Back To Search Results

Antihypertensive Medications

Editor: Preeti Patel Updated: 5/26/2026 4:09:27 AM

Indications

Blood Pressure Classification and Treatment Thresholds

The 2025 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guideline retains the blood pressure classification system established in 2017, as mentioned below.

  • Normal blood pressure: Systolic blood pressure <120 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure <80 mm Hg
  • Elevated blood pressure: Systolic blood pressure 120 to 129 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure <80 mm Hg
  • Stage 1 hypertension: Systolic blood pressure 130 to 139 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure 80 to 89 mm Hg
  • Stage 2 hypertension: Systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg
  • Hypertensive crisis: Systolic blood pressure >180 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure >120 mm Hg [1]

A key advancement in the 2025 guideline is the adoption of the AHA PREVENT (Predicting Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Events) calculator, replacing the earlier pooled cohort equations. The PREVENT calculator estimates 10-year and 30-year cardiovascular risk by incorporating estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), social determinants of health, and statin use, and notably excludes race as a variable in risk estimation.[1][2]

Treatment recommendations in the 2025 guideline include:

  • All adults with elevated blood pressure should initiate lifestyle modifications, including weight management, adherence to a Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH)-style dietary pattern, sodium restriction (<1500 mg/d), increased physical activity (150 min/week of moderate-intensity exercise), and limiting alcohol intake.
  • Adults with stage 1 hypertension and a 10-year PREVENT cardiovascular risk score ≥7.5% should initiate pharmacotherapy, with a target blood pressure of less than 130/80 mm Hg. In adults with a risk score of less than 7.5%, lifestyle modification is recommended for 3 to 6 months before considering pharmacotherapy.
  • Adults with stage 2 hypertension (≥140/90 mm Hg) should initiate pharmacotherapy with a single-pill combination of 2 first-line antihypertensive agents from different classes, regardless of cardiovascular risk level.
  • The recommended blood pressure target for most adults is less than 130/80 mm Hg, with individualized treatment exceptions for patients in long-term care, those with limited life expectancy, and pregnant individuals.
  • Home blood pressure monitoring and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring are both recommended to confirm the diagnosis of hypertension and support ongoing blood pressure management.[1]

First-Line Antihypertensive Drug Classes

The 2025 ACC/AHA guideline recommends the below 4 first-line antihypertensive drug classes.

  • Thiazide and thiazide-like diuretics: Chlorthalidone, indapamide, and hydrochlorothiazide
  • Dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers: Amlodipine and nifedipine
  • Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: Lisinopril, ramipril, enalapril, and perindopril
  • Angiotensin II receptor blockers: Losartan, valsartan, telmisartan, and olmesartan [1]

The 2025 guideline eliminates race-based prescribing recommendations. Previous guidelines recommended calcium channel blockers or thiazides as first-line agents for Black patients; the updated guideline now recommends all 4 first-line classes for all patients, with individualized selection based on comorbidities and patient-specific factors rather than race.

Thiazide and Thiazide-Like Diuretics

Thiazide-type diuretics (eg, hydrochlorothiazide) have the strongest evidence base for reducing cardiovascular outcomes in hypertension. Results from the landmark Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) demonstrated that chlorthalidone at a dosage of 12.5 to 25 mg/d was at least as effective as amlodipine and lisinopril in preventing the risk of fatal coronary heart disease and nonfatal myocardial infarction, and was superior to lisinopril in preventing stroke and heart failure.[3] Chlorthalidone was also associated with a lower incidence of pelvic fractures compared to amlodipine and lisinopril, making it a preferred choice in patients with osteoporosis.[4]

Thiazide-like diuretics (eg, chlorthalidone and indapamide) have traditionally been considered superior to hydrochlorothiazide owing to longer duration of action and greater 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure reduction.[5] However, the 2022 Diuretic Comparison Project, a pragmatic randomized trial of 13,523 veterans, found no significant difference in major cardiovascular outcomes between chlorthalidone and hydrochlorothiazide (hazard ratio [HR] 1.04; 95% CI 0.94-1.16; P=.45), although chlorthalidone was associated with higher hypokalemia rates (6.0% vs 4.4%, P<.001).[6] This important finding has nuanced the previously strong preference for chlorthalidone, although the trial enrolled predominantly older men who were already receiving hydrochlorothiazide and had relatively well-controlled blood pressure at baseline. Indapamide has demonstrated reductions in cardiovascular outcomes in findings from the Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET) trial in patients aged 80 or older and in the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease (ADVANCE) trial in patients with type 2 diabetes.[7][8] The 2025 ACC/AHA guideline lists all thiazide-type diuretics as acceptable first-line agents.

Calcium Channel Blockers

Calcium channel blockers are effective first-line antihypertensives that reduce all cardiovascular events, comparable to thiazide diuretics, except heart failure.[3] Calcium channel blockers are classified into dihydropyridines and nondihydropyridines. Dihydropyridines (eg, amlodipine, nifedipine, and felodipine) primarily relax vascular smooth muscle and are the preferred subclass for the treatment of hypertension. In findings from the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial—Blood Pressure Lowering Arm (ASCOT-BPLA) trial, the amlodipine-perindopril regimen was superior to atenolol-bendroflumethiazide in reducing total cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality and was associated with fewer new-onset cases of diabetes mellitus.[9] 

Amlodipine demonstrated consistent antihypertensive efficacy regardless of body weight, whereas thiazides were less effective in patients with normal body mass index.[10] Nondihydropyridines (eg, diltiazem and verapamil) have additional negative chronotropic and inotropic effects, making them useful for concurrent rate control in atrial fibrillation but relatively contraindicated in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, second- and third-degree heart block, and sick sinus syndrome.[11]

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are the preferred first-line agents for patients with heart failure, chronic kidney disease (CKD) with proteinuria, diabetes mellitus with albuminuria, post–myocardial infarction, and left ventricular systolic dysfunction.[1] Both classes offer cardioprotective and renoprotective effects independent of blood pressure lowering. Results from the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) trial demonstrated that ramipril reduced cardiovascular death by 26%, myocardial infarction by 20%, and stroke by 32% in patients at high risk with vascular disease or diabetes mellitus.[12] Results from the European Trial on Reduction of Cardiac Events With Perindopril in Stable Coronary Artery Disease (EUROPA) showed that perindopril reduced cardiovascular events by 20% in patients with stable coronary artery disease.[13] 

Results from the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) trial demonstrated that losartan was superior to atenolol in reducing the composite of cardiovascular death, stroke, and myocardial infarction in patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy, with a particularly striking 25% stroke reduction.[14] Results from the Ongoing Telmisartan Alone and in Combination With Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial (ONTARGET) confirmed that telmisartan was noninferior to ramipril for cardiovascular outcomes and associated with fewer cases of angioedema, establishing ARBs as a fully equivalent alternative to ACE inhibitors. Importantly, combination ACE inhibitor and ARB therapy offered no additional benefit and increased adverse effects, including hypotension, syncope, and renal dysfunction.[15]

Beta Blockers

Beta (β)-blockers are no longer considered first-line agents for uncomplicated hypertension in any current major guideline.[1][16] Their primary indications in patients with hypertension are heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (carvedilol, metoprolol succinate, bisoprolol), post–myocardial infarction secondary prevention, and rate control in atrial fibrillation.[16] Results from meta-analyses have demonstrated that β-blockers are inferior to other antihypertensive classes in preventing stroke, particularly in older adults.[16][17] Atenolol, in particular, has been associated with increased stroke risk compared to losartan (LIFE trial) and amlodipine (ASCOT-BPLA trial).[9][14] Vasodilating β-blockers (eg, carvedilol, nebivolol, and labetalol) may offer superior hemodynamic profiles compared to traditional agents, although outcome data are more limited.

Combination Therapy

A major evolution in the 2025 ACC/AHA guideline is the recommendation to initiate single-pill combination therapy for patients with stage 2 hypertension (greater than or equal to 140/90 mm Hg), rather than starting with monotherapy and uptitrating.[1] This approach is supported by evidence that combining 2 antihypertensive classes yields approximately a 5-fold greater reduction in blood pressure than doubling the dose of a single agent.[18] Single-pill combinations improve adherence and accelerate time to blood pressure control.

