Back To Search Results

Biliary Atresia

Editor: Tahani Ahmad Updated: 2/2/2026 10:12:28 PM

Introduction

Biliary atresia is a progressive, obstructive cholangiopathy of infancy affecting the intrahepatic, extrahepatic, or entire biliary tree. Typically presenting in the neonatal period with persistent jaundice, acholic stools, dark urine, and hepatomegaly, the disorder reflects profound cholestasis and ongoing hepatic injury. Without intervention, this condition advances inexorably to fibrosis, cirrhosis, and liver failure, with historical survival rates below 10% by age 3.

First described in 1817 by Dr John Burns as an incurable condition, biliary atresia saw little therapeutic progress until the mid-twentieth century. A pivotal advancement occurred in the 1950s with Dr Morio Kasai’s introduction of the portoenterostomy procedure, which excises the fibrotic biliary remnant and restores bile drainage via a Roux-en-Y intestinal loop.[1][2][3] The Kasai portoenterostomy remains the definitive initial surgical intervention for all eligible infants.

Nevertheless, many patients experience progressive liver disease despite surgery, making pediatric liver transplantation an integral component of long-term management for those with failed biliary drainage or advanced cirrhosis. Consequently, early diagnosis and timely, sequential application of portoenterostomy and transplantation are critical determinants of survival, underscoring the need for prompt recognition and a coordinated multidisciplinary approach.

Etiology

Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Get the answers you need instantly with the StatPearls Clinical Decision Support tool. StatPearls spent the last decade developing the largest and most updated Point-of Care resource ever developed. Earn CME/CE by searching and reading articles.
  • Dropdown arrow Search engine and full access to all medical articles
  • Dropdown arrow 10 free questions in your specialty
  • Dropdown arrow Free CME/CE Activities
  • Dropdown arrow Free daily question in your email
  • Dropdown arrow Save favorite articles to your dashboard
  • Dropdown arrow Emails offering discounts

Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care

Etiology

Biliary atresia is a complex, progressive cholangiopathy of infancy with an incompletely defined etiology. Current evidence supports the concept that this condition represents a final common phenotype resulting from multiple, potentially convergent pathogenic pathways, including genetic susceptibility, disordered embryological development, immune-mediated bile duct injury, and acquired inflammatory or infectious insults.[4][5] Many experts propose a "2-hit" model, wherein a postnatal inflammatory or infectious insult follows a prenatal developmental vulnerability.

Genetic and Embryologic Factors

Syndromic associations occur in 3% to 20% of cases, and the geographic variability in incidence suggests a genetic contribution, although familial aggregation is rare. Embryologically, the nonsyndromic form may result from defective ductal plate remodeling at the hepatic hilum.[6] Molecular studies indicate persistence of immature cholangiocyte phenotypes. Recent evidence points to biliary atresia as a potential ciliopathy, where defects in cholangiocyte ciliary structure impair ductal development and bile flow.[7]

Acquired Inflammatory and Infectious Triggers

Postnatal insults are suggested by epidemiologic observations such as seasonal clustering of cases and the evolution from initially pigmented to acholic stools in affected infants. Viral infections, including rotavirus and reovirus type 3, have been implicated in animal models, while human studies remain inconclusive. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection defines a distinct clinical subset marked by higher bilirubin and transaminase levels, pronounced histologic inflammation, and generally poorer outcomes.[8] Results from recent retrospective studies in 2025 suggest that CMV status may modulate disease severity and biochemical profile, rather than directly influencing postoperative cholangitis.[9]

Immune-Mediated Mechanisms

Dysregulated immune responses are central to the progression of bile duct injury. Histopathology demonstrates increased expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1, recruitment of CD4+, CD8+, natural killer lymphocytes, and persistent activation of innate and adaptive immune pathways.[10] Recent immunophenotyping studies in children with portal hypertension secondary to biliary atresia confirm that chronic immune activation contributes to fibrosis and portal hypertensive complications.

Classification

Biliary atresia is a heterogeneous condition, classified both clinically and morphologically.[11]

Clinical/Phenotypic Classification

  • Biliary atresia splenic malformation (BASM) syndrome (~10%)
    • This is characterized by laterality defects (polysplenia, situs inversus), vascular anomalies (preduodenal portal vein, interrupted inferior vena cava), cardiac malformations, and intestinal malrotation, reflecting very early embryologic disruption.[12]
  • Cardiac-associated biliary atresia 
    • A distinct prognostic subgroup defined by the presence of significant structural cardiac anomalies (eg, septal defects, tetralogy of Fallot). These cases may or may not include other BASM features and are associated with poorer outcomes.[13]
  • Other syndromic associations
    • There are rare links to cat-eye syndrome and Kabuki syndrome.
  • Cystic biliary atresia (~10%)
    • This type exhibits cystic dilatation at the porta hepatis; it is typically diagnosed early and is associated with favorable outcomes post-Kasai.[14]
  • CMV immunoglobulin M (IgM)-positive biliary atresia (~10%)
    • A distinct inflammatory subset with higher bilirubin and aspartate aminotransferase levels, prominent inflammatory infiltrates on histology, and poorer prognosis.[15]
  • Isolated biliary atresia (~70%)
    • The most common form, lacking congenital anomalies, has a multifactorial etiology, with contributions from developmental susceptibility and postnatal inflammatory injury.

Morphological Classification (Japanese Association of Pediatric Surgeons)

  • Type I: Obliteration of the common bile duct
  • Type IIa: Obliteration of the common hepatic duct
  • Type IIb: Obliteration of the common bile duct, hepatic duct, and cystic duct with a patent gallbladder
  • Type III: Obliteration at the porta hepatis with no anastomosable ducts; the most common and surgically challenging (>90% of cases)

Epidemiology

Biliary atresia exhibits marked geographic and ethnic variation in incidence, underscoring its complex, multifactorial etiology. Globally, it is a rare disorder, with the highest reported rates observed in East Asia. In Taiwan and Japan, incidence estimates range from approximately 1 in 5000 to 1 in 10,000 live births.[16][17] Conversely, populations in Western nations, such as England and Wales, demonstrate lower incidence rates, typically between 1 in 15,000 and 1 in 20,000 live births.[18] These disparities likely reflect underlying genetic susceptibility, regional environmental factors, and potential differences in diagnostic ascertainment.

