Introduction
The latissimus dorsi flap, whether myocutaneous or myofascial, is a highly versatile reconstructive option used in head, neck, torso, and breast reconstruction surgeries, providing a versatile solution to a wide range of reconstructive challenges (see Image. Latissimus Dorsi Myocutaneous Free Flap and Image. Latissimus Dorsi Myofascial Free Flap).[1][2][3] Surgeons harvest the flap from the latissimus dorsi muscle, which is richly vascularized by the thoracodorsal vessels. This ensures flap viability and enables its use as both a pedicled and a free tissue transfer.
This flap provides an abundant source of pliable soft tissue, a quality often lacking in alternative flap options. Moreover, the myocutaneous version of the latissimus dorsi flap includes skin and subcutaneous tissue, providing extra bulk as needed and enhancing its versatility across various clinical scenarios.[4] Flap harvest can include the thoracodorsal nerve, which, when coapted with a motor nerve at the reconstructive site, can preserve muscular contraction. This is beneficial for facial reanimation, for example. With minimal absolute contraindications and remarkable versatility, this flap is an indispensable tool in the arsenal of reconstructive surgeons, offering effective solutions for complex defects.
In postmastectomy breast reconstruction, the pedicled latissimus dorsi transfer is commonly used, and its application also extends to free functional muscle transfer for facial reanimation.[5][6][7] Whether used as a muscle flap alone or with skin, the pedicled latissimus dorsi flap can effectively address chest or neck defects without tension. This approach is particularly advantageous for women with neck defects, as it avoids potential breast deformities associated with pectoralis flap reconstruction. In extensive cases, surgeons may harvest a mega flap that includes the latissimus dorsi and parascapular soft tissues, along with the subscapular artery, circumflex scapular arteries, and thoracodorsal branches. These mega flaps may require inclusion of the scapular bone, rib, and serratus anterior muscle in the reconstruction.[8]
Recent advancements in surgical techniques have extended the use of the latissimus dorsi flap beyond traditional reconstructive applications, exemplified by its use in neophallus construction for transgender individuals.[3] This innovative adaptation underscores the flap's remarkable versatility and ability to address diverse anatomical and functional requirements. Consequently, the latissimus dorsi flap continues to evolve, broadening its range of applications and confirming its crucial role in modern surgical practice.
Anatomy and Physiology
Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Search engine and full access to all medical articles
10 free questions in your specialty
Free CME/CE Activities
Free daily question in your email
Save favorite articles to your dashboard
Emails offering discounts
Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care
Anatomy and Physiology
The latissimus dorsi is one of the body's strongest muscles, with a surface area of up to 20 × 40 cm. This muscle originates from the spine and ilium and extends across the upper and mid-back to attach to the superior humerus. Positioned superficially to the ribs and intercostal muscles, it extends superiorly and laterally to the inferior scapula and humerus (see Image. Posterior Axioappendicular Muscles). Alongside the teres major and pectoralis major muscles, the latissimus dorsi contributes to arm adduction, medial rotation, and extension at the shoulder.[1]
The latissimus dorsi is perfused by the thoracodorsal vessels and is innervated by the thoracodorsal nerve (see Image. The Thoracodorsal Nerve). The thoracodorsal artery, a terminal branch of the subscapular artery, descends along the lateral aspect of the back, typically accompanied by 1 or 2 venae comitantes. This artery gives off descending and transverse branches, with its terminal branches supplying the serratus anterior muscle. Blood vessels enter the latissimus dorsi muscle belly approximately 10 cm from its humeral insertion and continue along its deep surface.
Indications
Transferring the latissimus dorsi flap to reconstruct large, complex defects in the head, neck, and chest regions is recommended. This flap is suitable for cases where extensive soft-tissue coverage is needed, especially in defects involving the entire scalp.[4] Alternatively, muscle transfer without overlying skin and soft tissues is suitable for facial reanimation. Finally, harvesting the muscle and its overlying skin, rolling the flap into a cylinder, and transferring the cylinder are indicated in neophallus creation.
Contraindications
An absolute contraindication for the latissimus dorsi flap arises when prior injuries or surgeries to the shoulder or back have disrupted the proposed flap's blood supply, rendering it compromised for transfer. Relative contraindications include smoking, diabetes, and poor vascular health. Smoking significantly impacts microcirculation, necessitating discussions about smoking cessation with patients.
