Introduction
A mass casualty incident (MCI) is defined as an event that overwhelms the local healthcare system, where the number of casualties vastly exceeds the local resources and capabilities in a short time. Any MCI can rapidly exhaust available resources not only for the MCI but also for the hospital's normal day-to-day tasks. Each hospital should institute a surge plan in preparation for anticipated, progressive, insidious (notice events), and sudden-onset (no-notice events) disasters occurring within the community.[1][2][3][4][5] When responding to an MCI, the type of MCI must be identified. Categories include:
- Planned (sporting event)
- Conventional, which usually have some level of recurring frequency (transportation incidents, burn, and severe weather events)
- Chemical, biological, radiological
- Nuclear agents from an unintentional or accidental release or act of terrorism
- Catastrophic health events (nuclear detonation, major explosion, a major hurricane, pandemic influenza, or others).
The keys to successfully managing the chaos of a fast-paced, moving MCI can be summarized as the 5 S's: scene safety assessment, scene size-up, send information, scene set-up, and START (simple triage and rapid treatment).
Clinical Significance
Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Search engine and full access to all medical articles
10 free questions in your specialty
Free CME/CE Activities
Free daily question in your email
Save favorite articles to your dashboard
Emails offering discounts
Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care
Clinical Significance
Activation of an MCI
Those deemed capable of declaring an MCI activation may differ among different county and state protocols within the United States. However, it is fairly universal that Incident Command and local hospitals have the authority to declare an MCI. Most regions are flexible in this regard, allowing public safety agencies with jurisdiction over incident scene management, emergency medical services (EMS) personnel who arrive first on scene, Central Medical Emergency Dispatch, hospitals, and regional council staff to declare an MCI and take immediate action.[2][6][7][8][9]
Communications and Incident Management
Flexible, integrated communication and information systems are key to successfully allocating resources and organizing an effective response to an MCI. A command center should be organized and equipped with multiple radios tuned to separate frequencies, with an effective priority scan frequency lock-out. Each scene commander should have headsets, microphones, clipboards, and checklists to provide continuous feedback on scene dynamics.
On Scene Control
The extent of an MCI is not solely dependent on the total number of created potential patients but is exacerbated by other complicating factors coined MCI multipliers. MCI multipliers can include limited scene access, biohazard contamination, self-deploying responders not equipped for or experienced in the current scenario, and a lack of on-scene or surrounding hospital resources. AJ Heightman, Editor-in-Chief of JEMS, developed a table of multipliers that affect MCIs that should be identified and managed as early as possible in the course of an MCI, and are listed below:
- Physical location and access/egress complications
- Several access points and distance between exits on a highway
- Location, speed, and density of traffic
- The weather or roadway conditions
- Time of day
- Staffing levels
- Massive debris field
- Other simultaneous incidents drain on available resources.
- Location of specialty teams and resources
- Ambulances are unfamiliar with a district’s MCI operational procedures
- Ambulances from another system arriving on the scene or self-dispatching
- Hospital backlogs, closures, or lack of resources or capabilities
- Communication coverage gaps or inability to communicate with mutual response resources
- Failure to establish incident command, divisions, or groups early enough
- Lack of scene vests or identification of triage, treatment, or transportation areas
- Late or improper access directions or staging instructions to incoming units
- Complicating factors, such as ongoing crashes, gunfire, or explosions
To combat these roadblocks, early-on-scene role establishment is essential.
Hierarchical Approach
Response and management of an MCI depend on hierarchy. The Incident Commander within the National Incident Management System controls operations across the entire MCI. Where available, Interprofessional Regional Medical Coordinating Systems meet to coordinate patient transfers during surges when demand at the nearest facilities exceeds their resources. Regional Medical Coordinating Systems coordinate hospital resources based on the number of emergent and non-emergent patient surges each surrounding facility can accommodate.
