Introduction
Malignant hyperthermia is a hereditary pharmacogenetic disorder of skeletal muscle that classically presents as a hypermetabolic response to halogenated anesthetic agents or the depolarizing muscle relaxant succinylcholine. The condition is characterized by an early onset of hyperthermia, hypercarbia, muscular rigidity, and acidosis following exposure to triggering medications with potential complications of coagulopathy, rhabdomyolysis, acute kidney injury, and multiorgan failure.[1] Rapid administration of dantrolene can be lifesaving and should be immediately available wherever malignant hyperthermia triggering agents are utilized.[2]
Etiology
Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Search engine and full access to all medical articles
10 free questions in your specialty
Free CME/CE Activities
Free daily question in your email
Save favorite articles to your dashboard
Emails offering discounts
Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care
Etiology
Genetically susceptible individuals can have a malignant hyperthermia reaction in response to triggering agents such as halogenated anesthetic agents or succinylcholine and, more rarely, to stressors such as vigorous exercise and heat exposure, sometimes referred to as "awake malignant hyperthermia," as no anesthetic agents are involved.[3] Nitrous oxide and xenon, although they are inhaled anesthetics, are not halogenated and have not been implicated in malignant hyperthermia.[4]
Epidemiology
The exact incidence of malignant hyperthermia is unknown. Study results demonstrate that malignant hyperthermia occurs in about 1 in 100,000 adults and 1 in 30,000 children. Registry analyses from North America document ongoing cases with cardiac arrest and death despite modern practice.[5]
The incidence of malignant hyperthermia varies based on geographic region. In the United States, clusters of families susceptible to malignant hyperthermia are found in Wisconsin and the upper Midwest. The mortality rate is 3% to 5%, even with proper treatment. Malignant hyperthermia susceptibility is also associated with other disorders, including central core disease (a rare, nonprogressive myopathy characterized by hypotonia and weakness of proximal muscles) and King-Denborough syndrome (a rare myotonia associated with multiple distinct physical features).[6]
Early researchers described rare episodes of stress-induced "awake malignant hyperthermia." Later, Tobin described one of the most convincing cases of fatal, exercise-induced malignant hyperthermia in a 13-year-old boy in whom the causative RYR1 mutation was present and was later found to be present in his family members.[7] Malignant hyperthermia susceptibility has also been described in other species, particularly in swine, where much of the early research into the disease and its treatment originated.[8]
Pathophysiology
Malignant hyperthermia is an autosomal dominant genetic disorder characterized by skeletal muscle hypermetabolism following exposure to halogenated anesthetics, depolarizing muscle relaxants such as succinylcholine, or, occasionally, physiologic stressors. The gene encoding the ryanodine receptor RYR1 is the primary site of mutations linked to malignant hyperthermia. Other genetic loci, such as CACNA1S and STAC3, have been identified as causative of malignant hyperthermia.[3][9][10]
The uncontrolled release of calcium from the skeletal muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum leads to sustained muscle contraction. This sustained contraction depletes adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and dramatically increases oxygen consumption, carbon dioxide production, and heat production. The depletion of ATP leads to loss of membrane integrity and leakage of intracellular contents, including potassium, creatine kinase, and myoglobin, into the circulation.[11][12] Study results have shown the potential of a RyR1-selective inhibitor with superior solubility and rapid clearance to prevent and reverse malignant hyperthermia and heatstroke crises in multiple mouse models. Such research highlights the genetic mechanism of malignant hyperthermia and suggests the potential for additional clinical management options beyond dantrolene.[13]
History and Physical
Signs and symptoms of malignant hyperthermia include tachycardia, tachypnea, hypoxemia, hypercarbia, metabolic and respiratory acidosis, hyperkalemia, cardiac dysrhythmias, hypotension, skeletal muscle rigidity, and hyperthermia. The earliest signs of malignant hyperthermia are usually hypercarbia and tachycardia, resulting from increased carbon dioxide production. Malignant hyperthermia can occur at any time during the intraoperative and postoperative periods. Fulminant malignant hyperthermia reactions may present with only a few of the typical clinical signs, and a high index of suspicion for malignant hyperthermia is required to ensure a timely and accurate diagnosis and treatment.[14]