Results from the Avoiding Cardiovascular Events Through Combination Therapy in Patients Living With Systolic Hypertension (ACCOMPLISH) trial demonstrated that benazepril-amlodipine was superior to benazepril-hydrochlorothiazide in reducing cardiovascular events (HR 0.80; P<.001) and slowed nephropathy progression.[19] Results from the ASCOT-BPLA trial confirmed the superiority of amlodipine-perindopril over atenolol-bendroflumethiazide.[9] 

The preferred 2-drug combinations include:

  • ACE inhibitor or ARB+dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (strongest evidence base)
  • ACE inhibitor or ARB+thiazide-type diuretic
  • Dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker+thiazide-type diuretic

Dual renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade (ACE inhibitor plus ARB, or either with direct renin inhibitor aliskiren) is contraindicated because of increased risk of hyperkalemia, hypotension, and renal dysfunction without added benefit.[15] β-Blocker–diuretic combinations are associated with higher rates of new-onset diabetes mellitus and should be reserved for patients with compelling indications for β-blockers.[9]

Resistant Hypertension and Add-On Agents

Resistant hypertension is defined as blood pressure above goal despite optimal doses of 3 antihypertensive agents from different classes, including a diuretic, or as blood pressure controlled with 4 or more agents. The 2025 guideline recommends a systematic evaluation of secondary causes, medication nonadherence, and the white-coat effect before escalating therapy.[1]

Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists

Spironolactone is the preferred fourth-line agent for resistant hypertension, supported by the Prevention And Treatment of Hypertension With Algorithm-Based Therapy 2 (PATHWAY-2) trial, which demonstrated spironolactone was superior to placebo (−8.70 mm Hg), doxazosin (−4.03 mm Hg), and bisoprolol (−4.48 mm Hg) in reducing home systolic blood pressure when added to triple therapy.[20] Eplerenone is an alternative with fewer antiandrogenic adverse effects.

Loop Diuretics

Loop diuretics (eg, furosemide, bumetanide, and torsemide) are preferred over thiazides when the eGFR is less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m², where thiazide efficacy diminishes.[21] These agents are not first-line for hypertension but are essential in patients with concurrent volume overload, heart failure, or advanced CKD.

Hydralazine

Hydralazine, a direct arteriolar vasodilator, remains useful as add-on therapy for resistant hypertension, and it is specifically indicated in combination with isosorbide dinitrate for heart failure in self-identified Black patients (African-American Heart Failure Trial [A-HeFT]).[22] Reflex tachycardia and sodium retention typically require concurrent use of a β-blocker and a diuretic.

Central α2 Agonists

Clonidine (preferably a transdermal formulation) and guanfacine serve as add-on agents when other therapies fail. Abrupt discontinuation of oral clonidine can precipitate a rebound hypertensive crisis. The transdermal patch is preferred, as it provides more stable drug levels.

Direct Vasodilators

Minoxidil is a potent arteriolar vasodilator reserved for severe, resistant hypertension refractory to other agents. Minoxidil requires concurrent therapy with a loop diuretic to counter fluid retention and a β-blocker to counter reflex tachycardia. Hirsutism is a common cosmetically limiting adverse effect.[23]

α1 Receptor Antagonists

α1 Receptor antagonists (eg, doxazosin, prazosin, and terazosin) are not recommended as monotherapy for hypertension. Results from the ALLHAT doxazosin arm demonstrated a 25% higher incidence of cardiovascular events, primarily heart failure, compared with chlorthalidone.[24] They may serve as add-on agents in resistant hypertension, particularly in men with concurrent benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Emerging and Novel Antihypertensive Drug Classes Endothelin Receptor Antagonists: Aprocitentan

Aprocitentan (Tryvio) is a dual endothelin receptor antagonist (ETA and ETB) that received approval from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in March 2024 for the treatment of resistant hypertension. Aprocitentan represents the first antihypertensive with a novel mechanism of action approved in nearly 4 decades.[25] Results from the phase 3 PRECISION trial (n=730) demonstrated that aprocitentan 12.5 mg and 25 mg daily, added to standardized triple therapy (ARB plus calcium channel blocker plus thiazide-type diuretic), reduced sitting office systolic blood pressure by 15.3 and 15.2 mm Hg, respectively, at 4 weeks, compared with 11.5 mm Hg with placebo (placebo-subtracted difference, −3.8 to −3.7 mm Hg). For 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure, the placebo-subtracted reductions were −4.2 mm Hg and −5.9 mm Hg for the 12.5 mg and 25 mg doses, respectively. The blood pressure–lowering effect was sustained at 40 weeks.[25] 

Aprocitentan also demonstrated efficacy in patients with advanced CKD who did not have hyperkalemia or reduced proteinuria. The approved dose of aprocitentan is 12.5 mg once daily. The most common adverse effects are peripheral edema and fluid retention (9% to 18% depending on dose), necessitating careful monitoring in patients prone to fluid overload. Aprocitentan is contraindicated in pregnancy because of teratogenicity and requires the Tryvio Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy program, including pregnancy testing and contraception counseling.[25]

Aldosterone Synthase Inhibitors: Baxdrostat and Lorundrostat

Aldosterone synthase inhibitors represent a novel approach to targeting aldosterone-mediated hypertension by selectively inhibiting CYP11B2 (aldosterone synthase) without affecting CYP11B1 (cortisol synthesis). This selectivity offers a theoretical advantage over mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, as it reduces aldosterone production at its source while preserving cortisol homeostasis.[26] Results from the phase 2 trial published in the New England Journal of Medicine demonstrated that baxdrostat produced dose-dependent reductions in blood pressure, with placebo-subtracted reductions in systolic blood pressure of −11.0 mm Hg (2 mg) and −8.1 mm Hg (1 mg) in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension.[27]

The phase 3 BaxHTN trial confirmed efficacy, and the Bax24 trial demonstrated a placebo-adjusted reduction of 14.0 mm Hg in 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure. The FDA accepted the baxdrostat New Drug Application under Priority Review in 2025.[28] No cases of adrenocortical insufficiency were observed in trials. Lorundrostat, another aldosterone synthase inhibitor, demonstrated significant blood pressure reductions in phase 2 trials in uncontrolled hypertension. The phase 3 LAUNCH-HTN trial enrolled adults at 159 sites across 13 countries, including those with treatment-resistant hypertension.[29]

Nonsteroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists: Finerenone

Finerenone is a third-generation nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist with greater selectivity for the mineralocorticoid receptor and a distinct tissue distribution compared with spironolactone and eplerenone. While its primary indications are cardiorenal protection in type 2 diabetes with CKD, its antihypertensive and anti-inflammatory properties are increasingly recognized.[30] Results from the Finerenone in Reducing Kidney Failure and Disease Progression in Diabetic Kidney Disease (FIDELIO-DKD) trial (n=5734) demonstrated that finerenone reduced CKD progression and cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes and CKD.[31] 

Findings from the FIGARO-DKD trial (n=7437) confirmed cardiovascular benefit, with a 13% reduction in the composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or heart failure hospitalization.[32] Results from the Finerenone Trial to Investigate Efficacy and Safety Superior to Placebo in Patients With Heart Failure (FINEARTS-HF) trial (n=6001) demonstrated benefit in heart failure with ejection fraction greater than or equal to 40%.[33] Finerenone produces a modest blood pressure reduction (2-3 mm Hg in systolic pressure) but with significantly less hyperkalemia than steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. The role in hypertension treatment is primarily adjunctive in patients with concurrent CKD or heart failure.

Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitors: Sacubitril and Valsartan

Sacubitril and valsartan combine the ARB valsartan with sacubitril, a neprilysin inhibitor that increases levels of natriuretic peptides, bradykinin, and adrenomedullin, thereby enhancing vasodilation, natriuresis, and antifibrotic effects.[34] While primarily indicated for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction based on the PARADIGM-HF trial, sacubitril and valsartan have demonstrated superior antihypertensive efficacy compared with ARB monotherapy. Results from hypertension trials demonstrated that sacubitril and valsartan reduced ambulatory systolic blood pressure by approximately 5 mm Hg more than olmesartan and improved left ventricular mass index, central aortic pressure, and pulse wave velocity.[35] Emerging data suggest a benefit in patients with advanced CKD transitioning from ARB monotherapy.[36] The role of angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitors specifically for the treatment of hypertension without heart failure is expanding; however, these agents are not currently recommended as first-line therapy in clinical guidelines.

RNA Interference Therapeutics: Zilebesiran

Zilebesiran represents a paradigm shift in hypertension treatment as the first RNA interference therapeutic targeting angiotensinogen. Administered as a subcutaneous injection every 3 to 6 months, zilebesiran uses small interfering RNA to silence hepatic angiotensinogen messenger RNA production, thereby reducing the substrate for the entire renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system.[37] Results from the phase 2 KARDIA-1 trial demonstrated that zilebesiran 300 mg and 600 mg, administered every 6 months, produced sustained, clinically significant reductions in systolic blood pressure of greater than 15 mm Hg compared with placebo at 3 months in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.[38] Results from the KARDIA-2 trial evaluated zilebesiran 600 mg as an add-on to standard antihypertensive therapy (eg, olmesartan, indapamide, or amlodipine) and demonstrated an additional reduction in blood pressure, with the most pronounced effect when combined with indapamide or amlodipine.[39] 

The principal adverse effects were injection site reactions and mild hyperkalemia. Phase 3 trials are ongoing. The ultra-long duration of action of zilebesiran offers unique advantages for medication adherence, as biannual dosing eliminates the daily pill burden. This may be particularly beneficial for patients with adherence challenges, although the irreversible nature of angiotensinogen suppression raises theoretical concerns about managing intercurrent hypotension or acute illness.

Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors 

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (eg, empagliflozin, dapagliflozin, and canagliflozin) produce consistent systolic blood pressure reductions of 3 to 6 mm Hg through osmotic diuresis, natriuresis, weight reduction, and improvements in endothelial function and arterial stiffness.[40] While these agents are not classified as antihypertensives, their cardiovascular and renal-protective benefits in heart failure (EMPEROR-Reduced and DAPA-HF trials) and CKD (DAPA-CKD and EMPA-KIDNEY trials) make them important adjunctive agents for patients with hypertension and these comorbidities. The 2025 American Diabetes Association and European Society of Cardiology guidelines position sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors early in cardiorenal metabolic algorithms regardless of glycemic status.[41]

Mechanism of Action

Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Get the answers you need instantly with the StatPearls Clinical Decision Support tool. StatPearls spent the last decade developing the largest and most updated Point-of Care resource ever developed. Earn CME/CE by searching and reading articles.
  • Dropdown arrow Search engine and full access to all medical articles
  • Dropdown arrow 10 free questions in your specialty
  • Dropdown arrow Free CME/CE Activities
  • Dropdown arrow Free daily question in your email
  • Dropdown arrow Save favorite articles to your dashboard
  • Dropdown arrow Emails offering discounts

Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care

Mechanism of Action

Thiazide and Thiazide-Like Diuretics

Thiazide diuretics inhibit the electroneutral sodium-chloride cotransporter (NCC), encoded by the SLC12A3 gene, on the apical membrane of the distal convoluted tubule. NCC reabsorbs approximately 5% to 10% of filtered sodium chloride. Structural studies have demonstrated that thiazide molecules (eg, hydrochlorothiazide, chlorthalidone, and indapamide) bind to an orthosteric site within the NCC ion-translocation pathway, competing with chloride for binding and preventing the conformational transition from the outward-facing to the inward-facing state, thereby arresting the transport cycle.[42] 

The blood pressure–lowering mechanism of thiazides is biphasic. In the acute phase (first 4-6 weeks), natriuresis reduces extracellular fluid volume and cardiac output, thereby activating compensatory neurohormonal responses, including the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and the sympathetic nervous system. During chronic therapy (beyond 6-8 weeks), intravascular volume normalizes via reverse autoregulation while blood pressure remains controlled through a sustained reduction in total peripheral vascular resistance.[43] This chronic vasodilatory effect occurs via multiple extrarenal mechanisms: activation of calcium-activated potassium channels in vascular smooth muscle, which increases open-state probability and causes membrane hyperpolarization; inhibition of the Rho/Rho-kinase signaling pathway, which reduces calcium sensitization in vascular smooth muscle cells independently of endothelial function; and possible improvement in endothelial nitric oxide bioavailability.[43][44] These vascular effects are endothelium-independent, as demonstrated by preserved vasodilation in patients with Gitelman syndrome (NCC deficiency).

The pharmacological distinction between true thiazides (benzothiadiazine derivatives, such as hydrochlorothiazide) and thiazide-like agents (phthalimidine derivative chlorthalidone and indoline derivative indapamide) is clinically significant. Chlorthalidone has a substantially longer half-life (40-60 hours vs 6-15 hours for hydrochlorothiazide) because of extensive partitioning into erythrocytes, which serve as a slow-release reservoir, providing more consistent 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure control, particularly during the vulnerable early-morning hours.[5] Indapamide possesses additional direct vasodilatory properties mediated through calcium channel antagonism and prostaglandin-mediated effects, potentially conferring cardiovascular benefit beyond diuresis alone.[45]

Calcium Channel Blockers

Calcium channel blockers exert their effects by inhibiting L-type (long-lasting) voltage-gated calcium channels (Cav1.2), encoded by CACNA1C, which mediate calcium influx during membrane depolarization. The L-type channel is a heteromeric complex comprising α1C (pore-forming), α2δ-, β-, and γ subunits. All calcium channel blockers bind to the α1C  subunit but at distinct receptor sites, which accounts for their differing pharmacological profiles.[11]

Dihydropyridines (eg, amlodipine, nifedipine, felodipine, and lercanidipine) bind preferentially to the inactivated state of the L-type channel in vascular smooth muscle cells, exhibiting voltage-dependent blockade. Because vascular smooth muscle operates at more depolarized membrane potentials than cardiac myocytes, dihydropyridines achieve approximately 100-fold greater selectivity for vascular versus cardiac tissue.[46] The resultant arteriolar vasodilation reduces systemic vascular resistance without significant negative inotropic or chronotropic effects. Amlodipine uniquely possesses a charged, amphiphilic molecular structure that allows it to embed within the lipid bilayer of the cell membrane, creating a membrane depot effect that accounts for its exceptionally long half-life (35-50 hours) and a gradual onset of action, thereby minimizing reflex sympathetic activation.[46] 

Nondihydropyridines bind preferentially to the activated state of the L-type channel in cardiac tissue, producing frequency-dependent blockade. Verapamil (phenylalkylamine) binds to the channel's inner pore from the intracellular side, producing potent negative inotropic, chronotropic, and dromotropic effects. Diltiazem (benzothiazepine) binds to a distinct site that overlaps both the dihydropyridine and verapamil binding sites, resulting in intermediate cardiac effects. Both agents suppress sinoatrial node automaticity and slow atrioventricular conduction by reducing calcium-dependent phase 0 depolarization in nodal tissue.[11] The negative inotropic effect of nondihydropyridines on ventricular myocardium reduces myocardial oxygen consumption, making them useful in stable angina, but hazardous in systolic heart failure.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors

ACE inhibitors competitively block the zinc metallopeptidase ACE (also designated kininase II or CD143), which catalyzes 2 critical reactions: conversion of the decapeptide angiotensin I to the octapeptide angiotensin II and degradation of bradykinin into inactive metabolites.[47][48] By inhibiting angiotensin II production, ACE inhibitors reduce direct arteriolar and venous vasoconstriction, aldosterone secretion from the adrenal zona glomerulosa, sympathetic nervous system activation, vasopressin secretion, and cardiac and vascular smooth muscle hypertrophy and fibrosis mediated by angiotensin II stimulation of angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor–linked growth factor signaling. 

Additionally, ACE inhibitors reduce constriction of the renal efferent arterioles, thereby lowering intraglomerular pressure and proteinuria.[47][48] Simultaneously, ACE inhibition potentiates bradykinin by preventing its degradation. Accumulated bradykinin stimulates β2 receptors on vascular endothelium, triggering a signaling cascade through phospholipase A2 and phospholipase C that releases nitric oxide, prostacyclin via cyclooxygenase activation, and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor. These mediators produce vasodilation, antiproliferative effects, and fibrinolytic activity.[47][48] 

Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers

ARBs selectively and competitively antagonize the AT1 receptor, a G-protein–coupled receptor that mediates vasoconstriction, aldosterone secretion, sympathetic facilitation, cellular proliferation, oxidative stress, and inflammation.[49] Unlike ACE inhibitors, ARBs do not inhibit kininase II and therefore do not increase bradykinin levels, explaining their lower rates of cough (1%-4% versus 5%-20%) and angioedema. However, this difference also means that ARBs lack bradykinin-mediated effects on endothelial function, fibrinolysis, and nitric oxide release.

Circulating angiotensin II levels increase during ARB therapy (due to loss of AT1-mediated negative feedback on renin release), which stimulates the unblocked angiotensin II type 2 (AT2) receptor. AT2 receptor activation produces vasodilation (via nitric oxide and cyclic guanosine monophosphate [GMP] pathways), antiproliferative effects, and natriuresis, potentially contributing to the therapeutic benefit of ARBs.[49]

Individual ARBs differ in their pharmacokinetic properties, which influence clinical selection. Telmisartan has the longest half-life (approximately 24 hours) and highest lipophilicity among agents in this class, providing consistent 24-hour blood pressure control and superior tissue penetration. Telmisartan also acts as a partial agonist of peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor γ, which confers insulin-sensitizing effects.[15] Losartan is distinguished by its uricosuric effect, which reduces serum uric acid by 15% to 30% by inhibiting the URAT1 urate transporter in the proximal tubule, which may be beneficial in patients with concomitant hyperuricemia or gout.[50]

β-Adrenergic Receptor Blockers

β-Blockers exert their antihypertensive effects by antagonizing the binding of catecholamines (epinephrine and norepinephrine) to β-adrenergic receptors. Three β-receptor subtypes are pharmacologically relevant: β1 receptors (located predominantly in cardiac myocytes, the sinoatrial and atrioventricular nodes, and juxtaglomerular cells); β2 receptors (found in bronchial and vascular smooth muscle, hepatocytes, and pancreatic β cells); and β3 receptors (which are expressed in adipose tissue, myocardium, and vascular endothelium).[51] 