The risk of flap failure is higher in patients with diabetes, particularly those with poor glycemic control and compromised vascular health. Moreover, when radiotherapy is planned after surgical resection and reconstruction for comprehensive cancer management, using a muscle-only flap with overlying split-thickness skin grafts becomes a relative contraindication. Notably, incorporating skin grafts requires a minimum 6-week healing interval before radiation exposure, which may delay the initiation of radiotherapy.[9]
Equipment
The following equipment is necessary for a latissimus dorsi transfer:
- Surgical marker
- Bard-Parker scalpel handle (#15 blade on a #3)
- Doppler ultrasound probe
- Forceps, including DeBakey, Gerald, and Adson-Brown
- Hemostats
- Dissecting scissors, including Metzenbaum and Reynolds tenotomy
- Suture scissors, including Iris and Mayo
- Needle holders
- Bipolar and monopolar electrocautery
- Retractors, including Army-Navy, Richardson, and Senn
- Suction tips, including Goodhill and Frazier
- Gauze sponges
- Sutures for closure, including 3-0 or 4-0 nylon for the skin surface, 2-0 or 3-0 poliglecaprone for deep dermal closure, and 2-0 polyglactin for fascia
- Dermatome for split-thickness skin graft harvest (optional)
The following equipment is necessary for a free tissue transfer:
- Microvascular instruments, including needle holders, forceps, needle drivers, suture and adventitial scissors, vessel dilators, and vessel clamps
- Venous couplers
- Heparinized saline
- Weck cell spears
- Vessel loops
- Papaverine or 2% plain lidocaine
- Operating microscope
- Nylon sutures (8-0 or 9-0) on a tapered needle
Personnel
A latissimus dorsi flap transfer typically requires a minimum of 4 individuals in the operating room, including a surgeon, a surgical technician, a circulating nurse, and anesthesia personnel, as well as additional surgical assistants, who may be needed for tissue retraction.
Preparation
Before undergoing a latissimus dorsi flap transfer, patients should undergo a thorough preoperative risk assessment to minimize potential complications. This assessment includes screening for cardiovascular and pulmonary conditions that may increase risks associated with general endotracheal anesthesia. While preoperative imaging of the harvest and inset sites is not mandatory for latissimus transfer, meticulous planning and preparation are crucial.
Given the potential for significant blood loss during surgery, a type and screen should be conducted to prepare for the possibility of transfusion. Furthermore, assessing and optimizing patients' nutrition, electrolyte levels, thyroid hormone levels, and other wound-healing predictors is essential before reconstructive surgery.[8] These measures collectively enhance patient safety and optimize surgical outcomes.
A thorough physical exam of the proposed harvest and transfer sites is necessary before entering the operating room. In the case of a pedicled flap transfer, the size of the flap and its pedicle can be estimated by examining the patient's back; the transfer vector should be approximated to ensure sufficient length to reach the desired reconstructive area. The back, shoulder, and flank should also be examined for scars that may indicate previous trauma potentially compromising flap harvest and transfer.
Discussions with anesthesia personnel are crucial to ensure optimal perioperative management before latissimus dorsi flap transfer. Maintaining a mean arterial pressure greater than 60 mm Hg is recommended to ensure adequate flap perfusion, with consideration of the availability of crystalloid, colloid, and blood products.[10] When managing low blood pressure in patients, some advocate for colloid while others favor crystalloid or blood products.
Concerns have been raised about the potential microcirculatory risks of using vasopressors, such as norepinephrine, on the flap. However, existing literature supporting this perspective is limited, and outcomes in patients receiving vasopressors appear comparable to those who do not, given appropriate fluid management and avoidance of hypovolemia.[11][12][13] In instances where a vasopressor is required, dobutamine may improve flap perfusion.[14]
Furthermore, maintaining the patient's and flap's temperatures between 35 °C and 37 °C optimizes flap perfusion by preventing vasoconstriction, a task that requires coordination with the operating room and anesthesia personnel.[15] Finally, administering preoperative antibiotics and continuing them for several days postoperatively are essential for preventing infection and ensuring optimal outcomes.
Technique or Treatment
Effective planning and execution of the latissimus dorsi flap procedure require careful consideration of various techniques to ensure optimal outcomes in reconstructive surgery.