Further supporting an environmental component, results from several studies have identified seasonal clustering of cases, with peaks often reported in winter months.[19] Although this pattern is not universal, it lends credence to the hypothesis that perinatal infectious or other environmental triggers may contribute to disease pathogenesis in genetically susceptible infants. A consistent, slight female predominance has been noted across diverse cohorts, though the pathophysiological basis for this gender disparity remains unexplained.

Epidemiologic patterns also extend to the distribution of disease subtypes. BASM syndrome accounts for roughly 10% of cases in European series but is reported less frequently in Asian populations. In contrast, CMV IgM-positive biliary atresia is more commonly reported in East Asian cohorts, particularly in China, and is associated with more pronounced biochemical inflammation and poorer clinical outcomes. Collectively, these epidemiological observations reinforce that biliary atresia is a heterogeneous condition influenced by an interplay of genetic, environmental, and regional factors.

Histopathology

Histological examination of liver tissue in biliary atresia shows a spectrum of changes reflecting the stage and severity of disease at presentation. Common findings include portal tract expansion with variable degrees of fibrosis, marked bile duct proliferation, bile duct plugging, canalicular and hepatocellular cholestasis, and mixed inflammatory cell infiltration. As the disease progresses, these changes may evolve into bridging fibrosis and established biliary cirrhosis.

Among these features, bile duct proliferation is considered one of the most characteristic histopathologic findings in biliary atresia and is a highly sensitive marker for the disease in the appropriate clinical context.[20] When combined with portal fibrosis and cholestasis, this feature helps distinguish biliary atresia from other causes of neonatal cholestasis. However, histologic findings must be interpreted in the context of clinical, laboratory, and imaging data, as overlap with other cholestatic disorders can occur, particularly in early disease.

History and Physical

Infants with biliary atresia typically present in the neonatal period with persistent jaundice beyond the second week of life, acholic or pale stools, dark urine, and hepatomegaly.[21] Jaundice persisting for more than 14 days should not be considered physiological and warrants prompt evaluation for cholestatic liver disease. Early clinical presentation may be subtle, and several studies emphasize that a proportion of infants initially pass pigmented stools that progressively become acholic as bile flow deteriorates, contributing to delayed diagnosis.

Recent cohort data reinforce that delayed recognition of stool color change remains a major factor influencing outcomes after Kasai portoenterostomy. Nugraheni et al demonstrated that earlier age at diagnosis and intervention was significantly associated with improved 5-year native liver survival, highlighting the importance of early clinical suspicion during routine neonatal follow-up. This supports the clinical emphasis on early stool surveillance and timely referral.[22]

As the disease progresses, signs of chronic liver injury and portal hypertension become evident. These include firm hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, ascites, failure to thrive, and, in advanced cases, features of hepatic synthetic dysfunction. Di Dato et al described distinct immunological alterations in children with portal hypertension, including systemic immune activation and inflammatory profiles that correlate with disease severity. These findings provide a mechanistic basis for the progressive clinical deterioration observed on physical examination in advanced biliary atresia.[23]

Infectious and syndromic associations may also influence presentation. Study results from East Asia show a higher prevalence of CMV IgM positivity in biliary atresia, which has been associated with more aggressive inflammatory cholangitis and worse postoperative outcomes. Additionally, rare overlap with syndromic conditions such as cat-eye syndrome, CABA, and Alagille Syndrome has been reported, underscoring the need for careful evaluation of cardiac, vertebral, and facial features during physical examination when atypical findings are present.[24][25] Overall, careful assessment of jaundice duration, stool color evolution, growth parameters, hepatosplenomegaly, and early signs of portal hypertension remains central to diagnosis. Recent evidence strongly supports the conclusion that early recognition during history and physical examination directly affects long-term survival outcomes.

Evaluation

No single investigation can diagnose biliary atresia with high specificity. Diagnosis, therefore, relies on a structured, sequential approach that integrates clinical assessment, laboratory biomarkers, imaging, and histopathology. Timely progression through this pathway is essential, as diagnostic delay significantly reduces the success of Kasai portoenterostomy and long-term survival of the native liver.

Laboratory Studies

Laboratory evaluation reveals conjugated hyperbilirubinemia with elevation of both total and direct bilirubin. Serum aminotransferases are typically mildly to moderately elevated but nonspecific. Alkaline phosphatase is often elevated in infancy due to bone growth, which limits its diagnostic utility; liver-specific enzymes, such as 5′-nucleotidase, offer greater specificity. Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGTP), localized to the cholangiocyte canalicular membrane, is commonly elevated in obstructive cholestasis and helps differentiate biliary atresia from low-GGTP disorders such as progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis. However, its diagnostic performance remains modest, with sensitivity and specificity of approximately 50% to 60%, supporting its role as a supportive rather than definitive marker.[26][27]

A highly promising biomarker is serum matrix metalloproteinase-7 (MMP-7), which reflects cholangiocyte injury and ductal remodeling.[28] In multiple cohorts, MMP-7 has demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy compared to GGTP, strongly discriminating biliary atresia from other causes of neonatal cholestasis. While not yet universally available, MMP-7 is increasingly incorporated into contemporary diagnostic algorithms and multivariable prediction models.

Imaging Studies

Ultrasonography

Abdominal ultrasonography is the first-line imaging modality due to its wide availability and noninvasive nature. This modality assesses liver parenchyma, portal venous anatomy, and splenic size while excluding structural anomalies such as choledochal cysts. Typical findings include an absent or hypoplastic gallbladder and failure of postprandial gallbladder contraction.  

The triangular cord sign, an echogenic fibrotic remnant at the porta hepatis, has high specificity but variable sensitivity and notable interobserver variability.[29][30] Antenatal ultrasonography may detect gallbladder abnormalities in syndromic forms, facilitating early postnatal referral. The overall diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound alone is approximately 70% to 80%.

Hepatobiliary scintigraphy

Hepatobiliary scintigraphy using technetium-labeled iminodiacetic acid derivatives evaluates biliary excretion. Intestinal tracer excretion reliably excludes biliary atresia; however, absence of excretion is not diagnostic, as severe hepatocellular dysfunction (eg, in neonatal hepatitis) can yield similar findings, particularly with marked hyperbilirubinemia. False-positive and false-negative rates approach 10%.[31]

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography 

This test is not routinely performed in neonates due to technical constraints and limited expertise. In specialized centers, it can directly delineate biliary anatomy and may prevent unnecessary surgical exploration. Emerging techniques, including artificial intelligence-assisted image interpretation, may have an adjunctive role in equivocal cases.