β-Blockers reduce blood pressure through multiple mechanisms: (i) decreased heart rate and myocardial contractility (negative chronotropy and inotropy via β1 blockade), reducing cardiac output by 15% to 20%; (ii) suppression of renin release from juxtaglomerular cells (β1-mediated), leading to decreased circulating angiotensin II and aldosterone; (iii) reduction of central sympathetic outflow from the vasomotor center, particularly lipophilic agents that cross the blood-brain barrier, such as propranolol, metoprolol, carvedilol; and (iv) presynaptic β2 receptor blockade, reducing norepinephrine release from sympathetic nerve terminals.[51][52]

β-Blockers are classified by selectivity and ancillary properties. First-generation nonselective agents (eg, propranolol, nadolol, and timolol) block both β1- and β2 receptors equally. Second-generation cardioselective agents (eg, metoprolol, bisoprolol, atenolol, and betaxolol) preferentially block β1 receptors at therapeutic doses, although selectivity is relative and dose-dependent. Third-generation vasodilating β-blockers provide additional blood pressure reduction through distinct vasodilatory mechanisms: carvedilol produces concurrent α1 adrenergic receptor blockade and exhibits antioxidant properties through direct free-radical scavenging; nebivolol stimulates endothelial nitric oxide synthase via β3 receptor agonism. Labetalol combines nonselective β-blockade with αadrenergic blockade in an approximately β-to-α ratio of 3:1 intravenously and 7:1 orally.[52]

Loop Diuretics

Loop diuretics inhibit the sodium-potassium-2 chloride cotransporter (NKCC2), which is encoded by the SLC12A1 gene, on the luminal membrane of the thick ascending limb of the loop of Henle, which normally reabsorbs approximately 25% to 30% of filtered sodium. By blocking NKCC2, loop diuretics abolish the lumen-positive transepithelial voltage generated by potassium recycling, which drives paracellular reabsorption of calcium and magnesium. This mechanism accounts for the calciuric and magnesiuric effects of loop diuretics, in contrast to the hypocalciuric effect of thiazides.[21] Loop diuretics also reduce the medullary osmotic gradient by impairing countercurrent multiplication, thereby decreasing the ability to concentrate urine and free-water reabsorption.

Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists

Steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (eg, spironolactone and eplerenone) competitively bind the mineralocorticoid receptor in the principal cells of the cortical collecting duct. By blocking aldosterone binding, these agents inhibit the epithelial sodium channel and the sodium-potassium ATPase, thereby decreasing sodium reabsorption and reducing potassium and hydrogen ion excretion.[53] Beyond renal epithelial effects, mineralocorticoid receptor activation in the cardiovascular system drives cardiac fibrosis, vascular inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and oxidative stress. Results from the Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study (RALES) demonstrated that spironolactone reduced mortality by 30% in severe heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, and results from the Eplerenone Post-Acute Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure Efficacy and Survival Study (EPHESUS) demonstrated reduced mortality in post–myocardial infarction patients with left ventricular dysfunction, establishing mineralocorticoid receptor blockade as a therapeutic target beyond diuresis.[53]

Spironolactone is nonselective and binds progesterone and androgen receptors, which can cause gynecomastia, breast tenderness, menstrual irregularities, and sexual dysfunction. Eplerenone has greater receptor selectivity, which reduces these adverse effects but requires higher dosing. Finerenone, a nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, induces distinct receptor conformational changes that favor anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic gene expression and demonstrate a more balanced distribution across cardiac and renal tissues.[30]

Hydralazine

Hydralazine is a direct arteriolar vasodilator that reduces peripheral vascular resistance through multiple mechanisms, including inhibition of inositol trisphosphate–mediated calcium release, opening of potassium channels, interference with intracellular calcium mobilization, and possible stimulation of endothelial nitric oxide production. The selective arteriolar vasodilation reduces afterload without affecting preload, which triggers baroreceptor-mediated reflex tachycardia, sympathetic activation, and activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, with secondary sodium and water retention.[54]

Central α2 Agonists

Clonidine and guanfacine are imidazoline-derivative agonists that stimulate α2 adrenergic receptors and imidazoline I1 receptors in the rostral ventrolateral medulla, the primary brainstem center responsible for controlling sympathetic outflow. Activation of these receptors reduces excitatory signaling to preganglionic sympathetic neurons, decreasing systemic norepinephrine release, heart rate, and peripheral vascular resistance. Clonidine also stimulates presynaptic α2 autoreceptors on peripheral sympathetic nerve terminals, further reducing norepinephrine release.[55]

Minoxidil

Minoxidil is a prodrug that is sulfated in the liver by sulfotransferase enzyme SULT1A1 to its active metabolite—minoxidil sulfate. This metabolite activates ATP-sensitive potassium channels in vascular smooth muscle cells, thereby hyperpolarizing the membrane, closing voltage-dependent calcium channels, and causing profound arteriolar vasodilation. The resulting decrease in systemic vascular resistance triggers reflex sympathetic activation, activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, and renal sodium retention, necessitating concurrent β-blocker and loop diuretic therapy.[55]

α1 Adrenergic Receptor Blockers

α1 Blockers (eg, doxazosin, prazosin, and terazosin) competitively antagonize postsynaptic α1 adrenergic receptors (α1A, α1B, and α1D subtypes) on vascular smooth muscle. Blockade causes arteriolar and venous dilation, reducing both afterload and preload.[24]

Emerging Agent Mechanisms

Aprocitentan: Aprocitentan is a dual endothelin receptor antagonist that blocks both ETA receptors, located on vascular smooth muscle and responsible for mediating vasoconstriction, cellular proliferation, and fibrosis, and ETB receptors, located on endothelial cells and involved in nitric oxide and prostacyclin release, as well as on vascular smooth muscle, where they contribute to vasoconstriction. Dual receptor blockade provides more complete suppression of endothelin-1 signaling than selective ETA antagonism, although ETB blockade may reduce endothelin clearance and impair nitric oxide–mediated vasodilation. The overall effect is potent vasodilation, reduced vascular remodeling, and decreased sodium reabsorption through inhibition of endothelin-1–mediated epithelial sodium channel activation in the collecting duct.[25]

Baxdrostat: Baxdrostat selectively inhibits aldosterone synthase (CYP11B2), a cytochrome P450 enzyme, which is responsible for catalyzing the final 3 steps of aldosterone biosynthesis in the adrenal zona glomerulosa: 11β-hydroxylation, 18-hydroxylation, and 18-oxidation of 11-deoxycorticosterone to aldosterone. Baxdrostat demonstrates greater than 100-fold selectivity for CYP11B2 over CYP11B1, thereby reducing aldosterone production without significantly affecting cortisol, corticosterone, or adrenal androgen synthesis. This selectivity has been supported by normal cosyntropin stimulation test results observed in clinical trials.[26]

Zilebesiran: Zilebesiran uses N-acetylgalactosamine–conjugated small interfering RNA technology to enable hepatocyte-specific uptake through the asialoglycoprotein receptor. Following internalization, the small interfering RNA guide strand is incorporated into the RNA-induced silencing complex, where it directs cleavage of angiotensinogen messenger RNA. This process depletes hepatic angiotensinogen stores and suppresses activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system cascade.[37]

Administration

Thiazide and Thiazide-Like Diuretics

All thiazide-type diuretics are administered orally once daily, preferably in the morning to minimize nocturia, although the MAPEC and HYGIA trials suggested potential benefit of nighttime dosing for nondipping patterns. Findings from the Treatment in Morning Versus Evening (TIME) trial subsequently questioned this benefit, showing no significant difference in outcomes between morning and evening dosing.[56] 

Hydrochlorothiazide: Hydrochlorothiazide is typically initiated at 12.5 mg daily and may be titrated to 25 to 50 mg daily. The drug has a bioavailability of 65% to 75%, a half-life of 6 to 15 hours, an onset of action of approximately 2 hours, a peak effect within 4 to 6 hours, and a duration of action of 6 to 12 hours.

Chlorthalidone: Chlorthalidone is typically initiated at 12.5 mg daily and may be titrated to 25 to 50 mg daily, although doses up to 100 mg are rarely used. The drug has a bioavailability of 64% and a prolonged half-life of 40 to 60 hours due to extensive erythrocyte partitioning and binding to carbonic anhydrase, which creates a slow-release reservoir. The onset of action occurs within 2 to 3 hours, the peak effect is attained within 2 to 6 hours, and the duration of action ranges from 48 to 72 hours.

Indapamide: Indapamide is typically administered at a dosage of 1.25 to 2.5 mg daily. The drug has a bioavailability of 93%, a half-life of 14 to 18 hours, and undergoes extensive hepatic metabolism primarily through CYP3A4.[45]

Chlorthalidone and hydrochlorothiazide are not equipotent at equivalent milligram doses. Pharmacokinetic modeling suggests that chlorthalidone 12.5 mg provides approximately equivalent 24-hour natriuresis to hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg.