Once on the scene, the EMS Branch Director or the Incident Command oversees all on-scene operations (safety, scene size-up, communications, and so forth), which should be established early. While law enforcement is responsible for maintaining the security of the scene, the Safety Officer is responsible for assessing current and potential hazards and ensuring the safety of responding crews. The radio officer works directly with incident command to provide frequent scene reports and coordinates communications with the transportation officer and local hospitals to assess their capacity to meet ongoing needs. The Medical Supervisor must oversee and coordinate the scene's triage, treatment, and transport sectors; they are responsible for creating patient flow and managing patient resource allocation. The Triage Officer coordinates patient flow to the transportation area based on the clinical condition designated by the triage team. They are in charge of performing a final scene sweep to ensure that no rescued patient is left without triage. The Treatment Officer establishes the treatment zone and allocates supplies. They are responsible for anticipating resource needs and updating the Transportation Officer on the numbers of green, yellow, red, and black triage designations and on when those numbers change as patients’ clinical conditions worsen. The Transportation Officer is responsible for patient tracking, transportation, assistance from local responding units, directions, and hospital designations based on resource availability and needs.
Mutual aid ambulance services, first responder units, and EMS personnel provide transportation and evacuation of MCI patients as dispatched per the established regional policy and communications center. Individual EMS personnel are prohibited from self-dispatching to the scene. The first available responder squad on the scene should be responsible for gauging the extent of the catastrophe, providing a scene report, and alerting nearby hospitals to determine resource and bed availability at those facilities. To quickly and efficiently gauge the extent of the MCI, the Massachusetts Department of Public Health recommends employing the “METHANE” mnemonic, which is as follows:
- M: Major incident declaration
- E: Exact location; the precise location of the incident, staging area, if applicable
- T: Type of incident: the nature of the incident, including how many vehicles, buildings, and so forth are involved
- H: Hazards, both present and potential
- A: Access; best route for emergency services to access the site or obstructions and bottlenecks to avoid
- N: Number of casualties, dead and injured, on the scene
- E: Emergency services; which services are already on scene and which are still required (Mass Casualty Incident trailer, Regional EMS Council staff, Task Force)
(Adapted from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health Emergency Medical Services Mass Casualty Incident Plan)
Scene identification vests should be distributed to the IC, Safety Officer, Staging Officer, Medical Supervisor, Radio Officer, Triage Officer, Treatment Officer, Transportation Officer, and all rescue and responder personnel, branding them in their roles so they can be easily identified by the current on-scene personnel, newly incoming crews, and MCI patients. In the event of a terrorist-based MCI, ballistic tactical vests should be highly considered for distribution.
On the scene, determine safe areas that can serve as a staging area, a specialty vehicle loading zone, a triage zone, and a treatment zone, removed from the accident scene or “hot zone,” and secure these areas under police command. In addition, a morgue area that is out of the way yet easily accessible for temporary body disposal and later removal from the scene should be created. To continuously direct patient triage without requiring a worker to remain in the staging area, stage the triage zones with color-coded green, yellow, and red tarps to delineate minor, delayed, and immediate care zones, respectively. This tactic frees up available first responder resources and allows the remaining walking wounded to locate emergency medical personnel.
Specifically, concerning MCIs created by a mass shooting, more than 250 people were killed over 114 years from 1999 to 2013. In response, the American College of Surgeons and the Federal Bureau of Investigation in Hartford, Connecticut, gathered to create an efficient set of critical actions to be employed on the scene to maximize the survivability of mass shootings. These critical actions were summarized within the mnemonic THREAT:
- T: Threat suppression
- H: Hemorrhage control
- RE: Rapid extrication to safety
- A: Assessment by medical providers
- T: Transport to definitive care
Adapted from Fire/Emergency Medical Services Department Operational Considerations and Guide for Active Shooter and Mass Casualty Incidents, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
Triage
The allocation of resources is based on the difficult decisions of patient triage. The START adult algorithm constitutes the basis of MCI triage. In total, there are 4 categories in START: minor (green), delayed (yellow), immediate (red), and expectant (black). All patients should be tracked with START Triage Tags. The color designating the patient’s clinical condition is the color remaining after tearing off the other colors that do not match the patient’s condition. Persons who can be tagged green for minor injuries are known as the walking wounded: they have relatively minor injuries, are unlikely to deteriorate over days, and may be able to assist in their care. Those triaged to the delayed category are those with potentially serious and life-threatening injuries. However, these patients should be able to follow simple commands, have capillary refill of less than 2 seconds, and have a respiratory rate of less than 30 breaths per minute. Their status is not expected to deteriorate significantly over several hours, so transport can be delayed accordingly. Persons triaged in the immediate category require immediate transportation and medical attention within minutes for survival (up to 60 minutes) for compromised airway, breathing, and circulation. These patients meet immediate care criteria if they have respirations over 30 breaths per minute, signs of active hemorrhage, capillary refill over 2 seconds, or have altered mental status in which they cannot follow simple commands. Expectants are those who are dead or inevitably dying and are triaged as black. A jaw thrust maneuver may be implemented to determine if spontaneous respirations resume. If not, palliative medications only should be provided.
