Abnormal Labor in Obstetrics: Recognition and Management
Introduction
Normal labor is defined as regular and painful uterine contractions resulting in progressive cervical effacement and dilation. Abnormal labor refers to labor patterns that deviate from established normal standards. A clear understanding of normal labor progression is crucial for recognizing dysfunctional labor.[1]
Labor consists of 3 stages: the first stage begins with painful contractions, causing progressive cervical change, and concludes with full cervical dilation. The first stage is further divided into latent and active phases. The second stage of labor begins with complete cervical dilation and concludes with the delivery of the fetus. This stage is characterized by active maternal expulsive efforts to facilitate birthing. The third stage of labor begins with the delivery of the fetus and ends with placental delivery.[2] Abnormal labor occurs across all stages and is described as a prolonged, protracted, or arrested progression of labor.[3]
The stages and phases of labor have specific time intervals used in labor evaluation and interpretation. Ideally, patients are evaluated with or without pelvic examinations every 2–4 or more hours to assess labor progress. The American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists (ACOG) defines the stages and phases of labor as follows:
- First Stage: 0 to 10 cm cervical dilation
- Latent phase: 0 to 5 cm dilation
- Active phase: 6 cm dilation to complete cervical dilation
- Second Stage: begins at 10 cm dilation; uterine contractions, along with maternal expulsive efforts, lead to the descent of the presenting fetal part and delivery of the fetus
- Third Stage: time between delivery of the fetus and placental delivery
In 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) launched a new Labor Care Guide, comprising 7 sections. This care guide defines the start of the active phase of labor as 5 cm. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) supports this care guide and recommends implementation in all obstetrical settings.[4] Notably, a discrepancy among international guidelines regarding the onset of active labor. As stated above, ACOG defines active labor as beginning at 6 cm of cervical dilation. The following parameters apply to full-term singleton pregnancies and represent the time 95% of patients will complete a given stage or phase of labor. These parameters should be considered when classifying labor as abnormal:
First Stage Prolongation, Protraction, and Arrest
- Latent Phase Prolongation
- Nulliparous: The latent phase duration is longer than 20 hours
- Multiparous: The latent phase duration is longer than 14 hours
- Due to its variable and slow progression, latent phase prolongation alone does not indicate cesarean delivery.
- Active Phase Protraction and Arrest (once 6 cm cervical dilation is achieved)
- No cervical dilation after 4 hours of adequate contractions, with ruptured membranes.
- No cervical dilation after 6 hours of inadequate contractions, with ruptured membranes, and despite oxytocin administration.[5]
Second Stage Protraction and Arrest
- Nulliparous: The second stage duration is longer than 3 hours without an epidural or 4 hours with an epidural.
- Multiparous: The second stage duration is longer than 2 hours without an epidural or 3 hours with an epidural.
- Longer durations may be appropriate when maternal and fetal statuses are reassuring and the fetal presenting part continues to descend.
- ACOG recommends that second-stage labor arrest be diagnosed earlier with a lack of fetal descent and rotation despite adequate expulsive efforts, contractions, and time.[5]
Third Stage Abnormality
- Placental retention duration is longer than 30 minutes following fetal delivery.
- The risk of adverse maternal outcomes increases after a third stage of 15 minutes.[1][6]
Etiology
Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Search engine and full access to all medical articles
10 free questions in your specialty
Free CME/CE Activities
Free daily question in your email
Save favorite articles to your dashboard
Emails offering discounts
Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care
Etiology
Normal labor progression requires consideration of the 3 "Ps," representing power, passage, and passenger. Power refers to uterine contractions and maternal expulsive efforts. The passage is the maternal pelvis, and the fetus is the passenger. Abnormal labor progression may be related to 1 or more of these factors. The size, position, and presentation of the fetus and the adequacy of the maternal pelvis are tested as uterine contractions provide propulsion. Asynclitism or extension of the fetal head, occiput posterior or transverse positions, and mentum or brow presentations may contribute to or be the sole etiologies of abnormal labor progression or dystocia.[7] Labor abnormalities due to unfavorable fetal or maternal pelvic dynamics may require a cesarean delivery.[8]
Uncommonly, a Bandl ring may be associated with protracted or arrested labor. A Bandl ring constricts between the thicker upper contractile and thinner lower uterine segments. Why this constriction develops during parturition is unclear—although prolonged labor and labor dystocia have been suggested as possible causes.[9]
Risk Factors Associated with Abnormal Labor
Maternal Factors
- Advanced maternal age
- Bandl ring
- Chorioamnionitis
- Epidural analgesia
- Gestational diabetes
- Hypertensive disorders
- Inadequate uterine contractions
- Lack of supportive care during labor
- Large weight gain in pregnancy
- Non-gynecoid maternal pelvimetry
- Nulliparity
- Poor hydration and nutrition during labor
- Postterm pregnancy
- Short stature
- Obesity
- Labor induction
Fetal Factors
- High fetal station at full cervical dilation
- Macrosomia
- Malpresentation
- Fetal anomalies
- Nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracing [10]
Epidemiology
Abnormalities of labor are common worldwide. Pelvic shape varies significantly among women, and the fit between the maternal pelvis and fetus is exceptionally tight, unlike in other primates.[11] Approximately 20% of all labor involves protraction and/or arrest disorders. Disorders of labor are the most common reason for primary cesarean sections.[12] Abnormal labor involving true labor dystocia can result in fetal and/or maternal injury and even death. The trend toward more cesarean sections in developed countries has drawn attention to initiatives to minimize primary cesarean sections safely. In this regard, guidelines have been developed to implement more conservative management strategies for labor's first and second stages.[13]
There is currently no evidence-based consensus on what constitutes arrest during the latent phase of labor. Therefore, according to ACOG, in cases where both maternal and fetal conditions remain reassuring, cesarean delivery solely due to a prolonged latent phase should be avoided. For patients undergoing labor induction, the term “failed induction” is more appropriate when there is no cervical change during the latent phase, rather than labeling it as latent phase arrest. A prolonged first stage of labor may result in adverse outcomes for both mother and neonate.[5]
After the delivery of the fetus, the third stage of labor culminates in the delivery of the placenta. Abnormalities in the third stage can lead to postpartum hemorrhage requiring blood transfusions and, at times, resulting in maternal morbidity and mortality. Postpartum hemorrhage affects approximately 5% of all deliveries. The mean duration of the third stage of labor is 5 to 6 minutes when using active management, and 90% of the third stages take less than 10 minutes. Postpartum hemorrhage is more likely when the third stage lasts more than 18 minutes and significantly more likely when the third stage lasts over 30 minutes.[14]
Pathophysiology
The pathophysiology of abnormal labor is poorly understood. Friedman initially established a labor curve for the expected timeframe of the first stage of labor; however, it has since been contemporized by Zhang et al.[15] Recent reference graphs indicate that the latent phase of labor is much longer than initially thought, and the active stage of labor begins at 6 cm of cervical dilation. Induced labor tends to have a longer latent phase in the first stage of labor when compared to spontaneous labor. However, the active phase of the first and second stages does not vary significantly, regardless of whether labor is spontaneous or induced. Insufficient uterine activity is the most common reason for a labor abnormality in the first stage of labor.[16]
Labor is a physically intensive process, and prenatal exercise may play a role in increased uterine contractility. Increased physical activity levels have been associated with higher levels of oxytocin and decreased need for induction and augmentation of labor.[17] Maternal inactivity during pregnancy may be associated with prolonged labor. Results from a prospective cohort study showed that patients who were physically active during pregnancy were less likely to have a prolonged latent phase of labor and more likely to have a shorter active phase of labor.[17] For these and other reasons, regular prenatal exercise is highly encouraged.
Toxicokinetics
Oxytocin is a key pharmacologic agent in the augmentation of inadequate uterine contractions and, thus, in treating abnormal labor; it is 1 of the most commonly used medications in obstetrics. Exogenous oxytocin responsiveness typically commences at 20 weeks of pregnancy and increases with advancing gestational age until 34 weeks, when it appears to plateau.[18] Oxytocin has a short plasma half-life of 3 to 6 minutes and is utilized during labor as a continuous intravenous infusion.
Due to the high risk of patient harm when used in error, oxytocin is a high-alert medication.[19] Adverse maternal effects associated with oxytocin use in labor include flushing, nausea, vomiting, headache, tachycardia, and hypotension.[20] Maternal water retention and hyponatremia rarely occur due to oxytocin use and only with extended exposures to high doses of oxytocin, mainly if administered in hypotonic solutions. Hyponatremia is due to oxytocin's structure being similar to vasopressin's, causing cross-reactions with renal vasopressin receptors.[21] Uterine tachysystole commonly occurs as a result of oxytocin administration during labor. Tachysystole is 6 or more contractions in a 10-minute window, averaged over 30 minutes. Without adequate time for uterine relaxation between contractions, there is a potential for decreased fetal oxygenation.[20]
History and Physical
Labor begins with regular, painful uterine contractions, resulting in cervical effacement and dilation. An essential piece of the patient history to obtain is the start time of contractions and their occurrence interval. An abdominal examination is a critical component of an obstetric examination, providing an estimated fetal weight and an assessment of fetal presentation. Continuous monitoring of uterine activity discerns how frequently contractions occur. Internal pressure catheter monitoring measures the actual strength of uterine contractions.
Fetal heart rate tracing may provide reassurance of fetal well-being throughout the labor process; however, the interpretation is highly varied and not diagnostic of fetal acidemia. Digital vaginal exams, conducted at different intervals throughout labor, assess maternal pelvimetry, bony pelvis shape and capacity, as well as cervical effacement and dilation. Serial digital exams are used to determine the fetal position, station, and descent of the presenting part, which is crucial in assessing the normal or abnormal progression of labor.[22]
Evaluation
Determining the progression of labor is a critical component of intrapartum care. Maternal uterine activity is assessed by manual palpation, external tocodynamometry, or monitoring with an intrauterine pressure catheter. Using external tocodynamometry, target uterine activity is 3 to 5 contractions in a 10-minute window. Effective contractions last 30 to 40 seconds. Intrauterine pressure assessment using a catheter is commonly used to measure the strength or intensity of uterine contractions in patients with ruptured membranes. This technique involves inserting a catheter through the cervix and into the uterus, which allows for direct measurement of intrauterine pressure. This monitoring employs Montevideo units (MVUs) as measurements of contraction intensity. MVUs are calculated by adding the sum of the net contraction pressures over 10 minutes.
Adequate uterine activity is targeted at 200 to 250 MVUs.[23] Although this method of assessing uterine contractions has limitations, a more valuable and accurate system has yet to be devised. Electrohysterography is a recent technique that uses externally applied abdominal electrodes to monitor and record the electrical voltages generated by myometrial contractions. This method of assessing uterine contractility is not currently part of standard clinical practice.[23]
Evaluating the fetal position is another crucial component of intrapartum care and management. Several studies' results have shown increased adverse outcomes when the fetus is in an occiput posterior position, including a more prolonged second stage of labor and increased cesarean delivery rate. Randomized trial results have shown that manual rotation of the fetus from an occiput posterior position to an occiput anterior position can reduce the length of the second stage of labor. Manual rotation is more effective than maternal repositioning in labor for rotating the fetal head, and it involves less technical skill and lower risk than instrumental rotation.[24]
Treatment / Management
Abnormal labor progression is associated with multiple poor maternal and fetal outcomes. Therefore, active management is crucial to prevent adverse outcomes for the mother and the baby. Most labor and delivery units have an established protocol for administering oxytocin to augment inadequate contractions. This entails administering the proper medication, dosage, and criteria for an incremental increase as clinically warranted. These protocols also include monitoring maternal and fetal status for adverse events. With a protracted or arrested second stage of labor, operative vaginal delivery with either forceps or vacuum by a skilled obstetric professional may be an option to expedite delivery. Cesarean delivery may be necessary in prolonged labor, protraction, and arrest, especially during the active phase of labor. Manual placental extraction may be required for a prolonged third stage of labor.
Prolonged or Protracted First Stage
Latent Phase
- The latent phase can last for many hours or even days. Hence, the decision to admit the patient to the hospital depends on various factors, including the patient's cervical status, emotional state, associated complications, tolerance to pain, and physical distance from the hospital. Increased obstetrical interventions have been associated with admission during the latent phase of labor. Therefore, it is imperative to consider the options of admission versus continued outpatient management of the latent phase of labor.[25]
- Therapeutic rest may be considered if desired. Morphine may be administered intramuscularly and intravenously simultaneously at 5 to 10 mg, with a maximum total dose of 20 mg. Alternatively, intramuscular morphine sulfate and promethazine may be used.[26]
- Oxytocin and amniotomy may be helpful in actively treating a prolonged latent phase.
- Propranolol use does not increase the chances of vaginal delivery or shorten the time to delivery in nulliparous patients with a prolonged latent phase of labor.[27]
- When both maternal and fetal conditions are stable, cesarean delivery for failed induction during the latent phase can often be avoided. Current ACOG recommendations suggest continuing oxytocin infusion for a minimum of 12 to 18 hours following membrane rupture before determining that the induction was unsuccessful. Beyond this timeframe, the decision to extend induction efforts should be guided by individual clinical factors, patient preferences, and a thorough discussion of the potential risks and benefits.[5] Most patients in the latent phase of labor, even when prolonged, will achieve a vaginal delivery with continuation of the induction.[5] (A1)
Active Phase
- For women with a prolonged or protracted active phase of the first stage, oxytocin may be administered, and an amniotomy may be performed.
- Suppose there has been no cervical change after 4 hours of adequate uterine contractions (>200 MVUs) and ruptured membranes or 6 hours with adequate uterine contractions, ruptured membranes, and oxytocin augmentation. In that case, it is advisable to proceed with cesarean delivery.
- However, if labor progresses slowly or normally, oxytocin administration is continued.
Protracted or Arrested Second Stage
- Oxytocin augmentation is started for minimal (<1 cm) or absent descent after 60 to 90 minutes of maternal pushing with less frequent uterine contractions.
- Without epidural anesthesia, nulliparous women can push for at least 3 hours and multiparous women for at least 2 hours before considering operative intervention. As long as the fetus continues to descend and/or rotate to a favorable position for spontaneous vaginal delivery and the fetal heart rate tracing is reassuring, any operative intervention should be delayed.
- If necessary, manual rotation of the fetus from an occiput posterior presentation to an occiput anterior presentation can be attempted in a protracted second stage.
- An additional hour of pushing may be allowed in women with epidural anesthesia before considering operative intervention.
- Operative vaginal delivery may be utilized before proceeding to cesarean delivery when the second stage of labor is protracted.[5][28] (A1)
European Guidelines for Managing Arrested or Protracted Labor in Nulliparous Women in the First Stage of Labor at Term
In 2022, an expert panel convened by the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, including obstetricians, gynecologists, midwives, and patient representatives from 9 European countries, developed evidence-based clinical guidelines for managing labor. Supported by the Knowledge Institute of the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists, the panel focused on 5 priority clinical questions concerning term, nulliparous women with a singleton fetus in cephalic presentation experiencing arrested or protracted labor due to inadequate uterine contractions. Key recommendations include considering amniotomy as an initial intervention and discussing the timing of oxytocin administration, immediate versus delayed, with patients, as current evidence does not clearly favor 1 approach.
A shared decision-making model is emphasized, incorporating clinical judgment and patient preferences. When oxytocin is indicated, a low-dose regimen is recommended for labor augmentation. Importantly, amniotomy should generally precede oxytocin infusion during the first stage of spontaneous labor. Before proceeding to operative delivery, at least 4 hours of oxytocin augmentation with adequate uterine contractions should be attempted, provided maternal and fetal conditions remain stable. These guidelines aim to promote safe, individualized, and evidence-based labor management, improving outcomes for both mothers and infants. Similarly, the WHO recommends both amniotomy and oxytocin for labor augmentation, without using amniotomy alone. In many countries, amniotomy is typically performed as the initial intervention, and if there is no noticeable progress within 1 to 2 hours, intravenous oxytocin is then initiated to support labor advancement.[29]
Differential Diagnosis
When evaluating abnormal labor, it is essential to consider a broad differential diagnosis to identify underlying causes that may impede normal progression. A structured approach to the differential diagnosis helps clinicians distinguish correctable conditions from those requiring intervention, ultimately optimizing obstetric outcomes. The differential diagnosis of abnormal labor includes the following:
- Abdominal pain
- Bandl ring
- Braxton Hicks contractions
- Cervical stenosis
- Chorioamnionitis
- Placental abruption
- Premature rupture of membranes
- Prodromal labor
- Uterine Mullerian anomaly
- Uterine rupture
Prognosis
The prognosis of abnormal labor varies according to the stage. With a prolonged first-stage latent phase of labor, intervention with amniotomy and oxytocin can be helpful and allow normal progression for the remainder of labor. These same strategies may be utilized in cases of abnormalities during the active phase of the first stage of labor. A recent randomized controlled trial of early amniotomy, within 1 hour of cervical balloon catheter expulsion, shows over 2 times faster labor than waiting longer to perform amniotomy in term patients induced with mechanical cervical ripening.[30]
Maternal and neonatal morbidity is associated with a prolonged first stage of labor, including maternal fever from endometritis, shoulder dystocia, hemorrhage, and blood transfusion.[31][32] A prolonged latent phase reaching the 90th percentile or higher in individuals who progress to active labor is linked to a higher risk of maternal complications, independent of whether a cesarean delivery occurs. An increase in third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations, cesarean delivery, and a prolonged hospital stay is associated with a protracted or arrested second stage of labor.[32][33]
Additionally, when a prolonged latent phase occurs during spontaneous labor, it is associated with an elevated risk of adverse neonatal outcomes.[34] The fetus has an increased risk of neonatal intensive care unit admission, low Apgar scores, and a need for assisted ventilation with abnormal labor.[33] Operative vaginal delivery may expedite the abnormal labor process in certain situations. Based on the recommended criteria, cesarean delivery is indicated with abnormal labor in the first and second stages.[35] Current methods to prevent injury, blood loss, and infection result in a good prognosis when cesarean delivery is necessitated.[24]
Complications
Roughly 20% of labor is associated with prolongation, protraction, or an arrest abnormality. Various adverse maternal and fetal outcomes are associated with labor abnormalities. Infection, operative birth, low Apgar score at 5 minutes, prolonged hospitalization for both mother and baby, third- and fourth-degree maternal perineal lacerations, above-average blood loss, and neonatal intensive care unit admission are all increased with abnormal labor progress.[36]
With abnormal labor being the main indication for cesarean delivery during labor, the perceived safety of the cesarean delivery must be addressed. With the increasing rate of cesarean deliveries in the United States, there has been a concomitant increase in abnormal placentation, specifically placenta accreta and placenta previa, as well as cesarean scar pregnancies. Along with these complications come a parallel rise in maternal morbidity and mortality, as placenta accreta and placenta previa account for a large percentage of maternal morbidity and mortality.[37]
Deterrence and Patient Education
Educating and reassuring patients about appropriate management during labor is of utmost importance to prevent maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality resulting from prolonged, protracted, and arrested labor. Pregnant individuals should be aware of possible interventions recommended during labor to prevent abnormal labor, including oxytocin augmentation, amniotomy, and manual rotation of the fetal head when appropriate. Patients are encouraged to participate in their prenatal care and labor and delivery actively. Setting realistic patient expectations involves recognizing that the birthing experience is inherently unpredictable, with the primary objective being the attainment of a healthy outcome for both the mother and baby.
Staying active through regular exercise during pregnancy benefits both the mother and fetus. At least 1 randomized controlled trial's results have shown that walking in late pregnancy may decrease the need for labor induction, as well as operative vaginal delivery and cesarean section.[38] Taking steps to avoid significant weight gain in pregnancy, associated with gestational diabetes and fetal macrosomia, may help decrease the risks of abnormal labor.[39]
Making informed decisions about the timing of labor induction can contribute to optimizing the labor process. Having a reliable support person and maintaining adequate nutrition and hydration during labor may also help reduce the occurrence of abnormal labor. Dysfunctional labor can be a frightening experience for patients. Adopting a disciplined interprofessional team approach to identifying and managing abnormal labor will lead to the most favorable outcomes for both the mother and baby.
Pearls and Other Issues
Abnormal labor, or dystocia, is commonly caused by issues with the passenger (fetus), pelvis, or power (contractions); this may present as prolonged or arrested labor, and management includes monitoring, augmentation with oxytocin, or operative delivery if necessary. Key pitfalls include delayed recognition of arrest, misuse of oxytocin, and failure to assess fetal-pelvic compatibility. Prevention involves early risk identification, adequate labor support, and timely intervention when labor progress stalls.
Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes
The appropriate management of all stages of labor is complex and, at times, challenging. The best labor management requires a coordinated interprofessional effort among trained obstetric nurses, midwives, physicians, advanced practice clinicians, anesthesiologists, patients, support persons, and their families. Team management may lower cesarean section rates and improve labor outcomes overall.
Labor is a dynamic process, and the care team's decision may change depending on maternal and fetal factors. Including patients in their treatment planning is mandatory. Collaboration, shared decision-making, and communication are all vital elements for a good outcome. Psychological and emotional support should be provided to patients experiencing labor abnormalities, as these women are at a higher risk of being diagnosed with postpartum depression.
Nurses, clinicians, and other obstetric caregivers face challenges related to care standardization and productivity overload demands. These challenges can potentially hinder the development of strong and meaningful patient relationships, leading to increased insensitivity and burnout among healthcare providers over time.[40] The outcome of abnormal labor depends on the labor stage and the abnormality's etiology. Improved outcomes require interprofessional communication, care coordination, and enhanced team performance with a focus on patient-centered care and safety.
References
LeFevre NM, Krumm E, Cobb WJ. Labor Dystocia in Nulliparous Women. American family physician. 2021 Jan 15:103(2):90-96 [PubMed PMID: 33448772]
Cheng YW, Caughey AB. Defining and Managing Normal and Abnormal Second Stage of Labor. Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America. 2017 Dec:44(4):547-566. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2017.08.009. Epub [PubMed PMID: 29078938]
Clark SL, Garite TJ, Hamilton EF, Belfort MA, Hankins GD. "Doing something" about the cesarean delivery rate. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2018 Sep:219(3):267-271. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.04.044. Epub 2018 May 5 [PubMed PMID: 29733840]
Ubom AE, Nieto-Calvache AJ, Malel ZJ, Nunes I, FIGO Committee on Childbirth and PPH. FIGO position statement on the use of the WHO labor care guide versus the partograph. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 2025 Jul:170(1):25-27. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.70151. Epub 2025 Apr 26 [PubMed PMID: 40285693]
. First and Second Stage Labor Management: ACOG Clinical Practice Guideline No. 8. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2024 Jan 1:143(1):144-162. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005447. Epub [PubMed PMID: 38096556]
Level 1 (high-level) evidencede Vries PLM, Veenstra E, Baud D, Legardeur H, Kallianidis AF, van den Akker T. Time to redefine prolonged third stage of labor? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the length of the third stage of labor and adverse maternal outcome after vaginal birth. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2025 Jan:232(1):26-41.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.07.019. Epub 2024 Jul 19 [PubMed PMID: 39032724]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceCaughey AB, Sharshiner R, Cheng YW. Fetal malposition: impact and management. Clinical obstetrics and gynecology. 2015 Jun:58(2):241-5. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000106. Epub [PubMed PMID: 25851845]
Zhang J, Troendle J, Reddy UM, Laughon SK, Branch DW, Burkman R, Landy HJ, Hibbard JU, Haberman S, Ramirez MM, Bailit JL, Hoffman MK, Gregory KD, Gonzalez-Quintero VH, Kominiarek M, Learman LA, Hatjis CG, van Veldhuisen P, Consortium on Safe Labor. Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2010 Oct:203(4):326.e1-326.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.058. Epub 2010 Aug 12 [PubMed PMID: 20708166]
Gupta R, Nageeb EM, Minhas I, Dang N, Mock SA, Rivera J, Ballas DA. Emergent Cesarean Section in a Bandl's Ring Patient: An Obstetrics and Gynecology Simulation Scenario. Cureus. 2018 Dec 31:10(12):e3800. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3800. Epub 2018 Dec 31 [PubMed PMID: 30868014]
Lowe NK. A review of factors associated with dystocia and cesarean section in nulliparous women. Journal of midwifery & women's health. 2007 May-Jun:52(3):216-28 [PubMed PMID: 17467588]
Pavličev M, Romero R, Mitteroecker P. Evolution of the human pelvis and obstructed labor: new explanations of an old obstetrical dilemma. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2020 Jan:222(1):3-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.06.043. Epub 2019 Jun 25 [PubMed PMID: 31251927]