MRI and MR cholangiopancreatography 

These imaging modalities offer detailed, noninvasive visualization of the biliary tree and hepatic parenchyma. Routine use is limited by cost, need for sedation, and reduced spatial resolution in neonates; thus, it is generally reserved for complex or atypical presentations.

Duodenal Intubation

Duodenal intubation with bile aspiration can exclude biliary atresia but is invasive, technically challenging, and unreliable. This technique has largely been abandoned in contemporary diagnostic pathways.

Histopathological Evaluation

Percutaneous liver biopsy remains 1 of the most accurate diagnostic tools. Characteristic features include bile duct proliferation, canalicular bile plugging, portal tract edema and fibrosis, portal inflammatory infiltrates, and extramedullary hematopoiesis. Bile duct proliferation is the most sensitive and specific histological hallmark. Results from recent immunopathologic studies demonstrate marked activation of innate and adaptive immune pathways within portal tracts, underscoring the immune-mediated nature of bile duct injury. When interpreted by experienced pediatric pathologists, liver biopsy provides a high diagnostic yield and is pivotal for timely surgical decision-making.

Integrated Diagnostic Models and Emerging Approaches 

Recent advances emphasize multivariable diagnostic models over reliance on single tests. Predictive models incorporating clinical features (age, stool color, hepatomegaly) and biomarkers (total bilirubin, GGTP, MMP-7) have demonstrated substantially improved accuracy. Several contemporary studies report that models including MMP-7 achieve high sensitivity and specificity, facilitating earlier differentiation and expedited surgical referral.  

Screening algorithms that combine serum biomarkers with ultrasonographic parameters, such as gallbladder morphology and the triangular cord sign, show particular promise in high-volume centers, reducing diagnostic uncertainty and potentially decreasing the need for invasive investigations.  

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning tools are emerging adjuncts. Early validation studies demonstrate that AI-assisted interpretation of ultrasound, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and integrated clinical data can improve diagnostic consistency and reduce interobserver variability. While not yet standard of care, these tools represent a future framework for population-level screening and risk stratification.[32]

From an immunologic perspective, inflammatory and immune activation markers are under investigation. Distinct immune profiles characterized by persistent innate and adaptive activation are observed, reinforcing biliary atresia as an immune-mediated fibroinflammatory process and informing future biomarker-driven models.Together, these integrated diagnostic strategies reflect a shift from isolated testing toward structured, evidence-based pathways. Their adoption could shorten diagnostic latency, optimize the timing of Kasai portoenterostomy, and ultimately improve native liver survival in children with biliary atresia.

Treatment / Management

Despite advances in noninvasive diagnostics, surgical exploration remains the only definitive method for both confirming the diagnosis of biliary atresia and initiating curative-intent treatment. Once biliary atresia is strongly suspected, prompt operative evaluation is essential, as surgical timing is the single most important modifiable determinant of outcome.

Perioperative Cholangiography

Intraoperative cholangiography is the diagnostic gold standard. Failure of contrast passage into the intrahepatic and extrahepatic biliary system confirms biliary atresia and distinguishes it from other causes of neonatal cholestasis. When biliary patency is demonstrated, unnecessary portoenterostomy can be avoided. The routine use of perioperative cholangiography ensures diagnostic certainty and allows immediate transition to definitive surgical correction during the same operation.[33]

Kasai Portoenterostomy

The standard surgical treatment is the Roux-en-Y hepatic portoenterostomy, commonly referred to as the Kasai procedure. This operation involves complete excision of the fibrotic extrahepatic biliary remnant and meticulous transection of the fibrous portal plate, with dissection extending to the level of the portal vein bifurcation. A Roux-en-Y jejunal limb is then anastomosed directly to the exposed porta hepatis, allowing bile drainage from residual microscopic bile ductules.

Early performance of the Kasai procedure, ideally before 60 days of life, is strongly associated with improved bile flow, lower rates of cholangitis, and enhanced survival of the native liver. Data presented at recent international surgical meetings, including the 58th Annual Meeting of the Pacific Association of Pediatric Surgeons, continue to reinforce that age at surgery and quality of portal plate dissection are critical determinants of outcomes. Minimally invasive approaches to Kasai portoenterostomy have been explored. However, recent real-world cohort data comparing open and laparoscopic Kasai procedures in patients ultimately requiring liver transplantation demonstrate no clear long-term advantage of laparoscopy and suggest potential concerns regarding adequacy of portal plate dissection. Consequently, open Kasai portoenterostomy remains the preferred approach in most high-volume centers.[34](B2)

Alternative Surgical Techniques

In rare cases where the gallbladder and common bile duct are patent, portocholecystostomy has been described. However, this technique is limited by reduced anastomotic flexibility and a higher risk of recurrent biliary obstruction, often necessitating revision. Long-term outcomes are inferior to those of standard portoenterostomy, despite a slightly lower incidence of postoperative cholangitis. Hepaticojejunostomy has been attempted in select patients with type I biliary atresia, but outcomes are consistently inferior to the Kasai procedure, and it is not routinely recommended.

Postoperative Adjunctive Medical Therapy

Adjunctive pharmacologic therapy is commonly used following Kasai portoenterostomy to promote bile flow and reduce inflammation. Ursodeoxycholic acid, a hydrophilic bile acid, enhances bile secretion and is widely prescribed postoperatively. Corticosteroids have been extensively studied for their potential to reduce inflammatory injury and accelerate bile clearance.

Early randomized trials demonstrated increased rates of jaundice clearance with low-dose prednisolone but no improvement in transplant-free survival. The START trial further showed that high-dose steroid therapy did not improve bile drainage at 6 months and was associated with earlier and more frequent adverse effects. Current evidence does not support routine high-dose steroid use, and practice patterns vary across centers.[35] Antibiotic prophylaxis is often employed to reduce the risk of ascending cholangitis, particularly in the early postoperative period. Emerging data also suggest that CMV-associated biliary atresia may have a higher burden of postoperative cholangitis, underscoring the importance of tailored postoperative surveillance in this subgroup.[36][37](A1)

Liver Transplantation

Liver transplantation is the definitive therapy for children with failed Kasai portoenterostomy or advanced biliary cirrhosis. Indications include persistent cholestasis, recurrent cholangitis, portal hypertension, growth failure, and hepatic synthetic dysfunction. Advances in pediatric transplantation have led to excellent long-term survival, and transplantation is now viewed as a complementary rather than a competing strategy to portoenterostomy. The modern management paradigm emphasizes a sequential approach in which timely Kasai portoenterostomy is performed to maximize native liver survival, with early referral for transplantation evaluation when disease progression becomes evident. This integrated strategy has transformed biliary atresia from a universally fatal condition into a chronic disease with favorable long-term outcomes when managed in specialized centers.