Susceptible patients can also exhibit masseter muscle spasm. If signs of hypermetabolism, such as metabolic and respiratory acidosis or an elevation in body temperature, accompany the muscle spasms, a diagnosis of malignant hyperthermia must be considered.[15] Use of a malignant hyperthermia clinical grading scale to support diagnosis during a crisis can also be useful. Priority is given to treatment over diagnosis to avoid the risk of a missed diagnosis.[16]
Evaluation
The gold standard for the laboratory diagnosis of malignant hyperthermia is the caffeine-halothane contracture test (CHCT), although genetic testing is rapidly advancing and may one day replace muscle biopsy. The CHCT involves exposing a sample of live muscle fibers to halothane and caffeine to determine the muscle response to halogenated anesthetics. Genetic testing for mutations in the RYR1 gene and other associated variants is becoming increasingly valuable as testing improves. Testing can be expensive and is only available in certain centers. Therefore, when presented with a patient for urgent or emergent surgery who has a history suggestive of a close relative who has had a malignant hyperthermia episode, anesthesiologists will usually provide a "nontriggering anesthetic," which is typically a variety of combinations of intravenous anesthetic agents.[3][17][18][19]
Treatment / Management
The critical element in the treatment of malignant hyperthermia is early administration of dantrolene. Once a malignant hyperthermia episode is suspected, all triggering agents must be discontinued, the patient should be hyperventilated with 100% oxygen, and non-triggering anesthetic agents should be utilized to end the surgery as soon as possible. Dantrolene at 2.5 mg/kg must be administered intravenously immediately, up to a maximum of 10 mg/kg, until the reaction subsides. In addition to administering dantrolene, attention must be paid to preserving renal function and correcting hyperthermia, acidosis, hypoxemia, and arrhythmias. Arrhythmias can be treated with antiarrhythmics, and renal function can be protected by maintaining a urine flow of at least 2 mL/kg/hr with furosemide to prevent acute tubular necrosis, a complication that can develop from precipitation of myoglobin released from skeletal muscle.[20]
Management includes the following key interventions:
- Discontinue the triggering agent.
- Call for additional assistance.
- Administer dantrolene 2.5 mg/kg until the reaction subsides, up to a maximum of 10 mg/kg.
- Increase ventilation to reduce end-tidal carbon dioxide.
- Initiate active cooling measures (cold intravenous fluids and ice packs to exposed surfaces).
- Treat arrhythmias (eg, amiodarone; avoid calcium channel blockers).
- Obtain laboratory studies including arterial blood gas analysis, electrolytes (with attention to potassium), serum and urine myoglobin, and a coagulation profile.
- Continue dantrolene at 1 mg/kg every 4 hours for 24 to 48 hours.
- Maintain urine output of 2 mL/kg/hr; note that each 20 mg vial of dantrolene sodium contains approximately 3 grams of mannitol, which may contribute to osmotic diuresis.
After initial stabilization, patients should be admitted to the intensive care unit for at least 24 hours to monitor for recrudescence (the return of symptoms following an initial abatement). Patients at the highest risk for recrudescence are those with greater muscle mass or prolonged anesthetic exposure (at least 150 minutes) before symptom onset.[21] Continued dantrolene therapy is recommended during this period. Improved outcomes depend on early recognition, prompt administration of dantrolene, and rapid initiation of active cooling to limit the rise in core temperature.[3][5](B2)
Prophylactic dantrolene is not recommended for malignant hyperthermia–susceptible patients.[22] Instead, prevention relies on the use of non-triggering anesthetics (avoiding halogenated volatile anesthetics and succinylcholine). The team should also prepare a halogenated volatile anesthetic-free anesthesia machine, use total intravenous anesthesia and nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockers, and ensure the immediate availability of dantrolene.[1][23]
Differential Diagnosis
Malignant hyperthermia shares clinical features with several hypermetabolic and neuromuscular disorders, particularly in the perioperative setting. Hyperthermia, tachycardia, acidosis, and muscle rigidity may overlap with other conditions, making early distinction essential to guide appropriate management. Careful attention to triggering exposures, time course, and associated laboratory findings helps differentiate malignant hyperthermia from its mimics.