Calcium Channel Blockers

Amlodipine: Amlodipine is administered at a dosage of 2.5 to 10 mg once daily. The drug has a bioavailability of 64% to 90% and a prolonged half-life of 35 to 50 hours, allowing true once-daily dosing with minimal peak-to-trough variation. Amlodipine undergoes extensive hepatic metabolism via CYP3A4 to inactive metabolites and does not produce clinically significant active metabolites. The medication may be taken without regard to food. Therapy is typically initiated at 5 mg daily (or at 2.5 mg daily in older adults or patients with hepatic impairment). Steady-state concentrations are generally achieved within 7 to 8 days.

Nifedipine extended-release: Nifedipine extended-release is administered at a dosage of 30 to 120 mg once daily and uses a gastrointestinal therapeutic system osmotic push-pull delivery mechanism. The drug has a bioavailability of 84% to 89% and a half-life of approximately 7 hours, which is extended to 12 to 24 hours with the extended-release formulation. Nifedipine is metabolized primarily through CYP3A4 and is a substrate of this enzyme system.

Felodipine extended-release: Felodipine extended-release is administered at a dosage of 2.5 to 10 mg once daily and demonstrates a high vascular selectivity ratio (100:1 vascular-to-cardiac selectivity ratio).[46]

Diltiazem extended-release: Diltiazem extended-release is administered at a dosage of 120 to 480 mg once daily, although dosing frequency may vary depending on the formulation. The drug has a bioavailability of 40% to 67% due to extensive first-pass hepatic metabolism and a parent-compound half-life of 3 to 8 hours, which is prolonged with extended-release formulations. Intravenous diltiazem may be administered as a 0.25 mg/kg bolus over 2 minutes for acute ventricular rate control in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Verapamil extended-release: Verapamil extended-release is administered at a dosage of 120 to 480 mg once daily. The drug has a bioavailability of 20% to 35% due to an extensive first-pass effect and a half-life of 6 to 8 hours. Intravenous verapamil may be administered as a 2.5 to 5 mg bolus for the acute management of supraventricular tachycardia.[46]

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors

Most ACE inhibitors are administered as prodrugs (except captopril and lisinopril) and require hepatic esterase–mediated hydrolysis to their active diacid forms. This requirement has implications in hepatic impairment, where activation may be delayed.

Lisinopril: Lisinopril is administered at a dosage of 10 to 40 mg once daily. This is unique among ACE inhibitors because it is hydrophilic, does not undergo hepatic metabolism, and is excreted entirely by the kidneys. Lisinopril has a bioavailability of approximately 25% and a half-life of about 12 hours.

Ramipril: Ramipril is administered at a dosage of 2.5 to 20 mg daily, given once or twice daily. This is a prodrug that is converted to the active metabolite ramiprilat and demonstrates high affinity for tissue ACE. Ramiprilat has a half-life of 13 to 17 hours. Clinical benefit has been supported by the outcomes of the HOPE trial.[12] 

Enalapril: Enalapril is administered at a dosage of 5 to 40 mg daily, given once or twice daily. This is a prodrug that is converted to the active metabolite enalaprilat. Enalaprilat is the only ACE inhibitor available for parenteral administration and may be administered intravenously at a dosage of 1.25 mg every 6 hours for hypertensive emergencies.

Perindopril: Perindopril is administered at a dosage of 4 to 16 mg once daily. This is a prodrug that is converted to perindoprilat and demonstrates high affinity for tissue ACE. Cardiovascular benefit has been supported by findings from the EUROPA trial. Most ACE inhibitors require dose reduction in patients with renal impairment (except fosinopril, which undergoes dual hepatic and renal elimination).[48]

Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers

All ARBs are administered orally.

Losartan: Losartan is administered at a dosage of 50 to 100 mg once daily. The drug is metabolized to the active metabolite EXP-3174, which is 10 to 40 times more potent at the AT1 receptor and has a half-life of 6 to 9 hours. Losartan is unique among ARBs in possessing a clinically significant uricosuric effect.

Valsartan: Valsartan is administered at a dosage of 80 to 320 mg once daily. The drug does not produce active metabolites, has a bioavailability of approximately 23%, and a half-life of about 6 hours. Valsartan is available in single-pill combinations with hydrochlorothiazide or amlodipine at doses of 160 and 320 mg, and is also available in combination with sacubitril as Sacubitril/valsartan (Entresto).

Telmisartan: Telmisartan is administered at a dosage of 20 to 80 mg once daily. The drug has the longest half-life among ARBs (24 hours) and demonstrates the greatest lipophilicity and volume of distribution within the class. Telmisartan also exhibits partial agonist activity at peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor γ. The drug is eliminated primarily through hepatic pathways and does not require dose adjustment in renal impairment. Among ARBs, telmisartan provides one of the most consistent trough-to-peak blood pressure control ratios.

Olmesartan: Olmesartan is administered at a dosage of 20 to 40 mg once daily and has been associated with rare cases of sprue-like enteropathy, which is characterized by severe, chronic diarrhea and villous atrophy.

Azilsartan medoxomil: Azilsartan medoxomil is administered at a dosage of 40 to 80 mg once daily and has the highest binding affinity for the AT1 receptor among ARBs. Results from head-to-head clinical trials have shown greater reductions in blood pressure with azilsartan medoxomil than with olmesartan and valsartan.[49]

β-Blockers

β-Blockers exhibit considerable variability in pharmacokinetic properties across individual agents within the class.

Metoprolol tartrate: Metoprolol tartrate is administered at a dosage of 50 to 200 mg twice daily (immediate-release formulation). Individuals who are poor CYP2D6 metabolizers, estimated to comprise approximately 7% to 10% of White populations, may experience exaggerated effects. Metoprolol succinate extended-release is administered at a dosage of 25 to 200 mg once daily and utilizes zero-order release kinetics.

Bisoprolol: Bisoprolol is administered at a dosage of 2.5 to 10 mg once daily and demonstrates high β1 selectivity among β-blockers. The drug undergoes approximately 50% hepatic and 50% renal elimination, with a half-life of 10 to 12 hours.

Atenolol: Atenolol is administered at a dosage of 25 to 100 mg once daily. The drug is hydrophilic, undergoes renal excretion, and has a half-life of 6 to 7 hours, which may result in less consistent 24-hour blood pressure control. Atenolol is no longer recommended by most current guidelines.

Carvedilol: Carvedilol is administered at a dosage of 6.25 to 25 mg twice daily in the immediate-release formulation or 10 to 80 mg once daily in the controlled-release formulation. In addition to nonselective β-blockade, carvedilol also exerts α1-adrenergic receptor blockade.

Nebivolol: Nebivolol is administered at a dosage of 5 to 40 mg once daily. The drug demonstrates high β1 selectivity at lower doses and promotes vasodilation through stimulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase mediated by β3 receptor agonism.

Labetalol: Labetalol is administered orally at a dosage of 200 to 1200 mg twice daily. For hypertensive emergencies, it may be administered intravenously as a 20 mg bolus, which may be repeated or followed by a continuous infusion at 0.5 to 2 mg/min. Labetalol is a preferred agent for the management of hypertension during pregnancy.[51][52]

Loop Diuretics

Furosemide: Furosemide is administered at a dosage of 20 to 80 mg once or twice daily, with doses up to 600 mg/d used in advanced CKD or heart failure. The drug demonstrates highly variable oral bioavailability, ranging from 10% to 100% (average approximately 50%), and has a half-life of 1 to 2 hours. Oral absorption may be erratic and is often further impaired by gut edema in patients with decompensated heart failure. The approximate intravenous-to-oral dose conversion ratio is 1:2.

Bumetanide: Bumetanide is administered at a dosage of 0.5 to 2 mg once or twice daily and demonstrates more predictable oral bioavailability of approximately 80% to 100%. The equipotent dose ratio of the drug relative to furosemide is approximately 1:40.

Torsemide: Torsemide is administered at a dosage of 5 to 20 mg once daily for hypertension, with doses up to 200 mg used in patients with heart failure or CKD. The drug has an oral bioavailability of 80% to 100% and a half-life of 3 to 4 hours. In addition to loop diuretic activity, torsemide inhibits aldosterone receptor binding and is associated with less potassium wasting than furosemide. A dose of 20 mg torsemide is approximately equivalent to 40 to 80 mg furosemide.[21]

Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists

Spironolactone: Spironolactone is administered at a dosage of 25 to 50 mg once daily for hypertension, with doses up to 100 mg used in selected patients. The drug has a bioavailability greater than 90%, which is enhanced when taken with food, and undergoes extensive hepatic metabolism to multiple active metabolites, primarily canrenone, which has a half-life of 16 to 22 hours. The antihypertensive effect develops gradually over 2 to 4 weeks. The incidence of gynecomastia increases with higher doses and longer duration of therapy.