Differential Diagnosis

Differentiating biliary atresia from other causes of neonatal cholestasis is essential, as several conditions share overlapping clinical and biochemical features but require fundamentally different management strategies. Unlike biliary atresia, many alternative diagnoses are managed medically or follow a nonprogressive course, making early distinction critical to avoid unnecessary surgery or delayed intervention. Key considerations include genetic, infectious, metabolic, and structural hepatobiliary disorders, including the following:

  • Alagille syndrome
  • Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency
  • TORCH (toxoplasmosis, others, rubella, CMV, herpes simplex virus)
  • Caroli disease
  • Choledochal cyst
  • Idiopathic neonatal hepatitis
  • Lipid metabolism disorders
  • Total parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis

Careful integration of clinical presentation, laboratory markers such as GGTP and MMP-7, imaging findings, and histopathology is often required to reliably distinguish biliary atresia from these entities, particularly in early infancy when features may be subtle.

Prognosis

Age at Initial Operation

Progression of hepatic fibrosis in biliary atresia is time-dependent, making early surgical intervention a critical determinant of outcome. However, the relationship between age at portoenterostomy and prognosis is not strictly linear. Earlier cohort analyses demonstrated that, in isolated biliary atresia, outcomes could not be reliably predicted by age alone up to approximately 90 days of life, suggesting that disease biology and postoperative bile flow also play major roles.

More recent data refine this understanding. Contemporary survival analyses, including 5-year outcome studies, confirm that surgery performed before 60 days of age is associated with higher rates of jaundice clearance and improved native liver survival, while outcomes decline progressively beyond 90 days. Nevertheless, age should not be used as an absolute exclusion criterion, as meaningful bile drainage and prolonged native liver survival have been documented even in later presenters when effective bile flow is achieved.[38][39][40]

Syndromic Biliary Atresia

Infants with syndromic biliary atresia, particularly those with biliary atresia splenic malformation syndrome, consistently demonstrate poorer outcomes following Kasai portoenterostomy. These patients often have advanced hepatic fibrosis at presentation and associated cardiovascular, vascular, and intestinal anomalies that complicate perioperative management. Multiple studies report lower rates of bile drainage, increased need for early liver transplantation, and higher mortality compared with isolated biliary atresia. Recent case-based reports further highlight diagnostic overlap between biliary atresia and other genetic syndromes, emphasizing the importance of careful phenotypic and genetic evaluation in atypical cases.

CMV-Associated Biliary Atresia

CMV IgM-positive biliary atresia represents a distinct inflammatory phenotype with the poorest overall prognosis. These infants present with higher bilirubin levels, elevated transaminases, and more severe portal inflammation on histology. Recent studies link CMV positivity to increased rates of postoperative cholangitis, accelerated fibrosis, and reduced transplant-free survival. Five-year survival analyses confirm CMV IgM positivity as an independent adverse prognostic factor following portoenterostomy, underscoring the need for intensified surveillance and early transplant planning in this subgroup.

Postoperative Bile Flow and Jaundice Clearance

Achievement of effective bile drainage after portoenterostomy is the strongest predictor of long-term native liver survival. Infants who clear jaundice within 3 to 6 months after surgery demonstrate significantly improved outcomes, whereas persistent cholestasis predicts early progression to cirrhosis and transplantation. Long-term follow-up studies show that patients surviving beyond 2 decades with their native liver typically exhibit normal or only mildly abnormal liver biochemistry in the early postoperative period. Serum markers measured after surgery have prognostic value. Lower bilirubin levels at 3 months and reduced gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase and aminotransferase levels at 1 year correlate with sustained hepatic function. Recent survival models further incorporate early postoperative trends in bilirubin and transaminases as key predictors of 5-year outcomes.

Histologic and Microscopic Ductal Factors

The size and density of residual microscopic bile ductules at the porta hepatis have been proposed as prognostic indicators, with larger and more numerous ductal structures theoretically facilitating bile drainage. Some histopathologic studies support this association, while others fail to demonstrate consistent predictive value, likely reflecting variability in sampling, surgical technique, and disease heterogeneity. Current consensus suggests that while ductal morphology may contribute to outcome, it is secondary to the quality of portal plate dissection and the postoperative inflammatory response.

Emerging Prognostic Factors

Recent studies have highlighted additional determinants of outcomes after portoenterostomy. Advanced liver fibrosis at diagnosis, elevated serum MMP-7 levels, recurrent postoperative cholangitis, and early development of portal hypertension are increasingly recognized as markers of poor prognosis. Immunologic profiling demonstrates persistent innate and adaptive immune activation in patients with unfavorable outcomes, linking immune-mediated injury to progressive fibrosis despite bile drainage.

Extrahepatic complications such as cirrhotic cardiomyopathy have also been described in children with longstanding biliary atresia, reflecting the systemic impact of chronic liver disease and influencing long-term morbidity. Collectively, these findings reinforce that the post-portoenterostomy outcome is multifactorial. While early surgery remains essential, disease phenotype, viral associations, immune activity, postoperative bile flow, and early biochemical response ultimately determine long-term survival of the native liver and the timing of liver transplantation.[24][41]

Complications

Despite successful portoenterostomy, biliary atresia remains a progressive fibroinflammatory disease. Postoperative complications are common and significantly influence long-term native liver survival, quality of life, and the timing of liver transplantation. Major complications include cholangitis, portal hypertension and its sequelae, ascites, intrahepatic biliary cyst formation, hepatopulmonary syndrome, and, rarely, malignancy:

Cholangitis

Ascending cholangitis is the most frequent and clinically significant complication, occurring in 40% to 60% of patients, with incidence peaking within the first postoperative year. The Roux-en-Y loop permits bacterial colonization, with additional risk factors including impaired bile flow and immune dysregulation. A 2025 meta-analysis of 57 studies has elucidated specific modifiable risk and protective factors. Key patient- and disease-related risk factors include age at surgery exceeding 60 days, high risk of malnutrition, low vitamin D Receptor expression, the presence of intrahepatic biliary cysts ("bile lakes"), and persistent postoperative jaundice.[42]

The CMV-associated phenotype is also associated with increased incidence and severity. Conversely, several interventions have been identified as protective factors, including the construction of an anti-reflux valve during surgery and postoperative administration of steroids (both standard- and high-dose regimens) or probiotics. Notably, evidence for routine prophylactic antibiotics remains inconsistent, with systematic reviews reporting conflicting efficacy findings.[43]

Clinically, cholangitis presents with fever, worsening jaundice, acholic stools, and elevated liver enzymes. Management requires prompt hospitalization with broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics. Recurrent or refractory episodes accelerate fibrosis, reduce native liver survival, and increase the hazard for progression to liver failure.