Neuroleptic malignant syndrome presents with hyperthermia and rigidity but differs in pharmacologic trigger and underlying mechanism; susceptibility to one condition does not confer risk for the other.[24] Exertional heat stroke also demonstrates clinical overlap, and noninvasive phosphorus-31 magnetic resonance spectroscopy and in vitro testing suggest that a subset of patients may have malignant hyperthermia–like myopathy with sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium channel dysregulation.[25] Myotonias and periodic paralysis disorders may yield small contractures at low agonist doses on in vitro contracture testing, limiting specificity and not necessarily indicating a malignant hyperthermia genotype.[26] Additional considerations include sepsis, thyroid storm, pheochromocytoma, equipment or ventilation failure, serotonin syndrome, and iatrogenic overheating, each distinguished by clinical context, medication exposures, and laboratory evaluation.[3][27][28][29]
Prognosis
Prognosis in malignant hyperthermia depends on the timeliness of recognition and intervention, as early diagnosis and prompt treatment markedly reduce morbidity and mortality. Outcomes have improved substantially with increased clinician awareness and the availability of dantrolene, allowing many patients to achieve full recovery when therapy is initiated without delay. Despite appropriate management, severe complications may still occur, particularly in cases with delayed diagnosis or advanced physiologic derangement. Rhabdomyolysis, acute kidney injury, coagulopathy, and multiorgan failure remain important contributors to adverse outcomes. The overall mortality rate is now less than 5% in settings with timely access to treatment.[30]
Complications
Complications of malignant hyperthermia arise from the sustained hypermetabolic state and rapid skeletal muscle breakdown, leading to widespread physiologic derangement. Severity correlates with the duration of untreated symptoms and the extent of the hyperthermia, acidosis, and electrolyte imbalance, particularly hyperkalemia. Major complications include rhabdomyolysis with subsequent myoglobinuria and acute kidney injury, which can progress to renal failure.
Cardiac complications include arrhythmias, cardiac arrest, and heart failure. Coagulopathy, including disseminated intravascular coagulation, may develop in severe cases. Additional complications include pulmonary edema, neurologic injury due to hyperthermia and hypoxia, multiorgan failure, and death.[31]
Postoperative and Rehabilitation Care
Postoperative care following malignant hyperthermia requires close monitoring due to the risk of recrudescence and delayed complications. Patients should be cared for in an intensive care unit for at least 24 hours, with continued surveillance of vital signs, end-tidal carbon dioxide, electrolytes, renal function, and markers of muscle breakdown. Recrudescence occurs in approximately 20% of cases, typically within a mean of 13 hours after initial stabilization.
Risk factors for recrudescence include greater muscle mass, a substantial rise in core temperature, and prolonged exposure to triggering agents prior to symptom onset.[21] Ongoing treatment with dantrolene (1 mg/kg every 4 to 6 hours for 24 to 48 hours) is recommended to reduce the risk of recurrence, alongside supportive care to maintain adequate urine output and prevent complications such as acute kidney injury.
Deterrence and Patient Education
Patient education plays a critical role in preventing future malignant hyperthermia episodes and ensuring patient safety during subsequent medical care. Because malignant hyperthermia is an inherited pharmacogenetic disorder, affected individuals and their families should receive counseling regarding genetic risk, the potential for susceptibility in first-degree relatives, and the importance of formal evaluation when appropriate. Patients should be advised to inform all healthcare professionals of their history or suspected susceptibility and to consider medical alert identification to facilitate rapid recognition in emergency settings. The Malignant Hyperthermia Association of the United States provides comprehensive educational resources, guidance on testing and prevention, and a 24-hour hotline at (800) MH-HYPER or (800) 644-9737 for clinicians and patients seeking immediate assistance or further information.
Pearls and Other Issues
Dantrolene
Dantrolene inhibits the release of calcium ions from the sarcoplasmic reticulum by antagonizing the ryanodine receptors, which lessens the excitation–contraction coupling of muscle cells. Dantrolene is currently the only specific medication used for treating a malignant hyperthermia crisis. Dantrolene is available in 2 formulations that differ in concentration and in the amount of sterile water required to reconstitute each vial. One formulation is available in 20 mg vials, which must be reconstituted with 60 mL of sterile water per vial, while the other is available in 250 mg vials, which must be reconstituted with 5 mL of sterile water per vial.
