Introduction
Skeletal scintigraphy, bone scintigraphy, or the most commonly used term, "bone scan," constitutes a versatile and valuable nuclear medicine modality. The examination is typically performed using the radiotracer technetium-99m (Tc-99m) complexed to a diphosphonate, either methylene diphosphonate (MDP) to form Tc-99m MDP or hydroxydiphosphonate (HDP) to form Tc-99m HDP. Tc-99m is cost-effective and exhibits favorable imaging characteristics, including high spatial resolution, an optimal photopeak at 140 keV for γ-camera detection, and a relatively short physical half-life of 6 hours, which allows adequate image acquisition while minimizing radiation exposure.
Tc-99m phosphonates were first introduced into clinical practice in 1971 by Subramanian et al, with several subsequent formulations developed until the establishment of Tc-99m MDP in 1975, which remains the predominant radiotracer in skeletal scintigraphy.[1] Single-photon emission computed tomography combined with computed tomography (SPECT/CT) may be employed to enhance anatomic localization.[2] The precise mechanism by which Tc 99m MDP or Tc 99m HDP localizes to bone involves the binding of bisphosphonate analogs to crystalline hydroxyapatite in the extracellular mineral phase of bone via chemisorption.[3] Tc 99m phosphonates accumulate in bone in proportion to osteoblastic activity and, to a lesser extent, blood flow, which governs tracer delivery.
Consequently, any process that increases osteoblastic activity is associated with elevated radiotracer uptake, rendering the study highly sensitive but relatively nonspecific. The specificity of skeletal scintigraphy depends on integration of clinical history, correlation with complementary imaging modalities, and meticulous assessment of radiotracer uptake patterns, including mono-ostotic versus polyostotic, axial versus appendicular, periarticular versus metaphyseal or diaphyseal, and focal versus fusiform or linear distribution.
Fluorine-18 sodium fluoride (F18-NaF) positron emission tomography (PET) has recently experienced renewed use for metabolic bone imaging, driven by temporary shortages of Tc-99m and the widespread adoption of PET/computed tomography (PET/CT) technology. F18-NaF, a calcium analog, was first introduced in 1963, and its 511 keV photons were detectable with general-purpose rectilinear scanners or early positron detectors.[4] The short physical half-life of fluorine-18 (110 minutes) and dependence on cyclotron production limited widespread availability.
The subsequent introduction of Tc-99m generators, phosphate radiotracers, and γ cameras contributed to F18-NaF’s relative obscurity for approximately 4 decades. Modern F18-NaF PET/CT offers several advantages over Tc-99 m phosphonate bone scans, including superior spatial resolution, an enhanced target-to-background ratio, and increased sensitivity. Limitations include higher cost, slightly elevated radiation exposure, and a potentially higher false-positive rate resulting from increased uptake at sites of degenerative changes.[5]
Procedures
Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Search engine and full access to all medical articles
10 free questions in your specialty
Free CME/CE Activities
Free daily question in your email
Save favorite articles to your dashboard
Emails offering discounts
Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care
Procedures
Skeletal scintigraphy begins with intravenous administration of Tc-99m MDP or Tc-99m HDP, followed by imaging at multiple time points, referred to as "phases." The adult dose of Tc-99m ranges from 10 to 30 millicuries (mCi) or 370 to 1110 megabecquerels (MBq). In children younger than 5 years, the dose is 0.2 to 0.3 mCi/kg or 7 to 11 MBq/kg. Protocols may consist of 1 to 4 phases: flow, blood pool, delayed, and an optional fourth phase. The most frequently used protocols are single-phase studies with a delayed phase or 3-phase studies comprising flow, blood pool, and delayed phases.[6]
The flow phase is a radionuclide angiogram used to assess increased and, less commonly, decreased, arterial flow to the area of concern. Images are acquired every 2 to 5 seconds over 60 to 90 seconds, immediately following injection. The blood pool phase begins immediately after the flow phase and continues for up to 10 minutes postinjection. This phase evaluates the distribution of radiotracer between the blood and the interstitium, allowing assessment of hyperemia, which appears as increased soft-tissue activity due to tracer extravasation. The delayed phase consists of single planar images of the region of interest acquired 2 to 6 hours after injection, reflecting the rate of bone turnover.[7]