Portal hypertension and sequelae

Portal hypertension develops in most children due to progressive fibrosis, with severity correlating with age at surgery, degree of preoperative fibrosis, and recurrent cholangitis. Distinct immune activation profiles are observed in children with portal hypertension, supporting the concept of ongoing immune-mediated injury. The major sequelae of this define long-term morbidity:

  • Variceal bleeding
    • Esophageal and gastric varices develop in approximately 60% of patients with portal hypertension within 2 to 3 years, with nearly one-third experiencing a bleed. Management involves routine endoscopic surveillance, with acute bleeding requiring urgent band ligation or sclerotherapy.
  • Ascites
    • Managed with sodium restriction and diuretics (spironolactone as first-line therapy). Refractory ascites signals advanced disease and often precedes transplant referral.

Intrahepatic biliary cysts

These "bile lakes" within the cirrhotic liver serve as a persistent nidus for recurrent cholangitis. Prolonged or repeated antibiotic therapy is often required, with failure to control infection or associated progressive hepatic dysfunction constituting a strong indication for transplantation.

Hepatopulmonary syndrome and portopulmonary hypertension

Hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS) and portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH) are serious pulmonary vascular complications of long-standing portal hypertension. Results from a recent study underscore the grave prognostic implications of HPS, finding that pretransplant HPS is a strong independent predictor of poor posttransplant survival (17% in patients with HPS vs 83% in those without) and higher risks of post-transplant biliary complications. While HPS is characterized by intrapulmonary vascular dilatations causing hypoxemia, PoPH involves pulmonary arterial hypertension. The 2 may coexist, complicating management. Liver transplantation is the definitive therapy for HPS and can be considered for PoPH, highlighting the critical need for routine screening (eg, pulse oximetry, echocardiography) in long-term follow-up.[44][45]

Malignancy

Malignant transformation, while rare in childhood, is a critical long-term concern. A 2025 systematic review of 57 reported cases identified hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as the predominant malignancy (73.7%), followed by cholangiocarcinoma (14%). The risk escalates with prolonged native liver survival into adolescence and adulthood, with an estimated HCC incidence of 1% to 2%. Surveillance is challenging; no standardized protocol exists, and tumor markers like alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) lack sensitivity, as many HCC cases were AFP-negative. This necessitates a low threshold for imaging (ultrasound and MRI) in native liver survivors, underscoring that portoenterostomy is a disease-modifying, not curative, intervention.[46]

Postoperative and Rehabilitation Care

Management of biliary atresia has evolved from isolated surgical intervention to a longitudinal, integrated care model. Improvements in long-term survival reflect advances across the continuum: earlier diagnosis, refined surgical techniques, optimized perioperative and long-term medical management, and excellent outcomes following liver transplantation. Central to this progress is delivery of care within organized, high-volume centers supported by dedicated interprofessional teams.

The Imperative of Interprofessional and Centralized Care

Optimal outcomes are consistently achieved at expert centers that have sufficient caseloads to maintain surgical proficiency and comprehensive multidisciplinary support. Integrated pediatric liver programs consolidate pediatric hepatologists, transplant surgeons, specialized radiologists and pathologists, nutritionists, and psychosocial support under 1 coordinated system.[47] High-volume centers demonstrate markedly superior outcomes: 1 seminal study reported 5-year native liver survival (NLS) of 61.3% versus 13.7% and overall survival (OS) of 91.2% versus 75% in centers managing more than 5 cases annually, compared with low-volume centers. European initiatives such as the European Reference Network on Rare Hepatological Diseases exemplify structured centralization, promoting standardization of care, complex case discussion, and registry-based quality improvement through programs like the European Biliary Atresia Registry.[48]

Contemporary Survival Outcomes and Trends

Long-term outcomes have improved steadily, paralleling institutional experience and the implementation of standardized care protocols. A 2025 single-institution analysis over three decades reported a 10-year NLS of 52.4% and OS of 69.6%. Patients treated in the most recent era (2011–2022) achieved NLS of 64.8% and OS of 85.2%, reflecting cumulative improvements in surgical and perioperative care.

International benchmarks reinforce these trends:

  • England and Wales report 10-year OS ~90%, with approximately half retaining native liver at 5 to 10 years.
  • Finland, with a highly centralized system, achieves a 5-year NLS of 70%.
  • In the United States, recent multicenter data show a 2-year OS of 86%.

For children requiring liver transplantation, outcomes are excellent: United States data demonstrate more than 90% 5-year posttransplant survival, with long-term overall survival at 30 years posttransplant around 80%.

Drivers of Improvement: Early Detection, Timely Surgery, and Cost-Effectiveness

Age at Kasai portoenterostomy (KPE) remains a key modifiable prognostic factor. Surgery before 60 days of life is associated with the highest likelihood of durable bile drainage. Structured screening programs, including infant stool color cards (SCC) in Japan, Taiwan, Switzerland, France, and Germany, enable parents to identify acholic stools early, expediting evaluation. In Taiwan, SCC implementation increased the 60-day pre-Kasai rate from 47% to 74% and improved 3-month post-Kasai jaundice clearance from 37% to 60%. Early successful Kasai is also cost-effective. A European analysis estimates savings of approximately €27,000 over the first decade for children achieving long-term NLS compared with the substantially higher costs of early KPE failure and liver transplantation.