Positioning
While the conventional method involves harvesting the latissimus dorsi flap in the prone position and then transitioning to a supine position for flap inset, alternative positions can also be effective. Some surgeons opt for a lateral decubitus or supine position, with a padded bump or a surgical assistant, to maintain a slightly rotated orientation. These adaptations allow for successful flap harvesting while providing flexibility in positioning based on patient and surgeon preferences, potentially enhancing procedural efficiency and patient comfort. These variations offer flexibility and may suit specific patient needs or surgeon preferences. Adjusting the flap harvest and inset positions can enhance accessibility and comfort while maintaining surgical precision and efficiency.
Measurement
Precise measurements ensure adequate tissue coverage and optimal outcomes when planning a pedicled flap. One effective method is to use a gauze strip to mark the distal edge of the flap, extending from the wound's farthest edge to the pivot point, typically located between the scapula and axilla. Surgeons can accurately mark the flap's edge by anchoring 1 end of the gauze at the pivot point and rotating the other end to the back.
Similarly, determining the skin paddle harvest site is crucial for free tissue transfer, as it depends on the required pedicle length and location. Including the point of entry of the thoracodorsal artery into the latissimus muscle, typically located around 10 cm beyond its attachment to the humeral head, is essential to ensure tissue viability and the success of the flap transfer. This meticulous planning is crucial for ensuring flap viability and success.
Incisions
The surgical procedure begins with an incision along the midaxillary line, extending from the armpit downwards to the anterior-superior iliac spine. Deep dissection is then performed to locate the lateral edge of the latissimus muscle while carefully separating the serratus anterior and rhomboid muscles encountered during this process. The avascular plane beneath the latissimus dorsi is accessed, allowing visualization of the thoracodorsal vessels along the muscle's deep surface.
Once the vessel location is confirmed, a medial incision is made to outline the skin paddle intended for harvesting, ensuring it directly overlies the blood vessels. Alternatively, if a skin paddle is not required, monopolar electrocautery is used to elevate the skin and subcutaneous tissue from the superficial muscle surface. This is followed by a medial incision through the muscle to include the thoracodorsal vessels.
In an alternative approach, the location of the flap skin paddle is determined based on the approximate entry point of the thoracodorsal vessels into the muscle. After marking, an incision is made in the skin, and dissection is carried down to the surface of the latissimus muscle. Electrocautery is used to expose the superficial surface of the muscle laterally and superiorly.
Continuing the incision along the medial and inferior aspects of the skin paddle allows access to the deep surface of the latissimus muscle. The muscle is then bluntly elevated superolateral to the level at which the thoracodorsal vessels are visualized. The muscle surrounding the pedicle can be carefully narrowed to prevent vascular injury if necessary. During facial reanimation procedures, surgeons perform microsurgical coaptation of the thoracodorsal nerve, which runs parallel and lateral to the blood vessels, to the masseteric nerve. Alternatively, a cross-face nerve graft may be utilized.
Free Tissue Transfer
In free tissue transfer, the thoracodorsal vessels are dissected proximally to extend the pedicle length, necessitating ligation of the branches to the serratus anterior muscle and scapula. Once an adequate length is achieved, the pedicle can be ligated, and the flap is repositioned for microvascular anastomosis at its new site. In addition, it is crucial to minimize ischemia time (the duration between pedicle division and completion of microvascular anastomosis) to avoid irreversible muscle damage, which typically occurs after 3 hours.[16] If the anticipated ischemia time exceeds this limit, cooling and perfusion with heparinized saline may help protect the flap.[17]
Pedicled Flap Transfer
During pedicled flap transfer to the head and neck, it is crucial to detach the latissimus dorsi from the humeral head and ligate vessel branches to the scapula. This step facilitates flap rotation and prevents vessel kinking, which could compromise flap viability post-transfer. A subcutaneous plane superficial to the pectoralis muscle is developed for anterior torso transfer. In contrast, a similar tunnel is created superficial to the pectoralis muscle and the clavicle, and deep to the platysma, for head and neck transfer. Additionally, an incision parallel to and superior to the clavicle may facilitate flap transfer in this region. Furthermore, creating wide tissue tunnels is essential to accommodate the flap and prevent vascular compression in all pedicled flap transfer cases.
Closure
After flap transfer, the latissimus is inset using layers of absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures. Achieving meticulous hemostasis at both the inset and donor sites is crucial to prevent hematoma development. In the case of a muscle-only flap transfer, it should be covered with split-thickness skin grafts and a bolster. Ideally, the donor site should be closed primarily; however, significant subcutaneous undermining may be necessary for advancement and closure, especially with large skin paddle transfers. If primary closure of the donor site is not feasible, the remaining open wound can be covered with split-thickness skin grafts and a bolster. After pedicled latissimus transfer, the patient is often placed in an arm sling to restrict shoulder and arm movement on the flap side during the initial healing phase.