A fourth phase, obtained 24 hours after radiotracer administration, is infrequently performed. This phase may provide additional diagnostic information in patients with impaired renal function or peripheral vascular disease, particularly when osteomyelitis is suspected.[8] Three-phase bone scans are most commonly employed to evaluate osteomyelitis, joint prosthesis infection versus loosening, and complex regional pain syndrome. Other indications for bone scintigraphy are typically imaged using a single delayed-phase protocol. This activity focuses primarily on the single-phase bone scan. For detailed information regarding 3-phase studies, refer to the dedicated StatPearls article about triple-phase bone scans.[9]
Delayed-phase images are generally obtained as anterior and posterior whole-body projections, the area of interest, or both, using spot imaging when appropriate. Whole-body imaging is advantageous for nonfocal complaints, such as evaluation of suspected bony metastases, diffuse arthralgia, or elevated alkaline phosphatase of indeterminate origin. Spot imaging is preferred for focal concerns, including exclusion of tibial stress fracture, investigation of unexplained rib pain, or assessment of an indeterminate sclerotic femoral lesion observed on radiographs.
Spot images are smaller field-of-view acquisitions that provide improved spatial resolution and may be obtained in multiple projections, including anterior-posterior, lateral, and anterior-posterior oblique, to enhance anatomic localization of abnormal radiotracer uptake. When anatomic localization remains insufficient on spot images or involves a region of complex anatomy, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) may be performed with or without conventional CT. This technique enables fusion of Tc-99m MDP SPECT images with conventional CT images, thereby allowing precise anatomic localization.[10]
Indications
Skeletal scintigraphy has a broad spectrum of indications, encompassing any process that alters osseous turnover. Certain newer imaging modalities are increasingly replacing traditional bone scans in specific clinical contexts. For instance, routine bone scans are generally not recommended in patients with prostate cancer unless the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level reaches at least 20 ng/mL.[11][12][13] PET/CT using prostate-specific membrane antigen tracers—68Ga-PSMA-11, 18F-DCFPyL, and 18F-PSMA-1007—has largely supplanted bone scans in this population due to superior sensitivity and specificity.[14][15] PSMA-PET/CT may detect skeletal involvement in patients with PSA levels as low as 0.2 to 0.5 ng/mL, although reliability is highest in individuals with PSA levels exceeding 1 ng/mL.[16][17][18]
The most common indications for bone scans include the detection or follow-up of osseous metastases, the identification of radiographically occult injuries, the evaluation for osteomyelitis, the assessment of osseous stress injuries, and the determination of prosthetic hardware infection or loosening. Less frequently, bone scans are utilized for evaluation of primary bone lesions, assessment of avascular necrosis or bone infarcts, determination of bone graft viability, diagnosis of complex regional pain syndrome, screening for child abuse, mapping the distribution of osteoblastic activity in preparation for radionuclide therapy for bone metastases, evaluation of arthritides, investigation of indeterminate radiographic, laboratory, or clinical findings suggestive of skeletal involvement, and assessment of metabolic bone disease.[19][20][21]
Normal and Critical Findings
An understanding of the normal anatomic distribution of Tc-99m MDP is essential for accurate interpretation of skeletal scintigraphy. Symmetrical radiotracer uptake is expected throughout the osseous structures of a healthy adult. In children, increased uptake is observed in the physes of the long bones, which represent normal growth centers.
Benign areas of increased radiotracer accumulation commonly include the acromioclavicular joints, sternoclavicular joints, sternomanubrial junction, sacroiliac joints, pubic symphysis, and articular surfaces of the shoulders, hips, knees, ankles, and feet. This pattern likely reflects constant bony remodeling at weight-bearing joint surfaces and the predisposition of these areas to degenerative changes. In adult patients, focal increased uptake is frequently observed in the maxillary and mandibular regions due to underlying dental disease, which can induce reactive osteogenesis. Uptake may also be present in the nasopharyngeal region of the facial bones in individuals with chronic sinus disease.