Eplerenone: Eplerenone is administered at a dosage of 50 mg once or twice daily. The drug has a bioavailability of approximately 69%, is metabolized via the CYP3A4 substrate, and should not be coadministered with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors. Eplerenone has a half-life of 4 to 6 hours, demonstrates approximately 500-fold greater selectivity for the mineralocorticoid receptor than spironolactone, and does not produce active metabolites.

Finerenone: Finerenone is administered at a dosage of 10 to 20 mg once daily. The drug is a CYP3A4 substrate, has a half-life of 2 to 3 hours, and demonstrates a rapid onset of action. Unlike spironolactone, which preferentially concentrates in renal tissue, finerenone demonstrates a more balanced distribution between cardiac and renal tissues.[30][31]

Hydralazine

Hydralazine can be administered orally or parenterally.

Oral dosing: Oral therapy is typically initiated at 10 mg 4 times daily for the first 2 to 4 days, followed by 25 mg 4 times daily during the first week, and then increased to 50 mg 4 times daily thereafter. The maximum recommended dosage is 300 mg/d; however, doses greater than 200 mg/d are associated with a substantially increased risk of drug-induced lupus erythematosus.[54]

The frequent dosing requirement (3-4 times daily) because of its short half-life (2-4 hours for the parent compound and 7-16 hours for active hydrazine metabolites) limits adherence. Oral bioavailability is highly variable (10% to 26% in fast acetylators and 40% to 55% in slow acetylators) owing to extensive first-pass hepatic metabolism via N-acetyltransferase-2 polymorphism. Slow acetylators achieve higher plasma concentrations and face a significantly greater risk of drug-induced lupus erythematosus; acetylator phenotype should be considered when escalating to doses above 200 mg/d.[54]

Parenteral administration: Parenteral hydralazine may be administered intravenously or intramuscularly at a dosage of 5 to 10 mg every 20 to 30 minutes, with a maximum of 20 mg intravenously or 40 mg intramuscularly per treatment episode. This drug is commonly used for hypertensive emergencies, particularly in patients with eclampsia or preeclampsia, in whom it remains a first-line agent. The onset of action occurs within 5 to 20 minutes after intravenous administration and within 10 to 30 minutes after intramuscular administration. Food increases the oral bioavailability of hydralazine. Hydralazine is typically administered in combination with a β-blocker and a diuretic to counteract reflex tachycardia and fluid retention.[54]

Central α2 Agonists

Clonidine is available in oral (immediate-release tablets), transdermal patch, and injectable formulations.

Oral clonidine: Oral clonidine is typically initiated at 0.1 mg twice daily and may be titrated in increments of 0.1 mg/d at weekly intervals. The usual maintenance dosage ranges from 0.2 to 0.6 mg/d in divided doses administered twice to 3 times daily, with a maximum dosage of 2.4 mg/d. Clonidine has a bioavailability of 75% to 100% and a half-life of 6 to 20 hours (mean approximately 12 hours), which is prolonged in patients with renal impairment. Approximately 50% of the drug is excreted unchanged in the urine; therefore, dose adjustment is required in severe Chronic Kidney Disease with an eGFR less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m².[55]

Transdermal clonidine (Catapres-TTS): Transdermal clonidine (Catapres-TTS) is available as patches that deliver 0.1, 0.2, or 0.3 mg/d over 7 days. The patch is applied to a hairless area of the upper outer arm or anterior chest, with weekly rotation of application sites. Therapeutic plasma concentrations are typically achieved within 2 to 3 days after initial application. Compared with oral formulations, transdermal clonidine provides more stable plasma concentrations, avoids first-pass metabolism, improves adherence through once-weekly administration, and substantially reduces the incidence of dry mouth and sedation. When central α2 agonist therapy is indicated, the transdermal formulation is generally preferred.[55]

Minoxidil

Minoxidil is administered orally.

Initial dose: Minoxidil is typically initiated at 5 mg once daily, although a lower starting dose of 2.5 mg once daily may be used in older adults or in patients receiving concurrent diuretic therapy. Dosage may be titrated in increments of 5 to 10 mg at intervals of at least 3 days.

Usual maintenance: The usual maintenance dosage of minoxidil is 10 to 40 mg/d administered in 1 or 2 divided doses, with a maximum dosage of 100 mg/d. Minoxidil has a bioavailability of approximately 90%. Although the parent compound has a half-life of 3 to 4 hours, the active metabolite, minoxidil sulfate, which is produced through hepatic sulfation by SULT1A1, has a duration of action of approximately 24 hours, allowing once- or twice-daily dosing. Peak antihypertensive effect generally occurs 2 to 3 hours after oral administration.[23]

αAdrenergic Receptor Blockers

Doxazosin: Doxazosin is typically initiated at 1 mg once daily at bedtime to minimize the risk of first-dose syncope. The dosage may be titrated gradually at 1- to 2-week intervals to 2 to 8 mg daily, with a maximum dosage of 16 mg/d. Doxazosin has a bioavailability of approximately 65% and a half-life of 15 to 22 hours, allowing once-daily administration. Extended-release doxazosin (Cardura XL) administered at 4 to 8 mg daily provides more stable plasma concentrations.

Prazosin: Prazosin is typically initiated at 0.5 mg administered twice or 3 times daily, as the risk of the first-dose phenomenon is greatest with this agent. The usual maintenance dosage ranges from 2 to 20 mg/d in 2 to 3 divided doses, with a maximum dosage of 40 mg/d. Prazosin has a half-life of 2 to 3 hours, necessitating multiple daily doses.

Terazosin: Terazosin is typically initiated at 1 mg at bedtime and may be titrated to 1 to 20 mg/d administered in 1 or 2 divided doses. The drug has a half-life of 8 to 13 hours.[24]

Newer Agents

Aprocitentan: Aprocitentan is administered orally at a dosage of 12.5 mg once daily and is available exclusively through the Tryvio Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) program. The drug has a half-life of approximately 44 hours, undergoes hepatic metabolism, and does not require dose adjustment in patients with renal impairment. Pregnancy testing is required before treatment initiation and monthly during therapy, and reliable contraception is mandatory during treatment.[25]

Zilebesiran: Zilebesiran is administered as a subcutaneous injection at doses of 300 to 600 mg every 3 or 6 months. Blood pressure reduction typically begins within 2 to 4 weeks, with maximal effect observed at 8 weeks. The duration of effect is approximately 24 weeks with the 300 mg dose and greater than 24 weeks with the 600 mg dose. Its antihypertensive effect is not rapidly reversible because the recovery of angiotensinogen levels depends on new hepatic protein synthesis over a period of weeks to months. Zilebesiran is administered in healthcare settings and requires cold-chain storage.[38]

Adverse Effects

Thiazide and Thiazide-Like Diuretics

Metabolic effects are dose-related and represent the primary limitation of thiazide therapy. Hypokalemia (most common, occurring in 10% to 40% at higher doses) results from increased sodium delivery to the collecting duct, stimulating epithelial sodium channel–mediated sodium reabsorption coupled with potassium secretion via renal outer medullary potassium channels, and is compounded by secondary hyperaldosteronism due to volume depletion. Hypokalemia increases the risk of ventricular arrhythmias, particularly in patients receiving digoxin or with prolonged QTc intervals. Chlorthalidone produces more hypokalemia than hydrochlorothiazide at equipotent doses (6.0% vs 4.4% in the Diuretic Comparison Project).[6] Hyponatremia, which occurs more commonly in older women and individuals with low body mass, can be severe and life-threatening and results from impaired free-water excretion in the diluting segment of the nephron. Hyperuricemia, caused by competition for the organic anion transporters OAT1 and OAT3 in the proximal tubule, may precipitate gout. Hypercalcemia is typically mild and occurs through enhanced proximal reabsorption secondary to volume depletion. Impaired glucose tolerance results from hypokalemia-induced impairment of pancreatic β-cell insulin secretion and decreased peripheral insulin sensitivity. Dyslipidemia, characterized by a transient increase in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides, usually resolves within 1 year. Photosensitivity dermatitis occurs rarely.[42]

Calcium Channel Blockers

Dihydropyridine-specific effects include peripheral edema in 5% to 30% of patients (dose-dependent), caused by preferential dilation of arterioles in the precapillary bed, which increases intracapillary hydrostatic pressure and transcapillary fluid filtration (Starling forces). This effect does not represent fluid retention and does not respond to diuretics. Coadministration of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors attenuates edema by inducing postcapillary venodilation and restoring the balance of capillary hydrostatic forces. Headache, flushing, and dizziness result from vasodilation.