Prognostication and Personalized Follow-up

Postoperative monitoring is essential for risk stratification and personalized care. Early jaundice clearance (total bilirubin ≤20 µmol/L within 3 months post-KPE) is a strong predictor of success. Additionally, a 2025 study identified the 3-month postoperative aspartate-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) score as a powerful prognostic tool; an APRI  greater than 1.12 predicts poorer long-term NLS, supporting early identification of patients who may benefit from intensified surveillance or expedited transplant evaluation.[49]

Deterrence and Patient Education

Parents should be informed that the initial success rate of a Kasai portoenterostomy in achieving bile flow is approximately 60%. Patients are less likely to require liver transplantation if the surgery is performed within 10 weeks of life. Early diagnosis increases the chances of survival with the native liver. Any child with jaundice, clay-colored stools, and dark urine should be investigated for biliary atresia, and proper referral to a specialty center should be given. Stool color charts and a stool color mobile app have been introduced to increase awareness and encourage early referral.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Optimal management of biliary atresia requires early recognition, rapid diagnostic evaluation, and coordinated multidisciplinary intervention to preserve native liver function and improve survival. Physicians and advanced practitioners must maintain a high index of suspicion for neonatal cholestasis, promptly interpret fractional bilirubin levels, liver enzymes, and imaging results, and expedite referral to pediatric surgery and hepatology. Surgical teams rely on timely collaboration with neonatology, radiology, and anesthesia to safely perform Kasai portoenterostomy within the critical early window. Nurses play a central role in monitoring jaundice progression, stool color, growth parameters, and postoperative complications such as cholangitis, while ensuring family education and adherence to follow-up plans. Clear, structured communication among team members, using standardized handoffs and shared care plans, is essential to minimize delays, reduce errors, and maintain continuity across inpatient and outpatient settings.

Pharmacists and dietitians further enhance patient-centered care by optimizing medication regimens, including antibiotics, ursodeoxycholic acid, and fat-soluble vitamin supplementation, while addressing complex nutritional needs related to malabsorption and growth failure. Social workers and care coordinators facilitate access to subspecialty care, transplant evaluation, and family support services, helping families navigate a high-burden chronic disease. Regular multidisciplinary case reviews and longitudinal care coordination improve team performance by aligning treatment goals, anticipating complications such as portal hypertension, and planning timely liver transplantation when indicated. This integrated, interprofessional approach promotes patient safety, improves clinical outcomes, and supports families through the evolving course of biliary atresia.

References


[1]

Garcia AV, Cowles RA, Kato T, Hardy MA. Morio Kasai: a remarkable impact beyond the Kasai procedure. Journal of pediatric surgery. 2012 May:47(5):1023-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.01.065. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 22595595]


[2]

Ramachandran P, Safwan M, Srinivas S, Shanmugam N, Vij M, Rela M. The extended Kasai portoenterostomy for biliary atresia: A preliminary report. Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons. 2016 Apr-Jun:21(2):66-71. doi: 10.4103/0971-9261.176941. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 27046977]


[3]

LeeVan E, Matsuoka L, Cao S, Groshen S, Alexopoulos S. Biliary-Enteric Drainage vs Primary Liver Transplant as Initial Treatment for Children With Biliary Atresia. JAMA surgery. 2019 Jan 1:154(1):26-32. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.3180. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 30208381]


[4]

Lakshminarayanan B, Davenport M. Biliary atresia: A comprehensive review. Journal of autoimmunity. 2016 Sep:73():1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Jun 23     [PubMed PMID: 27346637]


[5]

Davenport M. Biliary atresia: From Australia to the zebrafish. Journal of pediatric surgery. 2016 Feb:51(2):200-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.10.058. Epub 2015 Nov 4     [PubMed PMID: 26653951]


[6]

Tan CE, Driver M, Howard ER, Moscoso GJ. Extrahepatic biliary atresia: a first-trimester event? Clues from light microscopy and immunohistochemistry. Journal of pediatric surgery. 1994 Jun:29(6):808-14     [PubMed PMID: 7521396]


[7]

Shi Z, Han Y, Jin H, Zhang X, Wang L, Tou J, Xie S. Another ciliopathy? Uncovering the ciliary basis of biliary atresia. Hepatology international. 2025 Dec 17:():. doi: 10.1007/s12072-025-10995-0. Epub 2025 Dec 17     [PubMed PMID: 41405813]


[8]

Vig A, Elhence P, Rathod KJ, Nayak S, Jadhav AS, Pathak M, Saxena R, Sinha A. Effect of Cytomegalovirus Infection on Initial Presentation and Overall Prognosis of Biliary Atresia Patients. Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons. 2023 Jan-Feb:28(1):5-8. doi: 10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_92_22. Epub 2023 Jan 10     [PubMed PMID: 36910295]


[9]

Yudhananto BA, Munandhar MA, Nurhidayah SS, Purwosatrio PG, Megasakti B, Maisaroh S, Tonda KC, Adhityo P, Purnomo E, Gunadi. Cytomegalovirus infection impact on cholangitis in patients with biliary atresia following the Kasai procedure. The Medical journal of Malaysia. 2025 Dec:80(Suppl 7):14-20     [PubMed PMID: 41451716]


[10]

Lee CJ, Hu YC, Chang HH, Chang KC, Tai CS, Ni YH, Chang MH, Wu JF. The relationship between lymphocyte subtypes distribution and biliary cirrhosis in biliary atresia patients. Pediatrics and neonatology. 2025 Nov 13:():. pii: S1875-9572(25)00204-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2025.07.004. Epub 2025 Nov 13     [PubMed PMID: 41309359]


[11]

Davenport M. Biliary atresia: clinical aspects. Seminars in pediatric surgery. 2012 Aug:21(3):175-84. doi: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2012.05.010. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 22800970]


[12]

Davenport M, Tizzard SA, Underhill J, Mieli-Vergani G, Portmann B, Hadzić N. The biliary atresia splenic malformation syndrome: a 28-year single-center retrospective study. The Journal of pediatrics. 2006 Sep:149(3):393-400     [PubMed PMID: 16939755]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[13]

Aldeiri B, Giamouris V, Pushparajah K, Miller O, Baker A, Davenport M. Cardiac-associated biliary atresia (CABA): a prognostic subgroup. Archives of disease in childhood. 2021 Jan:106(1):68-72. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-319122. Epub 2020 Jul 20     [PubMed PMID: 32690577]


[14]

Tian Y, Chen S, Ji C, Wang XP, Ye M, Chen XY, Luo JF, Li X, Li L. Early postnatal characteristics and differential diagnosis of choledochal cyst and cystic biliary atresia. World journal of gastroenterology. 2025 Sep 7:31(33):108369. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i33.108369. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 40933458]


[15]

Davenport M. Updates in Biliary Atresia: Aetiology, Diagnosis and Surgery. Children (Basel, Switzerland). 2025 Jan 16:12(1):. doi: 10.3390/children12010095. Epub 2025 Jan 16     [PubMed PMID: 39857926]


[16]

Okubo R, Nio M, Sasaki H, Wada M. Japanese biliary atresia registry. World journal of pediatric surgery. 2025:8(2):e001024. doi: 10.1136/wjps-2025-001024. Epub 2025 May 26     [PubMed PMID: 40433107]


[17]

Okubo R, Nio M, Sasaki H, Fukuzawa T, Kudo H, Ando R, Sakurai T, Hashimoto M, Tada K, Wada M, Japanese Biliary Atresia Society. Portal hypertension in biliary atresia: a Japanese biliary atresia registry study. Pediatric surgery international. 2025 Oct 31:41(1):324. doi: 10.1007/s00383-025-06222-4. Epub 2025 Oct 31     [PubMed PMID: 41171449]


[18]

Davenport M, De Ville de Goyet J, Stringer MD, Mieli-Vergani G, Kelly DA, McClean P, Spitz L. Seamless management of biliary atresia in England and Wales (1999-2002). Lancet (London, England). 2004 Apr 24:363(9418):1354-7     [PubMed PMID: 15110492]


[19]

Wada H, Muraji T, Yokoi A, Okamoto T, Sato S, Takamizawa S, Tsugawa J, Nishijima E. Insignificant seasonal and geographical variation in incidence of biliary atresia in Japan: a regional survey of over 20 years. Journal of pediatric surgery. 2007 Dec:42(12):2090-2     [PubMed PMID: 18082714]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[20]

Zhang S, Wu Y, Liu Z, Tao Q, Huang J, Yang W. Hepatic pathology of biliary atresia: A new comprehensive evaluation method using liver biopsy. The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology. 2016 May:27(3):257-63. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2016.15316. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 27210782]


[21]

Hartley JL, Davenport M, Kelly DA. Biliary atresia. Lancet (London, England). 2009 Nov 14:374(9702):1704-13. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60946-6. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 19914515]


[22]

Nugraheni DU, Sandewa AT, Dennis, Adhityo P, Gani R, Purwosatrio PG, Maharani M, Puspitawati I, Makhmudi A, Gunadi. Prognostic factors for five-year survival in children with biliary atresia after the Kasai procedure. The Medical journal of Malaysia. 2025 Dec:80(Suppl 7):1-7     [PubMed PMID: 41451714]


[23]

Di Dato F, Iorio R, Kyrana E, Ma Y, Grammatikopoulos T. The immunological profile of children with portal hypertension. Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver. 2026 Feb:58(2):171-181. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2025.11.025. Epub 2025 Dec 20     [PubMed PMID: 41423404]


[24]

Davenport M. Syndromic variants of biliary atresia. World journal of pediatric surgery. 2025:8(3):e001040. doi: 10.1136/wjps-2025-001040. Epub 2025 Jun 8     [PubMed PMID: 40519534]


[25]

Zhou SY, Zhan X, Li SY. Prompt distinction of Alagille syndrome and biliary Atresia in infants: a comparative study. BMC pediatrics. 2025 Jul 9:25(1):543. doi: 10.1186/s12887-025-05896-y. Epub 2025 Jul 9     [PubMed PMID: 40634917]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[26]

Ihn K, Ho IG, Chang EY, Han SJ. Correlation between gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase activity and outcomes after Kasai portoenterostomy for biliary atresia. Journal of pediatric surgery. 2018 Mar:53(3):461-467. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.10.001. Epub 2017 Oct 6     [PubMed PMID: 29056230]


[27]

Japanese Biliary Atresia Society. Prediction of Native Liver Survival in Patients With Biliary Atresia 20 Years After the Kasai Procedure. Journal of pediatric surgery. 2025 Mar:60(3):162158. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2025.162158. Epub 2025 Jan 8     [PubMed PMID: 39837209]


[28]

Ma JN, Zhang MX, Chi SQ, Cao GQ, Zhang X, Zhou Y, Rong LY, Tang ST. Diagnostic performance of serum MMP-7 in biliary atresia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International journal of surgery (London, England). 2025 Dec 16:():. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000004293. Epub 2025 Dec 16     [PubMed PMID: 41405291]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[29]

Zhang Y, Li T, Wang T, Ji Q, Zhan J. Comparison for the diagnostic performance of early diagnostic methods for biliary atresia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Pediatric surgery international. 2024 Jun 1:40(1):146. doi: 10.1007/s00383-024-05730-z. Epub 2024 Jun 1     [PubMed PMID: 38822892]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[30]

Mittal V, Saxena AK, Sodhi KS, Thapa BR, Rao KL, Das A, Khandelwal N. Role of abdominal sonography in the preoperative diagnosis of extrahepatic biliary atresia in infants younger than 90 days. AJR. American journal of roentgenology. 2011 Apr:196(4):W438-45. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5180. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 21427309]


[31]

Wang L, Yang Y, Chen Y, Zhan J. Early differential diagnosis methods of biliary atresia: a meta-analysis. Pediatric surgery international. 2018 Apr:34(4):363-380. doi: 10.1007/s00383-018-4229-1. Epub 2018 Feb 3     [PubMed PMID: 29397405]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[32]

Elsayed H, Singer G, Till T, Till H. Latest Developments in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Models in General Pediatric Surgery. European journal of pediatric surgery : official journal of Austrian Association of Pediatric Surgery ... [et al] = Zeitschrift fur Kinderchirurgie. 2026 Apr:36(2):157-164. doi: 10.1055/a-2689-8280. Epub 2025 Aug 26     [PubMed PMID: 40858266]


[33]

Shreef K, Alhelal A. Evaluation of the use of laparoscopic-guided cholecystocholangiography and liver biopsy in definitive diagnosis of neonatal cholestatic jaundice. African journal of paediatric surgery : AJPS. 2016 Oct-Dec:13(4):181-184. doi: 10.4103/0189-6725.194667. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 28051047]


[34]

Zhang Y, Qiu Y, Wang S, Liu J, Ke X, Liu S, Sun R, Zhao Y, Li X, Zhao S, Zhang Z, Wei X, Gao W, Zhan J. Comparative outcomes of open and laparoscopic Kasai portoenterostomy for biliary Atresia patients progressing to liver transplantation: A Real-World cohort study. Surgery today. 2025 Dec 12:():. doi: 10.1007/s00595-025-03210-y. Epub 2025 Dec 12     [PubMed PMID: 41384976]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[35]

