Back To Search Results

EMS Clinical Diagnosis Without the Use of a Thermometer

Editor: Scott Goldstein Updated: 3/22/2026 10:07:18 AM

Introduction

Prehospital clinical diagnosis by emergency medical services (EMS) personnel does not require a thermometer to detect increases or decreases in body temperature. Numerous etiologies can lead to fever (>39 °C or >100.4 °F), hypothermia (<35 °C or <95 °F), or both.

Common causes for fever and hypothermia include environmental exposure, endocrinologic disorders (hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, hypoglycemia, adrenal insufficiency), and infectious disease, with sepsis more likely when temperature derangements are present. Emergent causes of fever include sympathomimetic substances (eg, methamphetamine, cocaine, phencyclidine), withdrawal toxidromes (eg, benzodiazepine or alcohol withdrawal), drug effects (eg, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, serotonin syndrome), and exertional hyperthermia (eg, marathon running). Emergent causes of hyperthermia also include extensive skin disorders (burns, psoriasis, widespread rash), neurogenic shock with vasoregulation dysfunction, and medication-induced hypothermia (eg, benzodiazepines, β-blockers).

Baseline vital signs in EMS include pulse, respirations, skin color, skin temperature, skin condition, and blood pressure. These measurements comprise a critical component of the physical assessment. Skin temperature should be evaluated by tactile examination or, when able, thermometry. Assessment includes determining whether the skin feels cool, normal, warm, or hot. Clinical evaluation of tactile temperature demonstrates accuracy comparable to topical thermometry (eg, temporal), even in untrained personnel. Studies report a sensitivity of approximately 90% for parents’ tactile detection of childhood fever, with a specificity of approximately 50%. By comparison, oral thermometry demonstrates a sensitivity of approximately 55% and a specificity of approximately 98%.[1]

Regarding infectious causes of temperature abnormalities, multiple signs and symptoms can indicate associated contagious disease, including chills, rigors, sweats, and altered mental status. Symptoms specific to the infected body system (eg, cough in pulmonary infection, rash in skin infection, abdominal pain in appendicitis) should prompt EMS providers to suspect infection and include it in the differential diagnosis.

High suspicion for infectious disease facilitates timely patient treatment and reduces the risk of provider exposure. Although universal precautions apply to all patients, adherence to protocols improves when EMS personnel maintain a high index of suspicion. Proper patient history, clinical presentation, and physical examination support accurate identification of infectious disease. Early recognition of infectious disease substantially reduces mortality, particularly in sepsis.[2][3][4][5][6][7]

Issues of Concern

Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Get the answers you need instantly with the StatPearls Clinical Decision Support tool. StatPearls spent the last decade developing the largest and most updated Point-of Care resource ever developed. Earn CME/CE by searching and reading articles.
  • Dropdown arrow Search engine and full access to all medical articles
  • Dropdown arrow 10 free questions in your specialty
  • Dropdown arrow Free CME/CE Activities
  • Dropdown arrow Free daily question in your email
  • Dropdown arrow Save favorite articles to your dashboard
  • Dropdown arrow Emails offering discounts

Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care

Issues of Concern

Subjective assessment of elevated temperature and associated clinical findings is essential in EMS. Fever commonly produces nonspecific symptoms, including fatigue, subjective warmth, headache, malaise, anorexia, myalgias, nausea, and sweats or chills. Studies demonstrate that fatigue, subjective warmth, headache, and weakness occur most frequently during the febrile phase. The presence of at least 1 of these symptoms, combined with tactile skin temperature assessment, should raise suspicion for fever. Dehydration is rarely detected on initial examination in febrile patients despite correlation with the highest fever severity during the febrile phase.[8]

Pulse rate may increase in response to fever, dehydration, or shock. Pulse palpation provides an accurate rate and information regarding the adequacy of blood pressure and perfusion. An increase of approximately 10 bpm for each degree of temperature elevation helps determine whether tachycardia reflects fever or additional causes. Concern for severe infectious disease, particularly sepsis, should increase when tachycardia accompanies suspected infection. Shock can develop rapidly, and identification of infectious causes is necessary for definitive treatment. Patients receiving medications that affect heart rate, such as β-blockers and calcium channel blockers, may not develop tachycardia, so a normal heart rate does not exclude fever or infection.