Regardless of which formulation of dantrolene is administered, a dose of 2.5 mg/kg is recommended to treat a malignant hyperthermia episode. Dantrolene is a highly lipophilic drug with low water solubility, making its reconstitution in sterile water challenging. The newer formulation that combines nanosuspension technology with a lyophilized formulation results in much faster reconstitution of the drug, which can greatly shorten time to treatment and may be especially useful in locations where only 1 provider is available to treat the patient.
Additional doses of dantrolene may be necessary to adequately treat malignant hyperthermia-triggering events; a dose of 1 mg/kg every 4 to 6 hours is recommended for the first 24 to 48 hours after an episode of malignant hyperthermia.[22] Dantrolene should not be combined with verapamil, as it may lead to hyperkalemia and hypotension.[6] All facilities where malignant hyperthermia–triggering anesthetics are administered are recommended to stock an adequate amount of dantrolene, rescue equipment, and other medications needed to treat a malignant hyperthermia crisis.[32]
Strenuous Exercise, Heat Exposure, or Elevated Body Temperature
Genetically susceptible individuals are also at risk for a metabolic crisis without exposure to triggering agents. Exposure to strenuous exercise, extreme heat, or elevated internal body temperature (eg, infections) may precipitate a crisis. Research is currently underway to evaluate this possible link.
Other Issues
Life-threatening laryngospasm is a much more common event than malignant hyperthermia, which can be quickly treated with low-dose succinylcholine. Many office-based procedural facilities do not stock succinylcholine due to the risk of malignant hyperthermia and the need to stock the expensive dantrolene for triggering events. The Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia offered an opinion on the dilemma, stating that succinylcholine could be stocked at these locations for emergency use only, with the caveat that procedures should never be performed on known malignant hyperthermia–susceptible persons in those facilities.
North American Malignant Hyperthermia Registry
The North American Malignant Hyperthermia Registry of the Malignant Hyperthermia Association of the United States (MHAUS) is a database of information about patients and their families who have experienced malignant hyperthermia episodes. Healthcare professionals are encouraged to report malignant hyperthermia and malignant hyperthermia-like episodes to the registry. Patients and their families should be referred to MHAUS for information about this disorder and receive follow-up from specialists in this area.
Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes
Optimal outcomes in malignant hyperthermia require rapid, coordinated interprofessional care grounded in clear roles, closed-loop communication, and adherence to evidence-based protocols. Physicians and advanced practitioners lead diagnosis and management, anesthesiologists direct intraoperative care, and intensivists oversee ongoing monitoring and treatment of complications. Nurses provide continuous assessment, implement cooling and monitoring measures, and facilitate communication, while pharmacists ensure timely access to dantrolene, guide dosing, and support medication safety. Ethical, patient-centered care, structured handoffs, and postevent debriefing strengthen care coordination, patient safety, and team performance.[33]
References
Pinyavat T, Riazi S, Deng J, Slessarev M, Cuthbertson BH, Ibarra Moreno CA, Jerath A. Malignant Hyperthermia. Critical care medicine. 2024 Dec 1:52(12):1934-1940. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006401. Epub 2024 Aug 22 [PubMed PMID: 39171998]
Gregory H, Weant KA. Pathophysiology and Treatment of Malignant Hyperthermia. Advanced emergency nursing journal. 2021 Apr-Jun 01:43(2):102-110. doi: 10.1097/TME.0000000000000344. Epub [PubMed PMID: 33915557]
Litman RS, Rosenberg H. Malignant hyperthermia: update on susceptibility testing. JAMA. 2005 Jun 15:293(23):2918-24 [PubMed PMID: 15956637]