Postprocedural Follow-up
Following free tissue transfer procedures, frequent flap examinations during the initial 48 to 72 hours are crucial for promptly identifying any developing complications. Surgeons typically conduct hourly checks during the first 24 hours, then every 2 hours on postoperative days 2 and 3. As reepithelialization progresses and the risk of venous thrombosis diminishes, examinations may become less frequent until discharge.[8]
During postprocedural checkups, clinicians assess the flap's color, warmth, turgor, capillary refill, and Doppler signals. Needle pricking is used to assess color and bleeding rate, aiding in detecting venous congestion or arterial insufficiency. Ensuring meticulous intraoperative hemostasis and restricting postoperative activities for 2 weeks help reduce the risk of hematoma formation. In addition, maintaining controlled blood pressure is crucial to prevent vascular compression caused by hematomas or wound infections.
Complications
The most concerning complication in flap surgery is flap failure, which can manifest as partial or complete loss due to vascular compromise during the initial few weeks of healing.[8] Prompt recognition and intervention are crucial for salvaging compromised flaps. Timely recognition of vascular compromise is essential, as early intervention can salvage flaps by addressing vascular occlusion and kinking or using leech therapy to mitigate venous congestion.
Leeches aid in flap salvage by directly removing venous blood and secreting hirudin, which is a natural anticoagulant that inhibits thrombin from converting fibrinogen to fibrin and activating platelets.[18] However, when using leeches, prophylactic administration of a fluoroquinolone antibiotic is crucial to prevent Aeromonas hydrophila infection, which is commonly found in the gut of medicinal leeches.[19] Despite interventions, prolonged venous congestion or inadequate arterial inflow may lead to irreversible flap loss.
Early recognition of vascular insufficiency in a free latissimus dorsi flap is paramount, as irreversible microcirculatory damage can occur after 6 hours of ischemia.[20] A swift return to the operating room is crucial to restoring perfusion, with up to a 90% salvage rate achievable if corrective measures are implemented promptly.[21] Most vascular occlusions occur within the initial 48 hours, with later thromboses posing a lower likelihood of salvage, particularly for muscle flaps.[21] To optimize circulation while preparing for urgent reoperation, interventions may include releasing sutures overlying the pedicle and administering aspirin and heparin. Another option is to inject a high-dose thrombolytic agent, such as streptokinase or urokinase, into the flap and drain it through the flap vein rather than into the systemic circulation if direct mechanical thrombectomy fails.[22]
Clinical Significance
The latissimus dorsi flap, whether used as a free or pedicled transfer, with or without the overlying skin and subcutaneous tissue, and with or without thoracodorsal nerve transfer, provides a straightforward yet versatile solution for reconstructive challenges involving the head, neck, and torso. The generous tissue coverage and favorable skin characteristics of the latissimus dorsi flap, including color and texture, often yield aesthetically pleasing results. Furthermore, its ability to manage extensive wounds where alternative options may be inadequate underscores its indispensable role in the reconstructive surgeon's repertoire.
Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes
Successful latissimus dorsi flap reconstruction depends on coordinated preoperative planning, technical expertise, and effective communication among an interprofessional healthcare team to optimize flap viability, functional recovery, and patient satisfaction. Physicians and advanced practice providers collaborate to evaluate patient comorbidities, nutritional status, smoking history, prior radiation therapy, vascular anatomy, and reconstructive goals to determine whether the latissimus dorsi flap is the most appropriate reconstructive option. Plastic and reconstructive surgeons frequently work alongside surgical oncologists, breast surgeons, thoracic surgeons, orthopedic surgeons, otolaryngologists, vascular surgeons, and anesthesiologists to coordinate oncologic resection, defect reconstruction, and perioperative management while minimizing operative time and complications. Careful preoperative counseling and shared decision-making help establish realistic expectations regarding donor-site morbidity, functional recovery, aesthetic outcomes, rehabilitation, and potential complications, allowing patients to participate in treatment planning actively.