Sepsis, particularly in older adults, can also produce bradycardia associated with end-organ failure. Endocrinologic abnormalities and toxidromes or withdrawal syndromes commonly present with pulse abnormalities corresponding to temperature derangements. Sympathomimetic exposure often produces suspected hyperthermia accompanied by tachycardia, tachypnea, and diaphoresis.

Respiratory rate may increase as a direct physiologic response to fever and decrease with hypothermia. Studies suggest that respiratory rate can increase by approximately 5 breaths/min per 1 °F elevation in core body temperature. Tachypnea warrants evaluation for respiratory distress, hypoxia, or ineffective ventilation. Fever or infection can also directly cause tachypnea.

The skin's color, temperature, and condition may indicate underlying thermoregulation abnormalities. Red, flushed faces are common in febrile children. Generalized or central erythema of the face and torso results from vascular dilation. Vasodilation functions as a feedback mechanism that reduces heat retention during fever. Tactile skin temperature examination demonstrates notable accuracy in studies. A patient or caregiver’s report of “hot to touch,” or EMS tactile assessment, should be documented and communicated to receiving medical providers.

Skin findings, including diaphoresis and erythema, may aid in the diagnosis of infectious disease. Diaphoresis and generalized erythema may increase as fever improves because these mechanisms promote heat dissipation. Infectious diseases commonly present with cutaneous rashes. Petechiae or purpura warrant particular concern because of possible vascular or platelet dysfunction or sepsis. Generalized exanthems may also accompany or indicate specific infectious conditions, such as measles or varicella.

Pale or cool extremities resulting from vasoconstriction during hypothermia, particularly without environmental exposure, may suggest infectious disease among other conditions. Decreased capillary refill may reflect dehydration or peripheral vasoconstriction. Peripheral cyanosis may also occur with vasoconstriction, particularly in very young patients. Peripheral vasoconstriction can prolong capillary refill and increase cyanosis while shunting blood from the extremities to critical central organs, including the brain, heart, lungs, and kidneys. Although not specific to fever or infectious disease, chills, shivering, piloerection ("goose bumps"), and altered mental status should increase suspicion for infection.

Blood pressure is a critical component in the assessment of infectious disease. Vascular dilation associated with fever can lower blood pressure and reduce perfusion to essential organs. Risk increases when dehydration or cardiac compromise is present, including medication effects. Hypotension may produce central nervous system dysfunction, decreased urine output, gastrointestinal impairment, and cyanosis. This constellation falls within the spectrum of sepsis and septic shock and represents a critical finding requiring immediate treatment.

In addition to fever, hypothermia is a critical finding in patients with high suspicion for infectious disease. Numerous studies associate hypothermia with increased mortality in sepsis. Assessment of respirations, skin findings, diaphoresis, and blood pressure allows EMS providers to identify both hypothermia and fever, supporting early recognition of sepsis.[9][10][11][12]

Clinical Significance

Safe EMS practice assumes a possible infectious disease when symptoms, history, or physician assessment suggest infection. Prehospital care requires the protection of the patient and EMS personnel and clear communication of the suspected diagnosis to the receiving facility. Thermometers are now frequently available to EMS personnel. Clinical assessment remains a critical component in the diagnosis of infectious diseases.

Evaluation of vital signs, including pulse, respiration, and blood pressure, should accompany a focused physical examination. Tactile skin temperature, color, and condition provide additional clinical information. Altered mental status, decreased cardiac function, and evidence of end-organ failure should increase concern for serious infectious disease or sepsis. Integration of patient history, symptom progression, and exposure history with early recognition of hypothermia or hyperthermia without a thermometer can improve patient outcomes.[13][14]

References


[1]

Kiekkas P, Aretha D, Tzenalis A, Stefanopoulos N. Diagnostic accuracy of oral thermometry for fever detection in adult patients: literature review and meta-analysis. Journal of clinical nursing. 2022 Mar:31(5-6):520-531. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15968. Epub 2021 Jul 18     [PubMed PMID: 34278635]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[2]

Gresham R. Hot stuff. Clinical thermometry has come a long way. Emergency medical services. 1993 Jul:22(7):57-61, 74     [PubMed PMID: 10127025]


[3]

van Rein EAJ, van der Sluijs R, Raaijmaakers AMR, Leenen LPH, van Heijl M. Compliance to prehospital trauma triage protocols worldwide: A systematic review. Injury. 2018 Aug:49(8):1373-1380. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.07.001. Epub 2018 Jul 3     [PubMed PMID: 30135040]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[4]

