(3):316-318 [PubMed PMID: 11397493]
Fu D, Park BJ, Rao G, Makaryus J. Severe COVID-19 post pregnancy complicated by acute thromboemboli resulting in ST-elevation myocardial infarction - A case report. Perfusion. 2025 Jan:40(1):251-255. doi: 10.1177/02676591241228173. Epub 2024 Jan 17 [PubMed PMID: 38233341]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceMartillotti G, Boehlen F, Robert-Ebadi H, Jastrow N, Righini M, Blondon M. Treatment options for severe pulmonary embolism during pregnancy and the postpartum period: a systematic review. Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH. 2017 Oct:15(10):1942-1950. doi: 10.1111/jth.13802. Epub 2017 Sep 12 [PubMed PMID: 28805341]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceRoth A, Elkayam U. Acute myocardial infarction associated with pregnancy. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2008 Jul 15:52(3):171-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.03.049. Epub [PubMed PMID: 18617065]
Phipps E, Prasanna D, Brima W, Jim B. Preeclampsia: Updates in Pathogenesis, Definitions, and Guidelines. Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN. 2016 Jun 6:11(6):1102-1113. doi: 10.2215/CJN.12081115. Epub 2016 Apr 19 [PubMed PMID: 27094609]
Denoble AE, Goldstein SA, Wein LE, Grotegut CA, Federspiel JJ. Comparison of severe maternal morbidity in pregnancy by modified World Health Organization Classification of maternal cardiovascular risk. American heart journal. 2022 Aug:250():11-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2022.04.009. Epub 2022 May 5 [PubMed PMID: 35526569]
Amos AM, Jaber WA, Russell SD. Improved outcomes in peripartum cardiomyopathy with contemporary. American heart journal. 2006 Sep:152(3):509-13 [PubMed PMID: 16923422]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidencevan Hagen IM, Roos-Hesselink JW. Pregnancy in congenital heart disease: risk prediction and counselling. Heart (British Cardiac Society). 2020 Dec:106(23):1853-1861. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-314702. Epub 2020 Jul 1 [PubMed PMID: 32611675]
Khairy P, Ouyang DW, Fernandes SM, Lee-Parritz A, Economy KE, Landzberg MJ. Pregnancy outcomes in women with congenital heart disease. Circulation. 2006 Jan 31:113(4):517-24 [PubMed PMID: 16449731]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceDrenthen W, Pieper PG, Roos-Hesselink JW, van Lottum WA, Voors AA, Mulder BJ, van Dijk AP, Vliegen HW, Yap SC, Moons P, Ebels T, van Veldhuisen DJ, ZAHARA Investigators. Outcome of pregnancy in women with congenital heart disease: a literature review. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2007 Jun 19:49(24):2303-11 [PubMed PMID: 17572244]
Burchill LJ, Lameijer H, Roos-Hesselink JW, Grewal J, Ruys TP, Kulikowski JD, Burchill LA, Oudijk MA, Wald RM, Colman JM, Siu SC, Pieper PG, Silversides CK. Pregnancy risks in women with pre-existing coronary artery disease, or following acute coronary syndrome. Heart (British Cardiac Society). 2015 Apr:101(7):525-9. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306676. Epub 2015 Jan 6 [PubMed PMID: 25564557]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceLadner HE, Danielsen B, Gilbert WM. Acute myocardial infarction in pregnancy and the puerperium: a population-based study. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2005 Mar:105(3):480-4 [PubMed PMID: 15738011]