Skeletal scintigraphy is generally not indicated for the evaluation of bone lesions known to yield inconsistent results, including chordomas, Ewing sarcomas, multiple myeloma, and plasmacytomas. The modality is also not recommended for the characterization of bony lesions optimally visualized with standard radiological imaging, such as asymptomatic enchondromas of the long bones, bone islands, ganglion cysts, nonossifying fibromas, osteitis condensans ilii, Paget disease, and uncomplicated hemangiomas. Degenerative joint diseases are best assessed using standard radiological imaging in conjunction with clinical history and focused physical examination.
Normal extraosseous activity is observed faintly in the kidneys and intensely in the bladder, reflecting renal excretion of Tc99m MDP (or Tc-99m HDP). Minimal soft tissue activity may also be physiologic. Absence of renal and bladder activity should raise suspicion for a “superscan.” A superscan represents diffusely increased osseous uptake due to metastatic disease, most commonly from breast or prostate cancer, or metabolic bone disease, resulting in minimal or absent renal excretion of the radiotracer.[22][23] Radiotracer localization to the myocardium may occur in cardiac amyloidosis. Recent studies have explored the potential utility of bone scans for the evaluation of cardiac amyloidosis.[24]
Critical Findings
Bone scans play a critical role in the detection of osseous metastatic disease, which most commonly involves the axial skeleton and proximal appendicular skeleton, corresponding to regions of red marrow distribution. Evaluation of primary osseous malignancies and extraskeletal metastases, particularly pulmonary metastases, may also be supported by bone scintigraphy, although definitive diagnosis of primary disease typically relies on other imaging modalities. Bone scintigraphy is sensitive for detecting stress fractures, most commonly affecting the lower extremities, including the tibia, metatarsals, and femoral neck. Involvement of the femoral neck is of particular clinical concern due to the risk of progression to a displaced fracture. The modality is also widely used to identify osteomyelitis and to evaluate suspected infection of prosthetic or orthopedic hardware.
In the pediatric population, bone scintigraphy may aid in the detection of occult fractures during evaluation for child abuse when used as an adjunct to a radiographic skeletal survey, particularly in children older than 1 year. Common sites of involvement include the ribs and extremities. However, bone scintigraphy demonstrates low sensitivity for pediatric skull fractures and classic metaphyseal corner fractures.[25] Bone scintigraphy may also aid in detecting nonaccidental trauma when radiographic findings are equivocal.[26]
Bone scans may demonstrate characteristic findings in avascular necrosis, particularly in patients with risk factors such as sickle cell disease or chronic corticosteroid use. Prolonged bisphosphonate therapy may result in atypical femoral fractures, which may also be detected on bone scintigraphy. Incidental soft tissue radiotracer uptake represents a critical finding and may indicate occult malignancy, including breast cancer, malignant pleural effusion, soft tissue sarcoma, or metastatic disease involving the liver.[27] Visualization of the kidneys is expected on every bone scan. Absence of renal activity should prompt concern for a superscan pattern.
Interfering Factors
A major interfering factor in skeletal scintigraphy is impaired renal function. Accurate interpretation of a bone scan depends on renal clearance of the radiotracer from the soft tissues, so that image formation predominantly reflects γ emissions from Tc-99m MDP bound to bone hydroxyapatite. Renal dysfunction limits radiotracer excretion, resulting in persistent extraosseous soft tissue activity that degrades bone visualization and reduces the target-to-background ratio.[28]
The impact of renal insufficiency on skeletal scintigraphy may be partially mitigated by acquiring a 24-hour delayed image, commonly referred to as the fourth phase, which provides additional time for clearance of nonosseous activity. This approach is constrained by the 6-hour physical half-life of Tc-99m, leaving approximately 6.25% of the initial administered activity available for imaging at 24 hours. Similar limitations may arise in the setting of patient dehydration, which can further impair renal clearance of radiotracer from the soft tissues. Oral hydration during the interval between radiotracer administration and delayed-phase image acquisition, typically 2 to 6 hours, improves renal excretion and optimizes image quality.