Baur CP, Klingler W, Jurkat-Rott K, Froeba G, Schoch E, Marx T, Georgieff M, Lehmann-Horn F. Xenon does not induce contracture in human malignant hyperthermia muscle. British journal of anaesthesia. 2000 Nov:85(5):712-6 [PubMed PMID: 11094586]
Larach MG, Brandom BW, Allen GC, Gronert GA, Lehman EB. Malignant hyperthermia deaths related to inadequate temperature monitoring, 2007-2012: a report from the North American malignant hyperthermia registry of the malignant hyperthermia association of the United States. Anesthesia and analgesia. 2014 Dec:119(6):1359-66. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000421. Epub [PubMed PMID: 25268394]
Rosenberg H, Pollock N, Schiemann A, Bulger T, Stowell K. Malignant hyperthermia: a review. Orphanet journal of rare diseases. 2015 Aug 4:10():93. doi: 10.1186/s13023-015-0310-1. Epub 2015 Aug 4 [PubMed PMID: 26238698]
Tobin JR, Jason DR, Challa VR, Nelson TE, Sambuughin N. Malignant hyperthermia and apparent heat stroke. JAMA. 2001 Jul 11:286(2):168-9 [PubMed PMID: 11448278]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceBritt BA. Malignant hyperthermia. Canadian Anaesthetists' Society journal. 1985 Nov:32(6):666-78 [PubMed PMID: 4075218]
Nelson TE, Flewellen EH. Current concepts. The malignant hyperthermia syndrome. The New England journal of medicine. 1983 Aug 18:309(7):416-8 [PubMed PMID: 6348539]
Dowling JJ, Riazi S, Litman RS. Episodic RYR1-Related Crisis: Part of the Evolving Spectrum of RYR1-Related Myopathies and Malignant Hyperthermia-Like Illnesses. A&A practice. 2021 Jan 19:15(1):e01377. doi: 10.1213/XAA.0000000000001377. Epub 2021 Jan 19 [PubMed PMID: 33512901]
Altamirano F, Riazi S, Ibarra Moreno CA, Kraeva N, Uryash A, Allen PD, Adams JA, Lopez JR. Is malignant hyperthermia associated with hyperglycaemia? British journal of anaesthesia. 2019 Jan:122(1):e3-e5. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.09.014. Epub 2018 Oct 23 [PubMed PMID: 30579418]
Dirksen RT, Allen PD, Lopez JR. Understanding malignant hyperthermia: each move forward opens our eyes to the distance left to travel. British journal of anaesthesia. 2019 Jan:122(1):8-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.10.026. Epub 2018 Nov 27 [PubMed PMID: 30579410]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceYamazawa T, Kobayashi T, Kurebayashi N, Konishi M, Noguchi S, Inoue T, Inoue YU, Nishino I, Mori S, Iinuma H, Manaka N, Kagechika H, Uryash A, Adams J, Lopez JR, Liu X, Diggle C, Allen PD, Kakizawa S, Ikeda K, Lin B, Ikemi Y, Nunomura K, Nakagawa S, Sakurai T, Murayama T. A novel RyR1-selective inhibitor prevents and rescues sudden death in mouse models of malignant hyperthermia and heat stroke. Nature communications. 2021 Jul 13:12(1):4293. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24644-1. Epub 2021 Jul 13 [PubMed PMID: 34257294]
Cong Z, Wan T, Wang J, Feng L, Cao C, Li Z, Wang X, Han Y, Zhou Y, Gao Y, Zhang J, Qu Y, Guo X. Epidemiological and clinical features of malignant hyperthermia: A scoping review. Clinical genetics. 2024 Mar:105(3):233-242. doi: 10.1111/cge.14475. Epub 2023 Dec 26 [PubMed PMID: 38148504]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceOtsuki S, Miyoshi H, Mukaida K, Yasuda T, Nakamura R, Tsutsumi YM. Age-Specific Clinical Features of Pediatric Malignant Hyperthermia: A Review of 187 Cases Over 60 Years in Japan. Anesthesia and analgesia. 2022 Jul 1:135(1):128-135. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005837. Epub 2021 Dec 28 [PubMed PMID: 34962895]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceLarach MG, Localio AR, Allen GC, Denborough MA, Ellis FR, Gronert GA, Kaplan RF, Muldoon SM, Nelson TE, Ording H. A clinical grading scale to predict malignant hyperthermia susceptibility. Anesthesiology. 1994 Apr:80(4):771-9 [PubMed PMID: 8024130]
Urwyler A, Deufel T, McCarthy T, West S, European Malignant Hyperthermia Group. Guidelines for molecular genetic detection of susceptibility to malignant hyperthermia. British journal of anaesthesia. 2001 Feb:86(2):283-7 [PubMed PMID: 11573677]