Interprofessional communication remains essential throughout the perioperative and postoperative periods. Nurses provide patient education, monitor flap perfusion and donor-site wounds, manage drains and dressings, assess pain, and promptly communicate early signs of vascular compromise, hematoma, seroma, infection, or wound dehiscence to the surgical team. Pharmacists optimize perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis, multimodal analgesia, venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, and medication reconciliation while identifying potential drug interactions that may increase bleeding or impair wound healing.
Physical and occupational therapists play a critical role in postoperative rehabilitation by guiding progressive shoulder range-of-motion exercises, strengthening programs, and activity modifications that preserve flap integrity while minimizing long-term functional deficits of the shoulder and upper extremity. Nutrition specialists support wound healing by optimizing protein and caloric intake, particularly in patients with cancer or chronic illness. Standardized postoperative monitoring protocols, coordinated discharge planning, and close communication among all members of the healthcare team facilitate early recognition and management of complications, improve patient safety, enhance functional and aesthetic outcomes, reduce hospital readmissions, and promote high-quality, patient-centered reconstructive care.
Media
(Click Image to Enlarge)
Posterior Axioappendicular Muscles. This image depicts the posterior axioappendicular muscles, including the trapezius, levator scapulae, latissimus dorsi, rhomboid major and minor, and serratus posterior inferior. Additional muscles shown in the image include the sternocleidomastoid, splenius capitis of services, deltoideus, teres major, and infraspinatus. Bony structures featured in the image include the vertebral column, occipital bone and superior nuchal line, scapular spine, iliac crest, and sacral vertebra. Furthermore, the ligamentum nuchae and lumbar triangle are also depicted in this image.
Henry Vandyke Carter, Public Domain, via Wikimedia Commons
(Click Image to Enlarge)
(Click Image to Enlarge)
(Click Image to Enlarge)
Latissimus Dorsi Myofascial Free Flap. The image shows that the flap has been harvested and is ready for inset (A). The anticipated inset between the modiolus of the oral commissure and the superficial musculoaponeurotic system/temporalis fascia for facial reanimation is shown (B)..
Contributed by TA Hadlock, MD
References
Jeno SH, Varacallo MA. Anatomy, Back, Latissimus Dorsi. StatPearls. 2026 Jan:(): [PubMed PMID: 28846224]
Chu B, Bordoni B. Anatomy, Thorax, Thoracodorsal Nerves. StatPearls. 2026 Jan:(): [PubMed PMID: 30969583]
Dennis M, Granger A, Ortiz A, Terrell M, Loukos M, Schober J. The anatomy of the musculocutaneous latissimus dorsi flap for neophalloplasty. Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.). 2018 Mar:31(2):152-159. doi: 10.1002/ca.23016. Epub 2017 Dec 28 [PubMed PMID: 29178203]
Uzun H, Bitik O, Ersoy US, Bilginer B, Aksu AE. Comparison of Musculocutaneous and Fasciocutaneous Free Flaps for the Reconstruction of the Extensive Composite Scalp and Cranium Defects. The Journal of craniofacial surgery. 2018 Oct:29(7):1947-1951. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005052. Epub [PubMed PMID: 30204725]
Cattelani L, Spotti A, Pedrazzi G, Arcuri MF, Gussago F, Polotto S. Latissimus Dorsi Myocutaneous Flap in Immediate Reconstruction after Salvage Mastectomy Post-Lumpectomy and Radiation Therapy. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open. 2019 Jul:7(7):e2296. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002296. Epub 2019 Jul 5 [PubMed PMID: 31942334]
Watanabe Y, Yamamoto T, Hirai R, Sasaki R, Agawa K, Akizuki T. One-stage free transfer of latissimus dorsi-serratus anterior combined muscle flap with dual innervation for smile reanimation in established facial paralysis. Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS. 2020 Jun:73(6):1107-1115. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.01.032. Epub 2020 Jan 31 [PubMed PMID: 32334999]