Inventory
Inventory of resources is as paramount as resource allocation. Inventory methods should be adaptable and scalable. Inventory lists can be created on paper or electronic spreadsheets on the scene or in the hospital setting. The Incident Resource Inventory System provided by the Federal Emergency Management Agency at no cost is a standards-based information software tool that allows users to identify and inventory their resources, consistently with National Incident Management System resource typing definitions, for mutual aid operations based on mission needs and each resource’s capabilities, availability and response time, and share information with other agencies.
References
Lincoln EW, Freeman CL, Strecker-McGraw MK. EMS Incident Command(Archived). StatPearls. 2026 Jan:(): [PubMed PMID: 30521221]
Wehbi NK, Wani R, Yang Y, Wilson F, Medcalf S, Monaghan B, Adams J, Paulman P. A needs assessment for simulation-based training of emergency medical providers in Nebraska, USA. Advances in simulation (London, England). 2018:3():22. doi: 10.1186/s41077-018-0081-6. Epub 2018 Nov 23 [PubMed PMID: 30479842]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceLee HY, Lee JI, Kim OH, Lee KH, Kim HT, Youk H. Assessment of the disaster medical response system through an investigation of a 43-vehicle mass collision on Jung-ang expressway. Accident; analysis and prevention. 2019 Feb:123():60-68. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.11.004. Epub 2018 Nov 20 [PubMed PMID: 30468947]
Hart A, Nammour E, Mangolds V, Broach J. Intuitive versus Algorithmic Triage. Prehospital and disaster medicine. 2018 Aug:33(4):355-361. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X18000626. Epub [PubMed PMID: 30129913]
Gross IT, Coughlin RF, Cone DC, Bogucki S, Auerbach M, Cicero MX. GPS Devices in a Simulated Mass Casualty Event. Prehospital emergency care. 2019 Mar-Apr:23(2):290-295. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2018.1489018. Epub 2018 Aug 17 [PubMed PMID: 30118640]
Jain T, Sibley A, Stryhn H, Hubloue I. Comparison of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Technology-Assisted Triage versus Standard Practice in Triaging Casualties by Paramedic Students in a Mass-Casualty Incident Scenario. Prehospital and disaster medicine. 2018 Aug:33(4):375-380. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X18000559. Epub 2018 Jul 13 [PubMed PMID: 30001765]
Hart A, Chai PR, Griswold MK, Lai JT, Boyer EW, Broach J. Acceptability and perceived utility of drone technology among emergency medical service responders and incident commanders for mass casualty incident management. American journal of disaster medicine. 2017 Fall:12(4):261-265. doi: 10.5055/ajdm.2017.0279. Epub [PubMed PMID: 29468628]
Yu W, Lv Y, Hu C, Liu X, Chen H, Xue C, Zhang L. Research of an emergency medical system for mass casualty incidents in Shanghai, China: a system dynamics model. Patient preference and adherence. 2018:12():207-222. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S155603. Epub 2018 Jan 31 [PubMed PMID: 29440876]
Cummings C, Monti J, Kobayashi L, Potvin J, Williams K, Sullivan F. Ghost Attack: The East Providence Carbon Monoxide Mass Casualty Incident. Rhode Island medical journal (2013). 2018 Feb 2:101(1):26-27 [PubMed PMID: 29393307]