Hopkins PM, Ellis FR, Halsall PJ. Comparison of in vitro contracture testing with ryanodine, halothane and caffeine in malignant hyperthermia and other neuromuscular disorders. British journal of anaesthesia. 1993 Apr:70(4):397-401 [PubMed PMID: 8499197]
Ranklev E, Fletcher R, Blomquist S. Static v. dynamic tests in the in vitro diagnosis of malignant hyperthermia susceptibility. British journal of anaesthesia. 1986 Jun:58(6):646-8 [PubMed PMID: 3707802]
Hopkins PM, Gupta PK, Bilmen JG. Malignant hyperthermia. Handbook of clinical neurology. 2018:157():645-661. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64074-1.00038-0. Epub [PubMed PMID: 30459030]
Burkman JM, Posner KL, Domino KB. Analysis of the clinical variables associated with recrudescence after malignant hyperthermia reactions. Anesthesiology. 2007 May:106(5):901-6; quiz 1077-8 [PubMed PMID: 17457120]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceKolb ME, Horne ML, Martz R. Dantrolene in human malignant hyperthermia. Anesthesiology. 1982 Apr:56(4):254-62 [PubMed PMID: 7039419]
Hopkins PM, Girard T, Dalay S, Jenkins B, Thacker A, Patteril M, McGrady E. Malignant hyperthermia 2020: Guideline from the Association of Anaesthetists. Anaesthesia. 2021 May:76(5):655-664. doi: 10.1111/anae.15317. Epub 2021 Jan 5 [PubMed PMID: 33399225]
Litman RS. Confusing Terminology-Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome vs Malignant Hyperthermia. JAMA neurology. 2017 Aug 1:74(8):1012-1013. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.0822. Epub [PubMed PMID: 28558090]
Hopkins PM. Is there a link between malignant hyperthermia and exertional heat illness? British journal of sports medicine. 2007 May:41(5):283-4; discussion 284 [PubMed PMID: 17261558]
Lehmann-Horn F, Iaizzo PA. Are myotonias and periodic paralyses associated with susceptibility to malignant hyperthermia? British journal of anaesthesia. 1990 Nov:65(5):692-7 [PubMed PMID: 2248848]
Ratto D, Joyner RW. Dantrolene. StatPearls. 2026 Jan:(): [PubMed PMID: 30571019]
Hopkins PM. Succinylcholine and Dantrolene: Inseparable in the Emergency Cupboard? Anesthesiology. 2019 Jan:130(1):6-8. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002507. Epub [PubMed PMID: 30550424]
Lee SY, Szigeti GP, Szasz AM. Oncological hyperthermia: The correct dosing in clinical applications. International journal of oncology. 2019 Feb:54(2):627-643. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2018.4645. Epub 2018 Nov 23 [PubMed PMID: 30483754]
Rosenberg H, Davis M, James D, Pollock N, Stowell K. Malignant hyperthermia. Orphanet journal of rare diseases. 2007 Apr 24:2():21 [PubMed PMID: 17456235]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceGong X. Malignant hyperthermia when dantrolene is not readily available. BMC anesthesiology. 2021 Apr 16:21(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01328-3. Epub 2021 Apr 16 [PubMed PMID: 33863282]
Larach MG, Klumpner TT, Brandom BW, Vaughn MT, Belani KG, Herlich A, Kim TW, Limoncelli J, Riazi S, Sivak EL, Capacchione J, Mashman D, Kheterpal S, Kooij F, Wilczak J, Soto R, Berris J, Price Z, Lins S, Coles P, Harris JM, Cummings KC 3rd, Berman MF, Nanamori M, Adelman BT, Wedeven C, LaGorio J, McCormick PJ, Tom S, Aziz MF, Coffman T, Ellis TA 2nd, Molina S, Peterson W, Mackey SC, van Klei WA, Ginde AA, Biggs DA, Neuman MD, Craft RM, Pace NL, Paganelli WC, Durieux ME, Nair BJ, Wanderer JP, Miller SA, Helsten DL, Turnbull ZA, Schonberger RB, Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group. Succinylcholine Use and Dantrolene Availability for Malignant Hyperthermia Treatment: Database Analyses and Systematic Review. Anesthesiology. 2019 Jan:130(1):41-54. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002490. Epub [PubMed PMID: 30550426]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceCain CL, Riess ML, Gettrust L, Novalija J. Malignant hyperthermia crisis: optimizing patient outcomes through simulation and interdisciplinary collaboration. AORN journal. 2014 Feb:99(2):301-8; quiz 309-11. doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2013.06.012. Epub [PubMed PMID: 24472592]