Gingival hyperplasia occurs in 3% to 10% of patients (more common with nifedipine) and is caused by impaired collagen degradation by fibroblasts in the gingival tissue. Reflex tachycardia is more common with short-acting formulations. Calcium channel blockers inhibit platelet aggregation by suppressing calcium-dependent thromboxane A2 synthesis and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa activation, thereby increasing the risk of gastrointestinal tract bleeding, particularly in older adults and those receiving concurrent anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy.[46]

Nondihydropyridine–specific effects include bradycardia and atrioventricular conduction delay, particularly hazardous when combined with β-blockers or digoxin. Constipation occurs in up to 25% of patients receiving verapamil because of calcium channel blockade in gastrointestinal smooth muscle, which requires proactive treatment. Negative inotropy can precipitate or worsen heart failure in patients with reduced systolic function. Both subclasses inhibit CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein, causing clinically significant drug interactions with statins (including an increased risk of rhabdomyolysis with simvastatin doses >20 mg), calcineurin inhibitors (eg, cyclosporine and tacrolimus), and digoxin (verapamil increases digoxin levels by approximately 60% to 80%).[11][46]

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors

Cough occurs in 5% to 20% of patients (higher in women, Asian patients, and nonsmokers) and is caused by the accumulation of bradykinin, substance P, and prostaglandins in the bronchial epithelium, which sensitizes the cough reflex via C-fiber stimulation. Onset is typically 1 to 6 months after initiation, and resolution requires 1 to 4 weeks after discontinuation. Substitution with an ARB is appropriate because cross-reactivity is rare (<3%).[47]

Angioedema occurs in 0.1% to 0.7% of patients (with a 4-fold higher risk in Black patients) due to bradykinin-mediated increases in vascular permeability in the submucosa. This condition typically involves the face, lips, tongue, and larynx, with potential airway compromise that may require emergent intervention, including epinephrine, airway management, and consideration of icatibant or a C1-esterase inhibitor concentrate in severe cases. Risk persists throughout therapy (median onset 1-2 years). ACE inhibitor–related angioedema is an absolute contraindication to rechallenge and a strong relative contraindication to ARB use, although cross-reactivity is less than 2%.[47][48]

Hyperkalemia occurs particularly when combined with potassium-sparing diuretics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, potassium supplements, trimethoprim, or heparin, and in patients with CKD (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m²), diabetes mellitus, or heart failure. Acute kidney injury occurs through reduction of efferent arteriolar tone, which decreases intraglomerular pressure; a rise in serum creatinine of up to 30% is expected, but a rise greater than 30% should prompt evaluation for bilateral renal artery stenosis or volume depletion. First-dose hypotension is more common in patients who are volume-depleted or receiving high-dose diuretics. ACE inhibitors are teratogenic and can cause fetal renal tubular dysplasia, oligohydramnios, pulmonary hypoplasia, and skeletal malformations. Consequently, these agents are contraindicated in all trimesters throughout pregnancy.[47][48]

Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers

ARBs share the class effects of hyperkalemia, hypotension, and renal impairment with ACE inhibitors but have substantially lower rates of cough (1% to 4%, comparable to placebo) and angioedema (<0.1%). The teratogenicity risk is identical to that of ACE inhibitors. Dizziness and fatigue are the most commonly reported adverse effects. Rare hepatotoxicity has been reported, predominantly with losartan and irbesartan. Olmesartan has been uniquely associated with a sprue-like enteropathy characterized by severe chronic diarrhea, weight loss, and villous atrophy on duodenal biopsy, which resolves upon drug discontinuation. The mechanism is believed to involve cell-mediated immune injury to the intestinal mucosa.[49]

β-Blockers

Cardiovascular: Bradycardia, atrioventricular conduction delay, hypotension, and the precipitation of acute decompensated heart failure when initiated at high doses in patients with reduced systolic function, necessitating low-dose initiation and gradual titration. Cold extremities and worsening of Raynaud phenomenon occur because of unopposed alpha-mediated vasoconstriction.

Metabolic: Weight gain (average 1.2 kg), impaired glucose tolerance, and unfavorable lipid effects, including increased triglycerides and decreased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Carvedilol and nebivolol demonstrate more favorable metabolic profiles due to their vasodilatory properties and enhanced insulin sensitivity.[51][52]

Central nervous system: Fatigue, exercise intolerance, depression, vivid dreams, and sleep disturbances, which are more common with lipophilic agents that cross the blood-brain barrier. Respiratory adverse effects include bronchospasm, particularly with nonselective agents, which may unmask or worsen asthma; however, cardioselective agents can be used cautiously in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Sexual dysfunction occurs in approximately 5% to 15% of patients. Abrupt discontinuation can precipitate rebound hypertension, tachycardia, angina exacerbation, and rarely myocardial infarction because of upregulated β-receptor density and catecholamine supersensitivity. Gradual dose tapering over 1 to 2 weeks is therefore recommended.[51]

Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists

Hyperkalemia is the most clinically significant class-wide adverse effect, resulting from blockade of aldosterone-mediated potassium secretion in principal cells of the cortical collecting duct. Risk factors include concurrent blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, CKD (eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m²), diabetes mellitus, potassium supplements, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and trimethoprim. Spironolactone-specific adverse effects reflect its nonselectivity for the mineralocorticoid receptor, including gynecomastia, breast tenderness, erectile dysfunction, decreased libido in men, and menstrual irregularities in premenopausal women. These effects are dose- and duration-dependent and often prompt discontinuation or switching to eplerenone or finerenone.[20][30][53]

Eplerenone is highly selective for the mineralocorticoid receptor and largely avoids antiandrogenic and progestational adverse effects. Gynecomastia rates with eplerenone are comparable to placebo. However, hyperkalemia remains the principal risk. Findings from the Eplerenone Post-Acute Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure Efficacy and Survival Study (EPHESUS) demonstrated that serious hyperkalemia (potassium ≥6.0 mEq/L) occurred in 5.5% of eplerenone-treated patients versus 3.9% of patients receiving placebo. Risk is amplified by concurrent use of an ACE inhibitor or ARB and CKD. Eplerenone can also cause dizziness, diarrhea, and, rarely, elevated hepatic transaminases. Drug interactions via CYP3A4 inhibition are clinically important because strong inhibitors are contraindicated and moderate inhibitors require dose adjustment.[53]

Finerenone demonstrates an improved adverse effect profile compared with steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. Results from the Finerenone in Reducing Kidney Failure and Disease Progression in Diabetic Kidney Disease (FIDELIO-DKD) and Finerenone in Reducing Cardiovascular Mortality and Morbidity in Diabetic Kidney Disease (FIGARO-DKD) trials demonstrated that hyperkalemia leading to discontinuation occurred in 2.3% of finerenone-treated patients versus 0.9% of patients receiving placebo. Finerenone did not cause gynecomastia, breast pain, or antiandrogenic effects. The most common adverse event was hyperkalemia, which was generally manageable with dose adjustment and rarely required hospitalization. No cases of acute renal failure attributable to finerenone were reported. Results from the Finerenone Trial to Investigate Efficacy and Safety Superior to Placebo in Patients With Heart Failure (FINEARTS-HF) demonstrated similar safety findings, with modest rates of hyperkalemia and no excess renal adverse events.[32][33]

Hydralazine

The most clinically significant adverse effect is drug-induced lupus erythematosus, occurring in 5% to 10% of patients receiving doses greater than 200 mg/d and up to 20% at higher doses, predominantly in slow acetylators. Drug-induced lupus erythematosus presents with arthralgias, myalgias, fever, pleuritis, pericarditis, and positive antihistone antibodies. Symptoms usually resolve within weeks of drug discontinuation, though serological abnormalities may persist for months. Renal and central nervous system involvement are rare compared with idiopathic systemic lupus erythematosus.[54]

Reflex sympathetic activation causes tachycardia, palpitations, and increased cardiac output, which can provoke angina or myocardial ischemia in patients with underlying coronary artery disease. This effect necessitates concurrent β-blocker therapy. Fluid retention and edema from renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activation and direct renal sodium retention necessitate concurrent diuretic use. Other adverse effects include headache, flushing, nasal congestion, nausea, diarrhea, and peripheral neuropathy.[54]

Central α2 Agonists

Central nervous system depression is the predominant adverse effect. Sedation and drowsiness occur in 35% to 50% of patients (often decreases with continued use), dry mouth in 25% to 40% (reduced salivary gland secretion via α2 stimulation), and dizziness in 15% to 20%. Other central nervous system effects include depression, vivid dreams or nightmares, cognitive impairment (particularly in older adults), and sexual dysfunction (erectile dysfunction in 10% to 20% of men, decreased libido).[55] Rebound hypertensive crisis is the most dangerous adverse effect and occurs with abrupt discontinuation, particularly with oral clonidine at doses greater than 0.6 mg/d or after more than 1 month of therapy. The mechanism involves upregulation of peripheral α-adrenergic receptors during chronic therapy; sudden withdrawal results in catecholamine excess, producing severe hypertension (systolic blood pressure greater than 200 mm Hg), tachycardia, tremor, diaphoresis, and headache that can mimic pheochromocytoma crisis.