Bezerra JA, Spino C, Magee JC, Shneider BL, Rosenthal P, Wang KS, Erlichman J, Haber B, Hertel PM, Karpen SJ, Kerkar N, Loomes KM, Molleston JP, Murray KF, Romero R, Schwarz KB, Shepherd R, Suchy FJ, Turmelle YP, Whitington PF, Moore J, Sherker AH, Robuck PR, Sokol RJ, Childhood Liver Disease Research and Education Network (ChiLDREN). Use of corticosteroids after hepatoportoenterostomy for bile drainage in infants with biliary atresia: the START randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014 May 7:311(17):1750-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2623. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 24794368]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[36]

Jeropoulos RM, Arroyo J, Davenport M. Predicting and optimising outcome for biliary atresia. Seminars in pediatric surgery. 2024 Dec:33(6):151479. doi: 10.1016/j.sempedsurg.2025.151479. Epub 2025 Jan 16     [PubMed PMID: 39884180]


[37]

Zhao Y, Xu X, Meng Y, Zhou C, Zheng B, Zhang X, Wang B, Duan X, Liu Y, Feng J, Zhu J, Zhang Z, Chen Y, Lv Z, Hu Y, Ren H, Huang L, Li Y, Ge L, Zhang H, Liu X, Li W, Cui Q, Zhan J. Cytomegalovirus infection in infants with biliary atresia in China: a multi-center investigation study. Frontiers in pediatrics. 2025:13():1577113. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1577113. Epub 2025 Jun 6     [PubMed PMID: 40547136]


[38]

Tian Y, Lian H, Ye M, Shao Y, Geng Y, Chen Z, Chen S, Xuli, Longli. Evaluating the role of Kasai portoenterostomy in biliary atresia older than 90 days. Pediatric surgery international. 2025 Sep 4:41(1):285. doi: 10.1007/s00383-025-06184-7. Epub 2025 Sep 4     [PubMed PMID: 40908322]


[39]

Jiao C, Yu K, Li D, Fu K, Wang P, He Y, Feng J. A retrospective study of the ideal operation time for preterm biliary atresia patients. Pediatric surgery international. 2019 Jun:35(6):679-684. doi: 10.1007/s00383-019-04464-7. Epub 2019 Feb 25     [PubMed PMID: 30805663]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[40]

Dong H, Liu JY, Jiang YZ, Sun LY, Wang YX. The Effect of a Kasai Procedure on Liver Transplantation in Children with Biliary Atresia: A Cohort Study. Journal of clinical medicine. 2025 May 10:14(10):. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103328. Epub 2025 May 10     [PubMed PMID: 40429324]


[41]

Hukkinen M, Fischler B, Liliemark U, Gatzinsky V, Ekvall N, Almaas R, Elmi H, Madadi-Sanjani O, Obed M, Christensen VB, Helt TW, Johansen LS, Davenport M, Pakarinen MP. Multicenter Study on Early Predictors of Biliary Atresia Outcomes. Journal of pediatric surgery. 2025 Sep:60(9):162404. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2025.162404. Epub 2025 Jun 7     [PubMed PMID: 40490075]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[42]

Liu X, Wang Y, Han J, Qi Y, Zhang X, Ma C, Sun D, Xu Q, He X, Ren X, Wang D, Li A. Risk factors for cholangitis after Kasai procedure in biliary atresia patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International journal of surgery (London, England). 2025 Dec 1:111(12):9726-9741. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000003227. Epub 2025 Aug 22     [PubMed PMID: 40844888]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[43]

Alatas FS, Lazarus G, Junaidi MC, Oswari H. Prophylactic Antibiotics to Prevent Cholangitis in Children with Biliary Atresia After Kasai Portoenterostomy: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition. 2023 Nov 1:77(5):648-654. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000003935. Epub 2023 Sep 14     [PubMed PMID: 37705401]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[44]

Chen JY, Chang MH, Ho MC, Peng SF, Hsu WM, Lin WH, Wu JF. Hepatopulmonary syndrome in biliary atresia children increased postoperative complications after liver transplantation. Pediatrics and neonatology. 2025 Jul:66(4):363-367. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2024.06.012. Epub 2024 Nov 14     [PubMed PMID: 39580337]


[45]

Aragon Pinto C, Iyer VN, Albitar HAH, Anderson A, Cajigas H, Simonetto DA, Krowka MJ, DuBrock HM, Gallo de Moraes A. Outcomes of liver transplantation in patients with hepatopulmonary syndrome in the pre and post-MELD eras: A systematic review. Respiratory medicine and research. 2021 Nov:80():100852. doi: 10.1016/j.resmer.2021.100852. Epub 2021 Jul 30     [PubMed PMID: 34418867]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[46]

Madadi-Sanjani O, Fischer L, Uecker M, Tomuschat C, Herden U, Sterneck M, Hegen B. Cancer surveillance in biliary atresia patients with native liver survival: Standardizing monitoring and follow-up. Pediatric surgery international. 2025 Jun 12:41(1):165. doi: 10.1007/s00383-025-06066-y. Epub 2025 Jun 12     [PubMed PMID: 40504251]


[47]

Davenport M, Makin E, Ong EG, Sharif K, Dawrant M, Alizai N. The Outcome of a Centralization Program in Biliary Atresia: Twenty Years and Beyond. Annals of surgery. 2025 Apr 1:281(4):608-614. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006273. Epub 2024 Mar 20     [PubMed PMID: 38506040]


[48]

Leonhardt J, Kuebler JF, Leute PJ, Turowski C, Becker T, Pfister ED, Ure B, Petersen C. Biliary atresia: lessons learned from the voluntary German registry. European journal of pediatric surgery : official journal of Austrian Association of Pediatric Surgery ... [et al] = Zeitschrift fur Kinderchirurgie. 2011 Mar:21(2):82-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1268476. Epub 2010 Dec 14     [PubMed PMID: 21157692]


[49]

Emre S, Benibol Y, Hakalmaz AE, Karakurt B, Kalyoncu Ucar A, Kepil N, Beşer ÖF, Kuruğoğlu S, Senyuz OF. Three decades of progress: evolution of outcomes and prognostic indicators in biliary atresia management. BMC pediatrics. 2025 Jul 2:25(1):516. doi: 10.1186/s12887-025-05848-6. Epub 2025 Jul 2     [PubMed PMID: 40604547]