Hart A, Nammour E, Mangolds V, Broach J. Intuitive versus Algorithmic Triage. Prehospital and disaster medicine. 2018 Aug:33(4):355-361. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X18000626. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 30129913]


[5]

Reece RJ, Hughes M. Are Digital Oral Thermometer Readings Accurate in Adult Emergency Department Patients? Cureus. 2022 Feb:14(2):e22047. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22047. Epub 2022 Feb 9     [PubMed PMID: 35340476]


[6]

Rosenbloom E, Balis C, Jacobson D, Conway M, Cheng J, Kozer E. A Cross-Sectional Study on Subjective Fever Assessment in Children by Palpation: Are Fathers as Reliable as Mothers? Emergency medicine international. 2020:2020():3534267. doi: 10.1155/2020/3534267. Epub 2020 Feb 12     [PubMed PMID: 32104604]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[7]

Leung LY, Huang HL, Hung KK, Leung CY, Lam CC, Lo RS, Yeung CY, Tsoi PJ, Lai M, Brabrand M, Walline JH, Graham CA. Door-to-antibiotic time and mortality in patients with sepsis: Systematic review and meta-analysis. European journal of internal medicine. 2024 Nov:129():48-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2024.06.015. Epub 2024 Jul 20     [PubMed PMID: 39034174]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[8]

Kapoor M, Kumar N, Panda PK. The symptomatology of fever: A step towards qualitative definition of fever. Journal of family medicine and primary care. 2022 Oct:11(10):5990-6000. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_360_22. Epub 2022 Oct 31     [PubMed PMID: 36618218]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[9]

Fidacaro GA Jr, Jones CW, Drago LA. Pediatric Transport Practices Among Prehospital Providers. Pediatric emergency care. 2020 Nov:36(11):e632-e635. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001564. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 30106867]


[10]

Lumba-Brown A, Yeates KO, Sarmiento K, Breiding MJ, Haegerich TM, Gioia GA, Turner M, Benzel EC, Suskauer SJ, Giza CC, Joseph M, Broomand C, Weissman B, Gordon W, Wright DW, Moser RS, McAvoy K, Ewing-Cobbs L, Duhaime AC, Putukian M, Holshouser B, Paulk D, Wade SL, Herring SA, Halstead M, Keenan HT, Choe M, Christian CW, Guskiewicz K, Raksin PB, Gregory A, Mucha A, Taylor HG, Callahan JM, DeWitt J, Collins MW, Kirkwood MW, Ragheb J, Ellenbogen RG, Spinks TJ, Ganiats TG, Sabelhaus LJ, Altenhofen K, Hoffman R, Getchius T, Gronseth G, Donnell Z, O'Connor RE, Timmons SD. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guideline on the Diagnosis and Management of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Among Children. JAMA pediatrics. 2018 Nov 1:172(11):e182853. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.2853. Epub 2018 Nov 5     [PubMed PMID: 30193284]


[11]

Sundén-Cullberg J, Rylance R, Svefors J, Norrby-Teglund A, Björk J, Inghammar M. Fever in the Emergency Department Predicts Survival of Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Admitted to the ICU. Critical care medicine. 2017 Apr:45(4):591-599. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002249. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 28141683]


[12]

Bhavani SV, Semler M, Qian ET, Verhoef PA, Robichaux C, Churpek MM, Coopersmith CM. Development and validation of novel sepsis subphenotypes using trajectories of vital signs. Intensive care medicine. 2022 Nov:48(11):1582-1592. doi: 10.1007/s00134-022-06890-z. Epub 2022 Sep 24     [PubMed PMID: 36152041]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[13]

Vaittinada Ayar P, Delay M, Avondo A, Duchateau FX, Nadiras P, Lapostolle F, Chouihed T, Freund Y. Prognostic value of prehospital quick sequential organ failure assessment score among patients with suspected infection. European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine. 2019 Oct:26(5):329-333. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000570. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 30138252]


[14]

Kitahara O, Nishiyama K, Yamamoto B, Inoue S, Inokuchi S. The prehospital quick SOFA score is associated with in-hospital mortality in noninfected patients: A retrospective, cross-sectional study. PloS one. 2018:13(8):e0202111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202111. Epub 2018 Aug 16     [PubMed PMID: 30114203]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence