Tools
Hyperacusis
Introduction
Hyperacusis is a rare disorder of loudness perception in which sounds that are typically considered harmless become intolerable.[1] The Hyperacusis Network uses the description "decreased sound tolerance." Patients may experience innocuous sounds as painful, frightening, unpleasant, or excessively loud.[2] Hyperacusis frequently co-occurs with tinnitus and can induce considerable distress; patients consistently report impairments in their social, occupational, and recreational activities.[3] Avoiding sound sources and seeking medical attention are common behaviors.[4] Hyperacusis is a distinct diagnosis from phonophobia and misophonia. A fear-based aversion to sound characterizes phonophobia, whereas misophonia involves intense negative emotions, such as anger or disgust, in response to specific trigger sounds, in contrast to the generalized loudness intolerance that defines hyperacusis.
Hyperacusis is a symptom that includes an emotional and psychological component, as patients may experience apprehension about sound exposure and engage in avoidance behaviors, in addition to a physiological component involving changes in the central auditory system, such as increased gain.[5] Hyperacusis can have a marked adverse impact on quality of life. Although a definitive cure has not yet been found, research in this area is progressing rapidly, and the number of peer-reviewed studies on the condition has increased 10-fold over the past 40 years.[6]
Etiology
Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Search engine and full access to all medical articles- 10 free questions in your specialty
- Free CME/CE Activities
- Free daily question in your email
- Save favorite articles to your dashboard
- Emails offering discounts
Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care
Etiology
While the precise etiology of a patient's hyperacusis is often challenging to determine, a range of clinical conditions have been associated with its presentation.[1] These associations can be organized into the following categories:
Clinical Conditions Involving the Peripheral Auditory System
- Noise-induced hearing loss (most common)
- Bell palsy
- Ramsey-Hunt syndrome
- Recruitment
- Recruitment refers to abnormally rapid growth of perceived loudness due to cochlear outer hair cell dysfunction.
- While it may resemble hyperacusis clinically, recruitment is a separate peripheral mechanism rather than true loudness intolerance.[9]
- Stapedectomy
- Perilymphatic fistula
- Acute acoustic trauma
- Ménière disease
Clinical Conditions Involving the Central Nervous System
- Migraine
- Major depression
- Functional disorders (eg, fibromyalgia, myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome)
- Autism spectrum disorder
- Attention-deficit/hyperreactivity disorder
- Generalized anxiety disorder [10]
- Post-traumatic stress disorder
- Head injury
- Learning disabilities and stuttering
- Williams syndrome
- Williams syndrome is a rare neurodevelopmental disorder caused by multiple gene deletions on chromosome 7.
- Up to 90% of individuals with Williams syndrome experience hyperacusis symptoms.[11]
- Tinnitus
- Spinal cord disorders
- Joint and back disorders [4][12]
- Brain lesions causing mass effect
Hormonal and infectious diseases
- Addison disease
- Panhypopituitarism
- Hyperthyroidism
- Lyme disease
- Neurosyphilis
Others
- Temporomandibular joint syndrome
Epidemiology
The prevalence of hyperacusis among children and adolescents is estimated to range from 3.2% to 17.1%, with substantial variability attributable to differences in age and hearing status.[13][14] In adults, prevalence rates have ranged from 8% to 15.2%.[4][15] Some evidence suggests that advanced age, female sex, and higher education are associated with increased prevalence of hyperacusis.[4] Estimating the prevalence of hyperacusis is difficult because its presentation is inherently subjective and depends on well-defined screening measures.[6] As with tinnitus, the existing literature is marked by substantial variation in study design and methodology, hindering meaningful comparison across studies.[16]
Pathophysiology
Hyperacusis occurs across a heterogeneous patient population, including individuals with sensorineural hearing loss and those without measurable hearing loss on audiometry.[17] Accordingly, multiple non–mutually exclusive mechanisms have been proposed to account for its pathophysiology. These hypotheses span neurochemical modulation, central auditory neuroplasticity, altered cochlear input, mechanical factors, and conditions that disrupt neuromuscular regulation of the middle ear.
Neurochemical Modulation Hypotheses
5-hydroxytryptamine hypothesis [18]
Serotonergic pathways appear to modulate auditory gain and the perception of sound significance.[19][20] Dysregulation of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) signaling has been linked to conditions frequently comorbid with hyperacusis, including tinnitus, photophobia, migraine, depression, and benzodiazepine dependence. Dysfunctional 5-HT signaling may also contribute to heightened auditory responsiveness in syndromic disorders such as Williams syndrome, which also frequently presents with conductive hearing loss (though the high incidence of otitis media with effusion in patients with Williams syndrome may be a confounding variable in this case).[1][11][18] However, current evidence does not support a causal role for serotonergic disturbance in nonsyndromic hyperacusis.[21] The 5-HT hypothesis conceptually overlaps with central gain models (discussed below) but emphasizes neuromodulatory influences as potential upstream contributors.
Neuroactive opioid peptides hypothesis
A related neurochemical model posits that aberrant signaling across interconnected auditory and nonauditory neural networks contributes to the development of tinnitus and hyperacusis.[22] Enhanced central gain can be evaluated using auditory evoked potentials at different levels of the auditory pathway, and the measured amplitudes frequently correlate with anxiety, stress, and depression scores. These findings suggest that comorbid psychological factors may predispose affected patients to tinnitus or hyperacusis.[23][24][25] Neuroactive opioid peptides are proposed as potential modulators within these networks, though direct mechanistic evidence remains limited.
Auditory System Plasticity and Gain-Related Hypotheses
Plasticity of the ascending auditory system hypothesis
The auditory system demonstrates substantial capacity for neural plasticity, reorganizing in response to reduced, increased, and conditioned sound input.[26] Long-term noise exposure or injury to the peripheral auditory system may trigger compensatory central changes that alter auditory perception, which may contribute to the clinical manifestations of tinnitus and hyperacusis.[27] Pharmacologic modulation of this pathway, as observed with L-baclofen and its corresponding reduction of excitation in the ascending auditory pathway, further supports the role of neuroplasticity in hyperactive auditory disorders such as hyperacusis and suggests a potential therapeutic target.[28]
Reduced gamma-aminobutyric acid–mediated inhibition in the inferior colliculus following tone exposure may also impact temporal integration and subsequent loudness perception.[27] Neuroplasticity in the auditory cortex may also give rise to hyperacusis, as suggested by findings of heightened neural synchrony and changes in the tonotopic map seen in patients with conditions such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD) who are experiencing hyperacusis (though hyperacusis in ASD is believed to be multifactorial, potentially also impacted by mild cochlear problems and a less effective efferent system).[12][29] The plasticity of the central auditory system supports the rationale for sound therapy as a potential treatment for hyperacusis.
Cochlear hypothesis [30]
The cochlear hypothesis focuses on a reduced loudness discomfort level (LDL),[30] the point at which a subject perceives a sound as uncomfortably loud. In patients with hyperacusis, LDL is reduced by 16 to 18 decibels (dB) relative to the general population, whose average LDL is approximately 100 dB.[5][29][5][31] This reduction occurs across the frequency spectrum and is independent of the degree of hearing loss, supporting the hypothesis that increased auditory gain due to loss of peripheral input is the underlying mechanism of hyperacusis, rather than cochlear recruitment.[32]
Hyperacusis thus differs from recruitment, which requires an elevated perception threshold (eg, due to hair cell damage), and from misophonia, which involves sound-specific emotional triggers.[1][33] Peripheral injury from noise exposure or ototoxic drugs reduces cochlear output but paradoxically increases neural activity in higher auditory centers at suprathreshold levels.[34] This phenomenon suggests that tinnitus and hyperacusis may represent perceptual consequences of this maladaptive gain response.
Central auditory gain model
Closely related to the cochlear hypothesis, the central auditory gain model proposes that reduced peripheral input leads to maladaptive increases in central neuronal gain, resulting in over-amplification of sound-evoked activity and excessive loudness perception.[32][35][32][36][37] This model introduces the concept of "hidden hearing loss," in which patients exhibit normal audiometric thresholds but show evidence of subtle deficits in synaptic or neural encoding, resulting in disrupted auditory perception. These gain-enhancing processes are believed to contribute to both tinnitus and hyperacusis.
Mechanical and Anatomical Contributors
Stapes hypermobility
Mechanical factors may also contribute to the pathophysiology of hyperacusis in certain patients. Hypermobility of the stapes has been proposed as a contributor to abnormal sound transmission, and preliminary evidence suggests excess temporalis tissue reinforcement of the stapes, along with round-window reinforcement, may offer symptomatic relief as a minimally invasive surgical option for patients with hyperacusis.[38]
Facial nerve (CN VII) paralysis
Conditions that impair facial nerve function (eg, Bell palsy, Remsay-Hunt syndrome, Lyme disease) can disrupt the normal dampening effect of the stapedius muscle. Loss of this protective reflex may increase perceived sound intensity and contribute to hyperacusis in affected individuals.[1]
Temporomandibular joint disorders
Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders may influence sound sensitivity through their anatomical proximity to the ear and shared neural pathways with the facial nerve. TMJ dysfunction or inflammation can produce altered auditory sensations and contribute to sound intolerance in some patients.[39]
History and Physical
The subjectivity of hyperacusis has led to several definitions in the literature, with the condition typically classified into four categories: loudness, annoyance, fear, and pain.[2] Significantly, these categories frequently overlap in clinical practice, with many individuals demonstrating mixed presentations rather than fitting neatly into a single subtype. The categories are as follows:
- Loudness hyperacusis is characterized by a generalized perception of everyday sounds as excessively loud or overwhelming, even when the volume is at a level that most people tolerate without difficulty.
- Annoyance hyperacusis, closely related to misophonia, refers to disproportionate irritability or affective distress in response to everyday sounds that feel intrusive, despite their typical acoustic properties. Annoyance hyperacusis is distinguished from misophonia because the latter is characterized by intense, selective emotional reactions to specific trigger sounds, reflecting a conditioned, stimulus-specific response rather than a generalized intolerance to sound.
- Fear hyperacusis is characterized by sound-related anticipatory anxiety that may lead to avoidance of environments where sound exposure is expected. Fear hyperacusis is sometimes conflated with phonophobia, though phonophobia is a distinct phobic disorder in which the fear response is not driven by abnormal sound sensitivity but instead reflects a conditioned, disproportionate fear of sound or the possibility of sound exposure.
- Pain hyperacusis, sometimes called noxacusis, is defined by the experience of physical pain elicited by sounds that are not ordinarily painful; patients with pain hyperacusis describe sharp, burning, or pressure-like pain around the ear and face, which can be debilitating.[40]
Hyperacusis commonly co-occurs with tinnitus; although the 2 conditions may share mechanisms, they have distinct features:
- Hyperacusis is almost exclusively bilateral, whereas tinnitus can be unilateral or highly lateralized.
- Somatic modulation—where changes in head, jaw, or neck position alter perception—is rare in hyperacusis and relatively common in tinnitus.[41]
- Hyperacusis is generally persistent, while tinnitus may be intermittent or continuous depending on its etiology.
- Hyperacusis involves abnormal intolerance to sound, whereas tinnitus involves perception of sound in the absence of an external source.
- Unlike tinnitus, which can sometimes be managed with masking or sound therapy, hyperacusis typically requires structured sound desensitization and is not alleviated by simple self-help strategies.
A detailed patient history is essential to elicit any associated psychiatric symptoms and any potential risk factors, including noise exposure and acoustic trauma. A comprehensive head and neck exam is vital for identifying any clinical signs of underlying conditions, some of which are reversible. Otoscopy and pneumatoscopy are also critical, and cranial nerve assessment can detect facial nerve dysfunction.[42] In cases of unilateral symptoms, it is advisable to consider alternative etiologies, such as acoustic shock associated with tensor tympani syndrome.
Evaluation
Hyperacusis is a symptom and is therefore subjective; as such, subjective measures are used in its evaluation. The diagnosis of hyperacusis typically involves measuring LDL with pure-tone audiometry and using questionnaires to evaluate disease severity.[6][29] Many questionnaires exist; the most widely used is the Hyperacusis Questionnaire (HQ); other options include the Geräuschüberempfindlichkeits-Fragebogen and the Multiple Activity Scale for Hyperacusis.[29][43][44] There is no consensus on diagnostic cut-off values for either LDL or HQ; however, when combined, the results are more sensitive.[29] Ninety-five percent of patients diagnosed with hyperacusis have an LDL of 77 dB or lower (compared to the general population's average LDL of 100 dB) and an HQ score of 22 or higher.[45] Unfortunately, these tools only affirm whether hyperacusis is present, not its impact on a patient’s life.[29]
In evaluating a patient with hyperacusis, most clinicians also perform tympanometry, acoustic reflex testing, and speech discrimination testing to exclude otologic causes. No laboratory studies, radiographs, or other objective diagnostic tests are routinely used. Based on the history and physical examination, clinicians may order further investigations if an alternative underlying cause is suspected, such as serological testing for Lyme disease or high-resolution computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging of the brain in patients with facial paralysis.[42]
Given the subjective nature of this assessment, it is crucial to ensure that the evaluation does not cause undue discomfort for the patient or lead to a subsequent breakdown in clinical rapport. Clinicians should also be mindful of the fact that hyperacusis often presents in conjunction with psychiatric disorders. For the evaluation of mental health concerns in patients, the following questionnaires are recommended.[29]
- Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale
- Short Health Anxiety Inventory
- Mini-Social Phobia Inventory
- Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory–Revised
- Penn State Worry Questionnaire–Abbreviated
- Patient Health Questionnaire
Treatment / Management
Treatment for hyperacusis can generally be divided into those that target the physical mechanisms and those that aim to lessen the psychological burden of the condition.
Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is one of the most effective components of hyperacusis therapy alongside counseling and education.[3] By providing patients with techniques for managing emotional responses to sound, CBT has been shown to increase LDL and reduce hyperacusis severity, as assessed by the HQ.[46][47] Directive counseling uses a similar approach to identifying and discussing repressed behaviors, although much of the literature focuses on its use in tinnitus.[42](A1)
Tinnitus retraining therapy involves educating patients about their condition and gradually enriching their auditory environment; its use in hyperacusis is increasingly common.[46] Prolonged low-level noise exposure has been shown to reverse the enhanced neural gain, which is thought to be at least one underlying mechanism of hyperacusis.[48] Significant improvements in LDL have been seen after 6 months of sound generator therapy. Increasing the mean level of the acoustic environment (ie, greater auditory stimulation) has been reported to have a beneficial effect on symptoms.[49][50](B2)
Surgery may be indicated in rare cases, including those refractory to the aforementioned treatments, or in conductive hyperacusis secondary to superior canal dehiscence syndrome, in which vestibular symptoms are triggered by sound or pressure due to a defect in the superior semicircular canal.[51][52] Patients with this condition often report hyperacusis, pulsatile tinnitus (ie, hearing their heartbeat in the ear or head), low-frequency hearing loss, dizziness caused by sound or pressure, autophonia (ie, hearing their own voice reverberate internally), or orbital tinnitus (ie, hearing their own eye movements).[53] Diagnosis relies heavily on imaging and vestibular-evoked myogenic potential testing.[54] Surgical treatment is considered only for those with severe, debilitating symptoms.[55] Another promising alternative may be round- and oval-window reinforcement in patients with persistently distressing hyperacusis or autophony due to underlying third-window phenomena, such as semicircular canal dehiscence, perilymphatic fistula, or enlargement of the vestibular aqueduct.(B3)
Alternative treatments are often considered for patients with chronic pain related to hyperacusis. These may include supplements, vitamins, acupuncture, exercise, yoga, meditation, massage, relaxation therapy, and hypnosis. Current research provides insufficient evidence to support the effectiveness of these complementary methods, and all patients should be counseled to balance these approaches with evidence-based interventions to ensure safe and comprehensive care.
Differential Diagnosis
The primary differential diagnoses to consider in a patient presenting with decreased sound tolerance are misophonia and phonophobia. In addition, the following underlying conditions must be ruled out:
- Bell palsy
- Ramsay-Hunt syndrome
- Migraine
- Lyme disease
- Neurosyphilis
- Williams syndrome
- Post-traumatic stress disorder
- Depression
- Superior canal dehiscence syndrome
- Autism
- Cri-du-Chat syndrome
- Tay-Sach disease
- Temporomandibular joint disorders
- Fibromyalgia [1]
Prognosis
The prognosis for hyperacusis varies widely and is influenced by its underlying etiology. Individuals with hyperacusis experience a broad range of symptom severity and functional impact and often experience greater impairment on average than those with tinnitus. Patient reports, such as those found in online forums, suggest that symptoms are chronic for some individuals.
However, these sources may overrepresent those with ongoing challenges, as people who improve are less likely to remain engaged in such communities.[2][6] Hyperacusis can also have a significant psychological impact; in one study, 13% of patients reported thoughts of suicide or self-harm, emphasizing the importance of routine screening for anxiety and depression.[56] Young adults (ages 18–29) may be at increased risk of developing hyperacusis due to higher rates of hazardous noise exposure, and they may also be particularly vulnerable to its psychological effects during this stage of life.[57]
Complications
Complications of hyperacusis vary with the specific etiology, as hyperacusis itself does not produce additional physical consequences. However, the psychological impact of hyperacusis is a source of significant morbidity. Some patients experience thoughts of suicide or self-harm, which underscores the importance of close follow-up and routine mental health screening in the management of hyperacusis.
Deterrence and Patient Education
Patient education plays a crucial role in the management of hyperacusis, whether provided independently or as a component of cognitive behavioral therapy or tinnitus retraining therapy. Patients should be educated about their condition, test results, fundamental physiology, coping strategies, and relaxation techniques.[3][58] Group education sessions can be beneficial and provide an opportunity for patients with hyperacusis to connect and share their experiences.[59]
Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes
Hyperacusis is a multifaceted condition that presents significant challenges in both diagnosis and management. The absence of established clinical guidelines for the evaluation and treatment of hyperacusis underscores the critical need for interprofessional collaboration and further research to enhance the understanding of hyperacusis and improve patient outcomes. Implementing a strategic approach that incorporates evidence-based techniques, current audiology research, and individualized care plans tailored to each patient’s unique circumstances is vital. Successful management of hyperacusis relies on the concerted efforts of a diverse interprofessional team, including primary care clinicians, otolaryngologists, advanced practice providers, audiologists, nurses, pharmacists, and occupational therapists.
The otolaryngologist plays a pivotal role in the initial evaluation of patients with hyperacusis and collaborates closely with audiologists, specialist nurses, and clinical psychologists. In specific cases, involvement from radiologists, neurosurgeons, and maxillofacial surgeons may also be warranted. These specialists depend on a thorough and accurate evaluation conducted by the otolaryngologist. The audiologist brings expertise in audiometric testing, notably pure-tone audiometry, tympanometry, and speech discrimination testing, which is essential for diagnostic purposes. After thorough assessment and treatment of any underlying conditions, hyperacusis can typically be managed in a community setting; however, those with particularly severe symptoms may require continued care from an otolaryngologist. Specialist nurses often provide patient education and information, and clinical psychologists deliver cognitive-behavioral therapy.
Ethical considerations are paramount in determining the evaluation and treatment plan, and patient autonomy should be a key element of the decision-making process. Care coordination is critical to ensuring a seamless, practical patient experience. Interprofessional coordination minimizes the potential for errors, reduces delays, and enhances patient safety, ultimately leading to improved outcomes and a higher quality of life for individuals affected by hyperacusis.
References
Baguley DM. Hyperacusis. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 2003 Dec:96(12):582-5 [PubMed PMID: 14645606]
Tyler RS, Pienkowski M, Roncancio ER, Jun HJ, Brozoski T, Dauman N, Dauman N, Andersson G, Keiner AJ, Cacace AT, Martin N, Moore BC. A review of hyperacusis and future directions: part I. Definitions and manifestations. American journal of audiology. 2014 Dec:23(4):402-19 [PubMed PMID: 25104073]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceAazh H, Moore BC, Lammaing K, Cropley M. Tinnitus and hyperacusis therapy in a UK National Health Service audiology department: Patients' evaluations of the effectiveness of treatments. International journal of audiology. 2016 Sep:55(9):514-22. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2016.1178400. Epub 2016 May 19 [PubMed PMID: 27195947]
Paulin J, Andersson L, Nordin S. Characteristics of hyperacusis in the general population. Noise & health. 2016 Jul-Aug:18(83):178-84. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.189244. Epub [PubMed PMID: 27569405]
Anari M, Axelsson A, Eliasson A, Magnusson L. Hypersensitivity to sound--questionnaire data, audiometry and classification. Scandinavian audiology. 1999:28(4):219-30 [PubMed PMID: 10572967]
Baguley DM, Hoare DJ. Hyperacusis: major research questions. HNO. 2018 May:66(5):358-363. doi: 10.1007/s00106-017-0464-3. Epub [PubMed PMID: 29392341]
Di Stadio A, Dipietro L, Ricci G, Della Volpe A, Minni A, Greco A, de Vincentiis M, Ralli M. Hearing Loss, Tinnitus, Hyperacusis, and Diplacusis in Professional Musicians: A Systematic Review. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2018 Sep 26:15(10):. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102120. Epub 2018 Sep 26 [PubMed PMID: 30261653]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceHalevi-Katz DN, Yaakobi E, Putter-Katz H. Exposure to music and noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) among professional pop/rock/jazz musicians. Noise & health. 2015 May-Jun:17(76):158-64. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.155848. Epub [PubMed PMID: 25913555]
Shi L, Zhao R, Li X, Sun W, Liu X. A Review of the Neurobiological Mechanisms that Distinguish Between Loudness Recruitment and Hyperacusis. Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research. 2022 Apr 9:28():e936373. doi: 10.12659/MSM.936373. Epub 2022 Apr 9 [PubMed PMID: 35396343]
Jüris L, Andersson G, Larsen HC, Ekselius L. Psychiatric comorbidity and personality traits in patients with hyperacusis. International journal of audiology. 2013 Apr:52(4):230-5. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2012.743043. Epub 2012 Dec 17 [PubMed PMID: 23244506]
Nascimento JAD, Mielle LP, Silva LAF, Samelli AG, Matas CG. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of a questionnaire for assessing hyperacusis in Williams syndrome. Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria. 2025 Sep:83(9):1-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0045-1811624. Epub 2025 Sep 8 [PubMed PMID: 40921408]
Dwyer P, Williams ZJ, Lawson W, Rivera SM. A Trans-Diagnostic Investigation of Attention and Diverse Phenotypes of "Auditory Hyperreactivity" in Autism, ADHD, and the General Population. Journal of attention disorders. 2026 Jan:30(1):57-81. doi: 10.1177/10870547251361226. Epub 2025 Sep 18 [PubMed PMID: 40965092]
Rosing SN, Schmidt JH, Wedderkopp N, Baguley DM. Prevalence of tinnitus and hyperacusis in children and adolescents: a systematic review. BMJ open. 2016 Jun 3:6(6):e010596. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010596. Epub 2016 Jun 3 [PubMed PMID: 27259524]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceBigras C, Duda V, Hébert S. Loudness discomfort levels at extended high frequencies in young adults: A potential marker of hyperacusis. Hearing research. 2025 Nov:467():109425. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2025.109425. Epub 2025 Sep 13 [PubMed PMID: 40967116]
Andersson G, Lindvall N, Hursti T, Carlbring P. Hypersensitivity to sound (hyperacusis): a prevalence study conducted via the Internet and post. International journal of audiology. 2002 Dec:41(8):545-54 [PubMed PMID: 12477175]
McCormack A, Edmondson-Jones M, Somerset S, Hall D. A systematic review of the reporting of tinnitus prevalence and severity. Hearing research. 2016 Jul:337():70-9. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.05.009. Epub 2016 May 28 [PubMed PMID: 27246985]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceSchmuzigert N, Fostiropoulos K, Probst R. Long-term assessment of auditory changes resulting from a single noise exposure associated with non-occupational activities. International journal of audiology. 2006 Jan:45(1):46-54 [PubMed PMID: 16562564]
Marriage J, Barnes NM. Is central hyperacusis a symptom of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) dysfunction? The Journal of laryngology and otology. 1995 Oct:109(10):915-21 [PubMed PMID: 7499940]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceThompson GC, Thompson AM, Garrett KM, Britton BH. Serotonin and serotonin receptors in the central auditory system. Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 1994 Jan:110(1):93-102 [PubMed PMID: 8290307]
Hurley LM, Thompson AM, Pollak GD. Serotonin in the inferior colliculus. Hearing research. 2002 Jun:168(1-2):1-11 [PubMed PMID: 12117504]
Phillips DP, Carr MM. Disturbances of loudness perception. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 1998 Oct:9(5):371-9; quiz 399 [PubMed PMID: 9806411]
Salvi R, Radziwon K, Manohar S, Auerbach B, Ding D, Liu X, Lau C, Chen YC, Chen GD. Review: Neural Mechanisms of Tinnitus and Hyperacusis in Acute Drug-Induced Ototoxicity. American journal of audiology. 2021 Oct 11:30(3S):901-915. doi: 10.1044/2020_AJA-20-00023. Epub 2021 Jan 19 [PubMed PMID: 33465315]
Bramhall NF, Konrad-Martin D, McMillan GP. Tinnitus and Auditory Perception After a History of Noise Exposure: Relationship to Auditory Brainstem Response Measures. Ear and hearing. 2018 Sep/Oct:39(5):881-894. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000544. Epub [PubMed PMID: 29337762]
Hasson D, Theorell T, Bergquist J, Canlon B. Acute stress induces hyperacusis in women with high levels of emotional exhaustion. PloS one. 2013:8(1):e52945. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052945. Epub 2013 Jan 2 [PubMed PMID: 23301005]
Hébert S, Lupien SJ. Salivary cortisol levels, subjective stress, and tinnitus intensity in tinnitus sufferers during noise exposure in the laboratory. International journal of hygiene and environmental health. 2009 Jan:212(1):37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2007.11.005. Epub 2008 Feb 20 [PubMed PMID: 18243788]
Kappel V, Moreno AC, Buss CH. Plasticity of the auditory system: theoretical considerations. Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology. 2011 Sep-Oct:77(5):670-4 [PubMed PMID: 22030979]
Szczepaniak WS, Møller AR. Evidence of decreased GABAergic influence on temporal integration in the inferior colliculus following acute noise exposure: a study of evoked potentials in the rat. Neuroscience letters. 1995 Aug 18:196(1-2):77-80 [PubMed PMID: 7501262]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceSzczepaniak WS, Møller AR. Effects of L-baclofen and D-baclofen on the auditory system: a study of click-evoked potentials from the inferior colliculus in the rat. The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology. 1995 May:104(5):399-404 [PubMed PMID: 7747912]
Aazh H, Knipper M, Danesh AA, Cavanna AE, Andersson L, Paulin J, Schecklmann M, Heinonen-Guzejev M, Moore BCJ. Insights from the third international conference on hyperacusis: causes, evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment. Noise & health. 2018 Jul-Aug:20(95):162-170. doi: 10.4103/nah.NAH_2_18. Epub [PubMed PMID: 30136676]
Hickox AE, Liberman MC. Is noise-induced cochlear neuropathy key to the generation of hyperacusis or tinnitus? Journal of neurophysiology. 2014 Feb:111(3):552-64. doi: 10.1152/jn.00184.2013. Epub 2013 Nov 6 [PubMed PMID: 24198321]
Sheldrake J, Diehl PU, Schaette R. Audiometric characteristics of hyperacusis patients. Frontiers in neurology. 2015:6():105. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2015.00105. Epub 2015 May 15 [PubMed PMID: 26029161]
Diehl PU, Schaette R. Abnormal Auditory Gain in Hyperacusis: Investigation with a Computational Model. Frontiers in neurology. 2015:6():157. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2015.00157. Epub 2015 Jul 15 [PubMed PMID: 26236277]
Katzenell U, Segal S. Hyperacusis: review and clinical guidelines. Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology. 2001 May:22(3):321-6; discussion 326-7 [PubMed PMID: 11347634]
Auerbach BD, Rodrigues PV, Salvi RJ. Central gain control in tinnitus and hyperacusis. Frontiers in neurology. 2014:5():206. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2014.00206. Epub 2014 Oct 24 [PubMed PMID: 25386157]
Auerbach BD, Radziwon K, Salvi R. Testing the Central Gain Model: Loudness Growth Correlates with Central Auditory Gain Enhancement in a Rodent Model of Hyperacusis. Neuroscience. 2019 May 21:407():93-107. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.09.036. Epub 2018 Oct 5 [PubMed PMID: 30292765]
Zeng FG. An active loudness model suggesting tinnitus as increased central noise and hyperacusis as increased nonlinear gain. Hearing research. 2013 Jan:295():172-9. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.05.009. Epub 2012 May 26 [PubMed PMID: 22641191]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceZhao Y, Kouvaros S, Schneider NA, Krall RF, Lam S, Arnold MP, Williamson RS, Tzounopoulos T. Cell type-specific plasticity in synaptic, intrinsic, and sound response properties of deep-layer cortical neurons after noise trauma. Science advances. 2025 Sep 19:11(38):eadx9737. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adx9737. Epub 2025 Sep 19 [PubMed PMID: 40971419]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceSilverstein H, Smith J, Kellermeyer B. Stapes hypermobility as a possible cause of hyperacusis. American journal of otolaryngology. 2019 Mar-Apr:40(2):247-252. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2018.10.018. Epub 2018 Oct 31 [PubMed PMID: 30502003]
Edvall NK, Gunan E, Genitsaridi E, Lazar A, Mehraei G, Billing M, Tullberg M, Bulla J, Whitton J, Canlon B, Hall DA, Cederroth CR. Impact of Temporomandibular Joint Complaints on Tinnitus-Related Distress. Frontiers in neuroscience. 2019:13():879. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00879. Epub 2019 Aug 22 [PubMed PMID: 31548840]
Henry JA, Theodoroff SM, Edmonds C, Martinez I, Myers PJ, Zaugg TL, Goodworth MC. Sound Tolerance Conditions (Hyperacusis, Misophonia, Noise Sensitivity, and Phonophobia): Definitions and Clinical Management. American journal of audiology. 2022 Sep:31(3):513-527. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJA-22-00035. Epub 2022 Jul 5 [PubMed PMID: 35858241]
Lee HY, Kim SJ, Choi JY. Somatic Modulation in Tinnitus: Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes. The journal of international advanced otology. 2020 Aug:16(2):213-217. doi: 10.5152/iao.2020.8067. Epub [PubMed PMID: 32784160]
Pienkowski M, Tyler RS, Roncancio ER, Jun HJ, Brozoski T, Dauman N, Coelho CB, Andersson G, Keiner AJ, Cacace AT, Martin N, Moore BC. A review of hyperacusis and future directions: part II. Measurement, mechanisms, and treatment. American journal of audiology. 2014 Dec:23(4):420-36. doi: 10.1044/2014_AJA-13-0037. Epub [PubMed PMID: 25478787]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceHerráiz C, de los Santos G, Diges I, Díez R, Aparicio JM. [Assessment of hyperacusis: the self-rating questionnaire on hypersensitivity to sound]. Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola. 2006 Aug-Sep:57(7):303-6 [PubMed PMID: 17036991]
Raj-Koziak D, Gos E, Kutyba JJ, Skarzynski PH, Skarzynski H. Hyperacusis Assessment Questionnaire-A New Tool Assessing Hyperacusis in Subjects with Tinnitus. Journal of clinical medicine. 2023 Oct 19:12(20):. doi: 10.3390/jcm12206622. Epub 2023 Oct 19 [PubMed PMID: 37892760]
Aazh H, Moore BCJ. Factors related to uncomfortable loudness levels for patients seen in a tinnitus and hyperacusis clinic. International journal of audiology. 2017 Oct:56(10):793-800. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1335888. Epub 2017 Jun 16 [PubMed PMID: 28622055]
Fackrell K, Potgieter I, Shekhawat GS, Baguley DM, Sereda M, Hoare DJ. Clinical Interventions for Hyperacusis in Adults: A Scoping Review to Assess the Current Position and Determine Priorities for Research. BioMed research international. 2017:2017():2723715. doi: 10.1155/2017/2723715. Epub 2017 Oct 9 [PubMed PMID: 29312994]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceJüris L, Andersson G, Larsen HC, Ekselius L. Cognitive behaviour therapy for hyperacusis: a randomized controlled trial. Behaviour research and therapy. 2014 Mar:54():30-7. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2014.01.001. Epub 2014 Jan 24 [PubMed PMID: 24508581]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceSheppard A, Stocking C, Ralli M, Salvi R. A review of auditory gain, low-level noise and sound therapy for tinnitus and hyperacusis. International journal of audiology. 2020 Jan:59(1):5-15. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2019.1660812. Epub 2019 Sep 9 [PubMed PMID: 31498009]
Noreña AJ, Chery-Croze S. Enriched acoustic environment rescales auditory sensitivity. Neuroreport. 2007 Aug 6:18(12):1251-5 [PubMed PMID: 17632277]
Park JM, Kim WJ, Ha JB, Han JJ, Park SY, Park SN. Effect of sound generator on tinnitus and hyperacusis. Acta oto-laryngologica. 2018 Feb:138(2):135-139. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2017.1386801. Epub 2017 Oct 18 [PubMed PMID: 29043888]
Silverstein H, Kellermeyer B, Martinez U. Minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of hyperacusis: New technique and long term results. American journal of otolaryngology. 2020 Jan-Feb:41(1):102319. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2019.102319. Epub 2019 Oct 20 [PubMed PMID: 31727335]
Chilvers G, McKay-Davies I. Recent advances in superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome. The Journal of laryngology and otology. 2015 Mar:129(3):217-25. doi: 10.1017/S0022215115000183. Epub 2015 Feb 6 [PubMed PMID: 25655361]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceMinor LB. Superior canal dehiscence syndrome. The American journal of otology. 2000 Jan:21(1):9-19 [PubMed PMID: 10651428]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceFife TD, Satya-Murti S, Burkard RF, Carey JP. Vestibular evoked myogenic potential testing: Payment policy review for clinicians and payers. Neurology. Clinical practice. 2018 Apr:8(2):129-134. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000430. Epub [PubMed PMID: 29708189]
Minor LB. Clinical manifestations of superior semicircular canal dehiscence. The Laryngoscope. 2005 Oct:115(10):1717-27 [PubMed PMID: 16222184]
Aazh H, Moore BCJ. Thoughts about Suicide and Self-Harm in Patients with Tinnitus and Hyperacusis. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 2018 Mar:29(3):255-261. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.16181. Epub [PubMed PMID: 29488875]
Yilmaz S, Taş M, Bulut E, Nurçin E. Assessment of Reduced Tolerance to Sound (Hyperacusis) in University Students. Noise & health. 2017 Mar-Apr:19(87):73-78. doi: 10.4103/nah.NAH_54_16. Epub [PubMed PMID: 29192616]
Nolan DR, Gupta R, Huber CG, Schneeberger AR. An Effective Treatment for Tinnitus and Hyperacusis Based on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in an Inpatient Setting: A 10-Year Retrospective Outcome Analysis. Frontiers in psychiatry. 2020:11():25. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00025. Epub 2020 Feb 7 [PubMed PMID: 32116842]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidencePerreau AE, Tyler RS, Mancini PC, Witt S, Elgandy MS. Establishing a Group Educational Session for Hyperacusis Patients. American journal of audiology. 2019 Jun 10:28(2):245-250. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJA-18-0148. Epub 2019 May 16 [PubMed PMID: 31095405]