Abalos E, Chamillard M, Díaz V, Pasquale J, Souza JP. Progression of the first stage of spontaneous labour. Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology. 2020 Aug:67():19-32. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.03.001. Epub 2020 Mar 7 [PubMed PMID: 32247770]
. Obstetric care consensus no. 1: safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2014 Mar:123(3):693-711. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000444441.04111.1d. Epub [PubMed PMID: 24553167]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceAngarita AM, Berghella V. Evidence-based labor management: third stage of labor (part 5). American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM. 2022 Sep:4(5):100661. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100661. Epub 2022 May 7 [PubMed PMID: 35537683]
Caughey AB. Is Zhang the new Friedman: How should we evaluate the first stage of labor? Seminars in perinatology. 2020 Mar:44(2):151215. doi: 10.1016/j.semperi.2019.151215. Epub 2019 Nov 23 [PubMed PMID: 32067749]
Nachum Z, Garmi G, Kadan Y, Zafran N, Shalev E, Salim R. Comparison between amniotomy, oxytocin or both for augmentation of labor in prolonged latent phase: a randomized controlled trial. Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E. 2010 Nov 7:8():136. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-8-136. Epub 2010 Nov 7 [PubMed PMID: 21054896]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceWatkins VY, O'Donnell CM, Perez M, Zhao P, England S, Carter EB, Kelly JC, Frolova A, Raghuraman N. The impact of physical activity during pregnancy on labor and delivery. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2021 Oct:225(4):437.e1-437.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.05.036. Epub 2021 Jun 1 [PubMed PMID: 34081895]
Wathes DC, Borwick SC, Timmons PM, Leung ST, Thornton S. Oxytocin receptor expression in human term and preterm gestational tissues prior to and following the onset of labour. The Journal of endocrinology. 1999 Apr:161(1):143-51 [PubMed PMID: 10194538]
Sundin C, Mazac L, Ellis K, Garbo C. Implementation of an Oxytocin Checklist to Improve Clinical Outcomes. MCN. The American journal of maternal child nursing. 2018 May/Jun:43(3):133-138. doi: 10.1097/NMC.0000000000000428. Epub [PubMed PMID: 29489527]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceHobson SR, Abdelmalek MZ, Farine D. Update on uterine tachysystole. Journal of perinatal medicine. 2019 Feb 25:47(2):152-160. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2018-0175. Epub [PubMed PMID: 30352043]
Lee HJ, Macbeth AH, Pagani JH, Young WS 3rd. Oxytocin: the great facilitator of life. Progress in neurobiology. 2009 Jun:88(2):127-51. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2009.04.001. Epub 2009 Apr 10 [PubMed PMID: 19482229]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceCohen WR, Friedman EA. Clinical evaluation of labor: an evidence- and experience-based approach. Journal of perinatal medicine. 2021 Mar 26:49(3):241-253. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2020-0256. Epub 2020 Oct 19 [PubMed PMID: 33068385]
Cohen WR. Clinical assessment of uterine contractions. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 2017 Nov:139(2):137-142. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12270. Epub 2017 Aug 11 [PubMed PMID: 28727889]
Bertholdt C, Morel O, Zuily S, Ambroise-Grandjean G. Manual rotation of occiput posterior or transverse positions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2022 Jun:226(6):781-793. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.11.033. Epub 2021 Nov 17 [PubMed PMID: 34800396]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceSeravalli V, Strambi N, Castellana E, Salamina MA, Bettini C, Di Tommaso M. Hospital Admission in the Latent versus the Active Phase of Labor: Comparison of Perinatal Outcomes. Children (Basel, Switzerland). 2022 Jun 20:9(6):. doi: 10.3390/children9060924. Epub 2022 Jun 20 [PubMed PMID: 35740861]
Maykin MM, Ukoha EP, Tilp V, Gaw SL, Lewkowitz AK. Impact of therapeutic rest in early labor on perinatal outcomes: a prospective study. American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM. 2021 May:3(3):100325. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100325. Epub 2021 Feb 2 [PubMed PMID: 33545440]