Additional conditions that may interfere with skeletal scintigraphy include disorders of iron deposition, such as thalassemia major and hemochromatosis. These conditions are associated with increased technetium uptake in the liver and kidneys, which reduces radiotracer availability for skeletal localization. Excess iron directly interferes with the uptake of technetium-based compounds by bone, while concomitant soft tissue accumulation occurs as a result of iron overload. Collectively, these effects hinder the identification of true skeletal abnormalities, including fractures and neoplasms, on skeletal scintigraphy.[29]
Another potential source of interference is suboptimal labeling of Tc 99m with MDP or HDP. Inadequate labeling results in the presence of unbound Tc-99m pertechnetate, commonly referred to as "free technetium." Free technetium localizes physiologically to the salivary glands, thyroid gland, and stomach, which may confound the interpretation of images. This phenomenon applies broadly to Tc-99m–labeled radiotracers and is not unique to skeletal scintigraphy.
The "flare phenomenon" may also confound the interpretation of skeletal scintigraphy. This uptake pattern is characterized by apparent worsening of osseous metastatic disease during the 2 to 6 months following initiation of chemotherapy. New sites of radiotracer uptake may appear, and previously identified lesions may increase in size or intensity.[30] This appearance is thought to reflect increased osteoblastic activity and bone turnover associated with the healing of metastatic involvement, including sclerosis of previously occult lytic lesions. This pseudoprogression resolves on subsequent follow-up bone scans, thereby confirming a therapeutic response.
Complications
Skeletal scintigraphy requires intravenous radiotracer administration. Most complications associated with this examination arise from improper injection technique and primarily affect image quality rather than patient safety.[31] Extravasation of injected Tc-99m MDP into the surrounding soft tissues produces several characteristic effects. Reduced radiotracer delivery to the skeleton markedly degrades visualization of osteoblastic pathology.
Lymphatic uptake of extravasated radiotracer may occur, resulting in lymph node retention that complicates same-day reinjection and may obscure adjacent osseous abnormalities. Intense activity at the injection site further degrades skeletal image quality due to excess photon contribution originating from the site of extravasation. Inadvertent arterial injection may occur in rare cases, producing the so-called "glove phenomenon." This finding is characterized by pronounced asymmetric radiotracer uptake extending distally from the arterial injection site into the hand and fingers.[32]
Patient Safety and Education
Skeletal scintigraphy involves exposure to ionizing radiation from γ rays emitted by the radiotracer Tc-99m. The effective whole-body radiation dose in adults is approximately 0.0057 millisieverts (mSv) per MBq, corresponding to an estimated dose of 4 mSv for the administration of 20 mCi of Tc-99m MDP. In children younger than 5 years, the effective whole-body dose is higher, at approximately 0.025 mSv/MBq. For comparison, the average annual background radiation exposure in adults is approximately 3 mSv.
A small fraction of Tc-99m pertechnetate is excreted in breast milk. However, the estimated fetal radiation dose remains below 1 mSv (100 mrem).[33] Therefore, discontinuation of breastfeeding is not required. Despite this finding, some clinicians recommend temporary cessation of breastfeeding for 12 to 24 hours, reflecting patient concern and adherence to earlier guideline recommendations.[34]
Clinical Significance
Skeletal scintigraphy is a versatile imaging modality that provides a highly sensitive assessment of bone pathology, particularly for the detection of stress injuries and radiographically occult fractures. A negative bone scan at 72 hours effectively excludes fractures of the appendicular skeleton, with reported sensitivities of 95% to 100%. Healing fractures may continue to demonstrate increased uptake long after the initial trauma, with 60% to 80% of fractures returning to normal on bone scan within a year and 95% within 3 years.[35] Detection of osseous stress injury is clinically important because modifying patient activity can prevent progression to complete fracture.