Wong M, Ozaki M, Kurita M, Ihara A, Iwashina Y, Takushima A. Soft Tissue Reconstruction and Facial Reanimation With Bilateral Latissimus Dorsi Flaps After Extensive Resection of Head and Neck Arteriovenous Malformation: A Case Report. Annals of plastic surgery. 2019 Jul:83(1):73-77. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001878. Epub [PubMed PMID: 31135509]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceVincent A, Sawhney R, Ducic Y. Perioperative Care of Free Flap Patients. Seminars in plastic surgery. 2019 Feb:33(1):5-12. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676824. Epub 2019 Mar 8 [PubMed PMID: 30863206]
Braza ME, Marietta M, Fahrenkopf MP. Split-Thickness Skin Grafts. StatPearls. 2026 Jan:(): [PubMed PMID: 31855388]
Kass JL, Lakha S, Levin MA, Joseph T, Lin HM, Genden EM, Teng MS, Miles BA, DeMaria S Jr. Intraoperative hypotension and flap loss in free tissue transfer surgery of the head and neck. Head & neck. 2018 Nov:40(11):2334-2339. doi: 10.1002/hed.25190. Epub 2018 Sep 19 [PubMed PMID: 30230116]
Haughey BH, Wilson E, Kluwe L, Piccirillo J, Fredrickson J, Sessions D, Spector G. Free flap reconstruction of the head and neck: analysis of 241 cases. Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2001 Jul:125(1):10-7 [PubMed PMID: 11458207]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceCannady SB, Hatten K, Wax MK. Postoperative Controversies in the Management of Free Flap Surgery in the Head and Neck. Facial plastic surgery clinics of North America. 2016 Aug:24(3):309-14. doi: 10.1016/j.fsc.2016.03.007. Epub 2016 May 24 [PubMed PMID: 27400844]
Ettinger KS, Arce K, Lohse CM, Peck BW, Reiland MD, Bezak BJ, Moore EJ. Higher perioperative fluid administration is associated with increased rates of complications following head and neck microvascular reconstruction with fibular free flaps. Microsurgery. 2017 Feb:37(2):128-136. doi: 10.1002/micr.30061. Epub 2016 Apr 21 [PubMed PMID: 27098099]
Brinkman JN, Derks LH, Klimek M, Mureau MA. Perioperative fluid management and use of vasoactive and antithrombotic agents in free flap surgery: a literature review and clinical recommendations. Journal of reconstructive microsurgery. 2013 Jul:29(6):357-66. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1343955. Epub 2013 Apr 18 [PubMed PMID: 23599215]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceMotakef S, Mountziaris PM, Ismail IK, Agag RL, Patel A. Emerging paradigms in perioperative management for microsurgical free tissue transfer: review of the literature and evidence-based guidelines. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2015 Jan:135(1):290-299. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000839. Epub [PubMed PMID: 25539313]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceBlaisdell FW. The pathophysiology of skeletal muscle ischemia and the reperfusion syndrome: a review. Cardiovascular surgery (London, England). 2002 Dec:10(6):620-30 [PubMed PMID: 12453699]
Kolbenschlag J, Lescan M, Bahrs C, Bornemann A, Daigeler A, Schäfer R. Transplantation of a latissimus dorsi flap after nearly 6 hr of extracorporal perfusion: A case report. Microsurgery. 2021 Jan:41(1):75-78. doi: 10.1002/micr.30649. Epub 2020 Sep 12 [PubMed PMID: 32918759]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceJunren C, Xiaofang X, Huiqiong Z, Gangmin L, Yanpeng Y, Xiaoyu C, Yuqing G, Yanan L, Yue Z, Fu P, Cheng P. Pharmacological Activities and Mechanisms of Hirudin and Its Derivatives - A Review. Frontiers in pharmacology. 2021:12():660757. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.660757. Epub 2021 Apr 16 [PubMed PMID: 33935784]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceLineaweaver WC, Hill MK, Buncke GM, Follansbee S, Buncke HJ, Wong RK, Manders EK, Grotting JC, Anthony J, Mathes SJ. Aeromonas hydrophila infections following use of medicinal leeches in replantation and flap surgery. Annals of plastic surgery. 1992 Sep:29(3):238-44 [PubMed PMID: 1524373]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceWolff KD, Stiller D. Ischemia tolerance of free-muscle flaps: an NMR-spectroscopic study in the rat. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 1993 Mar:91(3):485-91 [PubMed PMID: 8438020]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceNovakovic D, Patel RS, Goldstein DP, Gullane PJ. Salvage of failed free flaps used in head and neck reconstruction. Head & neck oncology. 2009 Aug 21:1():33. doi: 10.1186/1758-3284-1-33. Epub 2009 Aug 21 [PubMed PMID: 19698095]
Wang W, Ong A, Vincent AG, Shokri T, Scott B, Ducic Y. Flap Failure and Salvage in Head and Neck Reconstruction. Seminars in plastic surgery. 2020 Nov:34(4):314-320. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1721766. Epub 2020 Dec 24 [PubMed PMID: 33380919]