Fonge YN, Slagle HBG, Caplan RJ, Myers EL, Portillo R, Sciscione AC. A randomized controlled trial of propranolol in nulliparous patients with prolonged labor. American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM. 2025 Jul:7(7):101698. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101698. Epub 2025 May 9 [PubMed PMID: 40350034]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceGimovsky AC. Defining arrest in the first and second stages of labor. Minerva obstetrics and gynecology. 2021 Feb:73(1):6-18. doi: 10.23736/S2724-606X.20.04644-4. Epub 2020 Sep 3 [PubMed PMID: 32882117]
Duvekot JJ, Ayres-de-Campos D, Brismar Wendel S, Daskalakis G, Dehaene I, Kacerovsky M, Kehl S, Glavind J, Hamza A, Ledingham MA, Magowan B, Mestdagh E, Wilsens I, Veenstra-Kwakkel S, van Ee I, Stenbäck P, Matteo C, Labeur Y, Middelhuis D, Niesink-Boerboom L, Tuijtelaars J, van der Lee JH, European Association of Perinatal Medicine. European guidelines on management of arrested or protracted labor in nulliparous women. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology. 2025 Jul:311():114064. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.114064. Epub 2025 May 17 [PubMed PMID: 40398142]
Gomez Slagle HB, Fonge YN, Caplan R, Pfeuti CK, Sciscione AC, Hoffman MK. Early vs expectant artificial rupture of membranes following Foley catheter ripening: a randomized controlled trial. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2022 May:226(5):724.e1-724.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.11.1368. Epub 2022 Feb 6 [PubMed PMID: 35135684]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceHarper LM, Caughey AB, Roehl KA, Odibo AO, Cahill AG. Defining an abnormal first stage of labor based on maternal and neonatal outcomes. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2014 Jun:210(6):536.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.12.027. Epub 2013 Dec 19 [PubMed PMID: 24361789]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceBlankenship SA, Raghuraman N, Delhi A, Woolfolk CL, Wang Y, Macones GA, Cahill AG. Association of abnormal first stage of labor duration and maternal and neonatal morbidity. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2020 Sep:223(3):445.e1-445.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.06.053. Epub [PubMed PMID: 32883453]
Wang L, Wang H, Jia L, Qing W, Li F, Zhou J. The impact of stage of labor on adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in multiparous women: a retrospective cohort study. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2020 Oct 7:20(1):596. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03286-z. Epub 2020 Oct 7 [PubMed PMID: 33028253]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceBurd J, Woolfolk C, Dombrowski M, Carter EB, Kelly JC, Frolova A, Odibo A, Cahill AG, Raghuraman N. Risks Associated with Prolonged Latent Phase of Labor. American journal of perinatology. 2025 May:42(7):827-833. doi: 10.1055/a-2419-9283. Epub 2024 Sep 24 [PubMed PMID: 39317213]
Hofmeyr GJ, Singata-Madliki M. The second stage of labor. Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology. 2020 Aug:67():53-64. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.03.012. Epub 2020 Apr 7 [PubMed PMID: 32360366]
Pospiech K, Czajkowski K. Amniotic fluid lactate level as a diagnostic tool for prolonged labour. Journal of mother and child. 2020 Dec 3:24(3):3-7. doi: 10.34763/jmotherandchild.20202403.2027.d-20-00011. Epub 2020 Dec 3 [PubMed PMID: 33470958]
Antoine C, Young BK. Cesarean section one hundred years 1920-2020: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly. Journal of perinatal medicine. 2020 Sep 4:49(1):5-16. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2020-0305. Epub 2020 Sep 4 [PubMed PMID: 32887190]
Shojaei B, Loripoor M, Sheikhfathollahi M, Aminzadeh F. The effect of walking during late pregnancy on the outcomes of labor and delivery: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of education and health promotion. 2021:10():277. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1437_20. Epub 2021 Jul 30 [PubMed PMID: 34485574]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceTeede HJ, Bailey C, Moran LJ, Bahri Khomami M, Enticott J, Ranasinha S, Rogozinska E, Skouteris H, Boyle JA, Thangaratinam S, Harrison CL. Association of Antenatal Diet and Physical Activity-Based Interventions With Gestational Weight Gain and Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA internal medicine. 2022 Feb 1:182(2):106-114. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.6373. Epub [PubMed PMID: 34928300]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceHaahr A, Norlyk A, Martinsen B, Dreyer P. Nurses experiences of ethical dilemmas: A review. Nursing ethics. 2020 Feb:27(1):258-272. doi: 10.1177/0969733019832941. Epub 2019 Apr 11 [PubMed PMID: 30975034]