Skeletal scintigraphy also demonstrates high sensitivity for evaluation of osteomyelitis, reaching up to 94%, which confers an excellent negative predictive value.[36] The examination exhibits similar specificity in normal bone. However, the presence of underlying intrinsic lesions, orthopedic hardware, fractures, or recent surgical intervention can reduce specificity to as low as 34%, necessitating additional imaging when positive findings are observed.[37] Complementary nuclear medicine options include F18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT and leukocyte scans with indium-111 or Tc-99m hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime radiolabeling.
The sensitivity of bone scans for metastatic disease varies by primary tumor type. Detailed sensitivity and specificity data for each malignancy are beyond the scope of this activity. However, bone scintigraphy demonstrates the greatest accuracy for osteoblastic metastases and the lowest accuracy for malignancies that predominantly produce osteolytic lesions. Common malignancies with high sensitivity for the detection of bone metastases include breast, prostate, and lung cancer. Malignancies for which bone scintigraphy exhibits low sensitivity include multiple myeloma, renal cell carcinoma, and thyroid carcinoma.
References
Subramanian G, McAfee JG. A new complex of 99mTc for skeletal imaging. Radiology. 1971 Apr:99(1):192-6 [PubMed PMID: 5548678]
Level 3 (low-level) evidencePalmedo H, Marx C, Ebert A, Kreft B, Ko Y, Türler A, Vorreuther R, Göhring U, Schild HH, Gerhardt T, Pöge U, Ezziddin S, Biersack HJ, Ahmadzadehfar H. Whole-body SPECT/CT for bone scintigraphy: diagnostic value and effect on patient management in oncological patients. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging. 2014 Jan:41(1):59-67. doi: 10.1007/s00259-013-2532-6. Epub 2013 Aug 24 [PubMed PMID: 23974666]
Subramanian G, McAfee JG, Blair RJ, Kallfelz FA, Thomas FD. Technetium-99m-methylene diphosphonate--a superior agent for skeletal imaging: comparison with other technetium complexes. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine. 1975 Aug:16(8):744-55 [PubMed PMID: 170385]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceBridges RL, Wiley CR, Christian JC, Strohm AP. An introduction to Na(18)F bone scintigraphy: basic principles, advanced imaging concepts, and case examples. Journal of nuclear medicine technology. 2007 Jun:35(2):64-76; quiz 78-9 [PubMed PMID: 17496010]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceGrant FD, Fahey FH, Packard AB, Davis RT, Alavi A, Treves ST. Skeletal PET with 18F-fluoride: applying new technology to an old tracer. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine. 2008 Jan:49(1):68-78 [PubMed PMID: 18077529]
Bartel TB, Kuruva M, Gnanasegaran G, Beheshti M, Cohen EJ, Weissman AF, Yarbrough TL. SNMMI Procedure Standard for Bone Scintigraphy 4.0. Journal of nuclear medicine technology. 2018 Dec:46(4):398-404 [PubMed PMID: 30518604]
Love C, Din AS, Tomas MB, Kalapparambath TP, Palestro CJ. Radionuclide bone imaging: an illustrative review. Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. 2003 Mar-Apr:23(2):341-58 [PubMed PMID: 12640151]
Alazraki N, Dries D, Datz F, Lawrence P, Greenberg E, Taylor A Jr. Value of a 24-hour image (four-phase bone scan) in assessing osteomyelitis in patients with peripheral vascular disease. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine. 1985 Jul:26(7):711-7 [PubMed PMID: 3159858]
Dinh T, McWhorter N. Triple Phase Bone Scan. StatPearls. 2026 Jan:(): [PubMed PMID: 30571011]
McArthur C, McLaughlin G, Meddings RN. Changing the referral criteria for bone scan in newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients. The British journal of radiology. 2012 Apr:85(1012):390-4. doi: 10.1259/bjr/79184355. Epub 2011 Feb 8 [PubMed PMID: 21304009]
Wollin DA, Makarov DV. Guideline of Guidelines: Imaging of Localized Prostate Cancer. BJU international. 2015 Oct:116(4):526-30. doi: 10.1111/bju.13104. Epub 2015 Jun 6 [PubMed PMID: 25715887]
Singh KB, London KI, Wong VCK, Mansberg R. Diagnostic accuracy of bone scan at different PSA levels in biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences. 2024 Mar:55(1):91-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2023.12.008. Epub 2024 Jan 11 [PubMed PMID: 38216344]
Özgür BC, Gültekin S, Ekici M, Yılmazer D, Alper M. A narrowing range of bone scan in newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients: A retrospective comparative study. Urology annals. 2015 Apr-Jun:7(2):193-8. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.150479. Epub [PubMed PMID: 25835063]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceLeslie SW, Soon-Sutton TL, Skelton WP. Prostate Cancer. StatPearls. 2026 Jan:(): [PubMed PMID: 29261872]
Mohseninia N, Zamani-Siahkali N, Harsini S, Divband G, Pirich C, Beheshti M. Bone Metastasis in Prostate Cancer: Bone Scan Versus PET Imaging. Seminars in nuclear medicine. 2024 Jan:54(1):97-118. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2023.07.004. Epub 2023 Aug 17 [PubMed PMID: 37596138]
Pianou NK, Stavrou PZ, Vlontzou E, Rondogianni P, Exarhos DN, Datseris IE. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using (18)F-PSMA PET/CT. Hellenic journal of nuclear medicine. 2019 Jan-Apr:22(1):6-9. doi: 10.1967/s002449910952. Epub 2019 Mar 7 [PubMed PMID: 30843003]
Zhao R, Li Y, Nie L, Qin K, Zhang H, Shi H. The meta-analysis of the effect of 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT diagnosis of prostatic cancer compared with bone scan. Medicine. 2021 Apr 16:100(15):e25417. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025417. Epub [PubMed PMID: 33847640]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceUslu-BeÅŸli L, SaÄŸer S, Akgün E, Asa S, Åžahin OE, DemirdaÄŸ Ç, Güner E, Khosroshahi BR, Karayel E, PehlivanoÄŸlu H, Aygün A, Uslu İ, Talat Z, SönmezoÄŸlu K. Comparison of Ga-68 PSMA positron emission tomography/computerized tomography with Tc-99m MDP bone scan in prostate cancer patients. Turkish journal of medical sciences. 2019 Feb 11:49(1):301-310. doi: 10.3906/sag-1807-4. Epub 2019 Feb 11 [PubMed PMID: 30761859]
van der Zant FM, Wondergem M, Knol RJJ. Bone Scintigraphy in 2 Cases of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome. Clinical nuclear medicine. 2024 Oct 1:49(10):991-992. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000005315. Epub 2024 May 26 [PubMed PMID: 39223732]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceVan den Wyngaert T, Strobel K, Kampen WU, Kuwert T, van der Bruggen W, Mohan HK, Gnanasegaran G, Delgado-Bolton R, Weber WA, Beheshti M, Langsteger W, Giammarile F, Mottaghy FM, Paycha F, EANM Bone & Joint Committee and the Oncology Committee. The EANM practice guidelines for bone scintigraphy. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging. 2016 Aug:43(9):1723-38. doi: 10.1007/s00259-016-3415-4. Epub 2016 Jun 4 [PubMed PMID: 27262701]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceGriepp DW, Sajan A, Sighary M. Diffuse Paget's Disease of the Skull with Intense Uptake of Technetium-99m-Labeled Diphosphonate Tracer in Bone Scintigraphy. World neurosurgery. 2021 Jul:151():89-90. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.04.101. Epub 2021 Apr 30 [PubMed PMID: 33940269]
Buckley O, O'Keeffe S, Geoghegan T, Lyburn ID, Munk PL, Worsley D, Torreggiani WC. 99mTc bone scintigraphy superscans: a review. Nuclear medicine communications. 2007 Jul:28(7):521-7 [PubMed PMID: 17538392]
Kovacsne A, Kozon I, Bentestuen M, Zacho HD. Frequency of superscan on bone scintigraphy: A systematic review. Clinical physiology and functional imaging. 2023 Sep:43(5):297-304. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12821. Epub 2023 Apr 25 [PubMed PMID: 37070619]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceMorfino P, Aimo A, Giorgetti A, Genovesi D, Merlo M, Limongelli G, Castiglione V, Vergaro G, Emdin M. The Role of Scintigraphy with Bone Radiotracers in Cardiac Amyloidosis. Heart failure clinics. 2024 Jul:20(3):307-316. doi: 10.1016/j.hfc.2024.03.003. Epub 2024 Apr 8 [PubMed PMID: 38844301]
Howard JL, Barron BJ, Smith GG. Bone scintigraphy in the evaluation of extraskeletal injuries from child abuse. Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. 1990 Jan:10(1):67-81 [PubMed PMID: 2296698]
Blangis F, Taylor M, Adamsbaum C, Devillers A, Gras-Le Guen C, Launay E, Bossuyt PM, Cohen JF, Chalumeau M. Add-on bone scintigraphy after negative radiological skeletal survey for the diagnosis of skeletal injury in children suspected of physical abuse: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of disease in childhood. 2021 Apr:106(4):361-366. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-319065. Epub 2020 Sep 30 [PubMed PMID: 32998873]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceConte M, De Feo MS, Frantellizzi V, Marampon F, Filippi L, Schillaci O, De Vincentis G. Extraosseous distribution of (99m)Tc-diphosphonates during bone scintigraphy: review of the literature with case series presentation. International journal of radiation biology. 2024:100(1):18-27. doi: 10.1080/09553002.2023.2242935. Epub 2023 Aug 10 [PubMed PMID: 37561127]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceZhao C, Long X, Zhou K, Zhou J, Zhao C, Cao L, Jia Z. Whole-Body Bone Scintigraphy Helps to Detect Kidney Diseases. AJR. American journal of roentgenology. 2021 Jan:216(1):172-185. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.22834. Epub 2020 Nov 19 [PubMed PMID: 32603222]
Choy D, Murray IP, Hoschl R. The effect of iron on the biodistribution of bone scanning agents in humans. Radiology. 1981 Jul:140(1):197-202 [PubMed PMID: 6264545]
Pollen JJ, Witztum KF, Ashburn WL. The flare phenomenon on radionuclide bone scan in metastatic prostate cancer. AJR. American journal of roentgenology. 1984 Apr:142(4):773-6 [PubMed PMID: 6230903]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceFernandes D, Santos M, Pinheiro M, Duarte H, Fontes F. Radiopharmaceutical extravasation in bone scintigraphy: a cross-sectional study. Nuclear medicine communications. 2023 Oct 1:44(10):870-875. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001738. Epub 2023 Jul 18 [PubMed PMID: 37464878]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceShih WJ, Wienrzbinski B, Ryo UY. Abnormally increased uptake in the palm and the thumb as the result of a bone imaging agent injection into the radial artery. Clinical nuclear medicine. 2000 Jul:25(7):539-40 [PubMed PMID: 10885697]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceStabin MG, Breitz HB. Breast milk excretion of radiopharmaceuticals: mechanisms, findings, and radiation dosimetry. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine. 2000 May:41(5):863-73 [PubMed PMID: 10809203]
Ahlgren L, Ivarsson S, Johansson L, Mattsson S, Nosslin B. Excretion of radionuclides in human breast milk after the administration of radiopharmaceuticals. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine. 1985 Sep:26(9):1085-90 [PubMed PMID: 4032049]
Matin P. The appearance of bone scans following fractures, including immediate and long-term studies. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine. 1979 Dec:20(12):1227-31 [PubMed PMID: 536788]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceChristian S, Kraas J, Conway WF. Musculoskeletal infections. Seminars in roentgenology. 2007 Apr:42(2):92-101 [PubMed PMID: 17394922]
El-Maghraby TA, Moustafa HM, Pauwels EK. Nuclear medicine methods for evaluation of skeletal infection among other diagnostic modalities. The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of.... 2006 Sep:50(3):167-92 [PubMed PMID: 16868532]