Management requires reinstitution of clonidine or treatment with intravenous phentolamine. β-Blockers alone are contraindicated in rebound hypertension because unopposed α-adrenergic vasoconstriction can worsen the crisis. Transdermal clonidine carries a lower risk of rebound because of its gradual offset.[55] Other adverse effects include contact dermatitis with transdermal patches (15% to 20%), bradycardia and atrioventricular conduction delay, constipation, and rare hepatotoxicity with methyldopa. Clonidine should be used cautiously in patients with sinus node dysfunction, depression, or peripheral vascular disease.[55]

Minoxidil

Sodium and water retention are nearly universal (>80% of patients) in the absence of concurrent loop diuretic therapy, resulting from activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and direct renal tubular sodium reabsorption. This can progress to peripheral edema, pulmonary edema, and pericardial effusion. Pericardial effusion occurs in approximately 3% of patients and can rarely progress to cardiac tamponade, which is life-threatening. Routine echocardiographic monitoring is recommended in the first months of therapy.[23]

Reflex tachycardia is pronounced due to potent arteriolar vasodilation, necessitating concurrent β-blocker therapy to prevent myocardial ischemia and increased myocardial oxygen demand. Hypertrichosis occurs in approximately 80% of patients after 3 to 6 weeks of oral therapy and affects the face, arms, back, and legs. This effect is cosmetically distressing, particularly in women, and reverses within 1 to 6 months after drug discontinuation.[23] Furthermore, electrocardiographic changes, including T-wave flattening or inversion and ST-segment changes, occur in up to 60% of patients without evidence of myocardial ischemia and likely reflect altered ventricular repolarization. Other adverse effects include headache, nausea, and rare Stevens-Johnson syndrome.[23]

α1 Adrenergic Receptor Blockers

First-dose syncope and orthostatic hypotension are hallmark adverse effects, resulting from an abrupt reduction in peripheral vascular resistance without adequate compensatory reflex tachycardia. Risk is greatest with prazosin, in volume-depleted patients, and when initiated at higher doses or during the daytime. Initiation at bedtime with the lowest available dose minimizes this risk.[55]

Heart failure: The ALLHAT trial demonstrated a 25% increase in combined cardiovascular events and a 2-fold increase in heart failure incidence with doxazosin compared with chlorthalidone, leading to early termination of the doxazosin arm and removing αblockers from consideration as first-line antihypertensive monotherapy.[55] The mechanism likely involves chronic neurohormonal activation (increased plasma norepinephrine and renin-aldosterone-angiotensin activation) and fluid retention.

Other adverse effects include dizziness (10% to 20%), headache (5% to 15%), fatigue, nasal congestion (α1-mediated vasodilation of the nasal mucosa), retrograde ejaculation (particularly relevant in younger men), and intraoperative floppy iris syndrome during cataract surgery. This syndrome occurs because α1A receptors mediate contraction of the iris dilator muscle; blockade results in poor pupillary dilation, iris billowing, and progressive intraoperative miosis. Ophthalmologists must be informed of any current or prior use of α1 blockers before cataract surgery. Tamsulosin carries the highest risk, but all α1 blockers have been implicated.[55]

Newer Agents

Aprocitentan: Aprocitentan is associated with peripheral edema and fluid retention, occurring in approximately 9% of patients receiving 12.5 mg and 18% of those receiving 25 mg, compared with 2% in placebo-treated patients. These effects are thought to result from combined vasodilation and renal sodium retention. Other adverse effects include anemia, which may be dilutional and may also involve suppression of erythropoietin production, headache, and nasal congestion. Potential hepatotoxicity has been reported, and periodic liver function monitoring is recommended. Aprocitentan is teratogenic (Category X equivalent, Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy required). Unlike bosentan (a first-generation endothelin receptor antagonist), aprocitentan has not demonstrated a significant hepatotoxicity signal in clinical studies; however, long-term safety surveillance remains ongoing.[25]

Baxdrostat: Baxdrostat has demonstrated a favorable safety profile in clinical trials. No evidence of adrenocortical insufficiency has been observed at doses up to 2 mg, with cortisol concentrations remaining within the reference range and showing appropriate responses to cosyntropin stimulation. Mild elevations in serum potassium may occur. Although clinically significant adrenal insufficiency has not been observed, a theoretical risk exists during physiologic stress states, such as acute illness or surgery, warranting ongoing monitoring.[28]

Zilebesiran: Zilebesiran is associated with injection-site reactions, reported in approximately 16.9% of treated patients, and mild hyperkalemia. The prolonged duration and limited reversibility of angiotensinogen suppression raise theoretical concerns regarding the inability to rapidly reverse hypotension during intercurrent illness, surgery, or dehydration. Currently, no specific antidote is available.[38]

Contraindications

Thiazide and Thiazide-Like Diuretics

Absolute contraindications: Anuria, in which no diuretic effect can be achieved, and hypersensitivity to the specific agent. Historical concerns regarding cross-reactivity with sulfonamide antibiotics have been largely debunked. The allergenic sulfonamide moiety in antibiotics (N1-substituted sulfonamide) differs structurally from the nonantibiotic sulfonamide in thiazides, and large observational studies have not confirmed clinically significant cross-reactivity.

Relative contraindications: Symptomatic hyponatremia, severe hypokalemia, refractory gout, pregnancy (because of the risk of neonatal thrombocytopenia and hyponatremia), and an eGFR less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m² (where antihypertensive efficacy may be reduced, although indapamide may retain some effect).[42]

Calcium Channel Blockers

Absolute contraindications for all calcium channel blockers: Hypersensitivity to the drug.

Dihydropyridines: Cardiogenic shock, severe aortic stenosis (risk of syncope from afterload reduction without ability to augment cardiac output), and acute coronary syndrome (short-acting formulations only, due to reflex sympathetic activation).

Nondihydropyridines: Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (left ventricular ejection fraction <40%), second- or third-degree atrioventricular block (without pacemaker), sick sinus syndrome (without pacemaker), and concurrent intravenous β-blocker administration because of the risk of severe bradycardia and asystole.

Relative contraindications: Hepatic impairment, in which extensive first-pass metabolism may increase drug exposure; concomitant use of CYP3A4 inhibitors with verapamil or diltiazem, due to the risk of toxic accumulation; and concurrent digoxin use with verapamil, which may require a 50% reduction in the digoxin dose.[11]

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers

Absolute contraindications (both classes): Pregnancy (all trimesters) because of teratogenic effects, including fetal renal tubular dysgenesis, oligohydramnios, and skeletal malformations; bilateral renal artery stenosis or renal artery stenosis in a solitary functioning kidney because of the risk of acute renal failure resulting from loss of efferent arteriolar tone required to maintain GFR); and concurrent aliskiren use in patients with diabetes mellitus or an eGFR less than 60 mL/min.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-specific contraindications: Prior ACE inhibitor–related angioedema (absolute contraindication) and history of hereditary or idiopathic angioedema (absolute contraindication).

Relative contraindications: Hyperkalemia greater than 5.5 mEq/L, severe volume depletion (which should be corrected before initiating therapy), severe aortic stenosis (because of the risk of hypotension), advanced CKD with an eGFR less than 20 mL/min (requiring careful monitoring with expectation of modest increase in serum creatinine), and women of childbearing potential without reliable contraception.[47][48][49]

β-Blockers

Absolute contraindications: Severe sinus bradycardia (<50 beats/min), second- or third-degree atrioventricular block (without a pacemaker), decompensated heart failure (acute initiation; may be carefully introduced once stabilized and euvolemic), and cardiogenic shock.

Relative contraindications: Severe reactive airway disease (asthma, although cardioselective agents may be used cautiously in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), pheochromocytoma without prior α-blockade (because of the risk of hypertensive crisis from unopposed α-receptor stimulation), insulin-treated diabetes mellitus with recurrent severe hypoglycemia (masking of warning symptoms), severe peripheral arterial disease with critical limb ischemia, and prinzmetal (vasospastic) angina (because of the risk of coronary vasospasm resulting from unopposed α-receptor activation, a risk that is greater with nonselective than with cardioselective.[51]

Loop Diuretics 

Hypersensitivity, severe hepatic encephalopathy, and severe uncontrolled electrolyte depletion.[21]

Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists

Contraindications include serum potassium greater than 5.0 mEq/L at treatment initiation; an eGFR less than 30 mL/min for steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (although finerenone has been studied in patients with an eGFR as low as 25 mL/min/1.73 m²); concurrent use of potassium supplements or strong CYP3A4 inhibitors (finerenone).[20][30][32][33][53]

Hydralazine

Contraindications include mitral valve rheumatic heart disease, in which hydralazine may exacerbate pulmonary hypertension; coronary artery disease in the absence of concurrent β-blocker therapy because reflex tachycardia may provoke ischemia); dissecting aortic aneurysm; and known systemic lupus erythematosus or positive antinuclear antibodies because of an increased risk of drug-induced lupus erythematosus. Hydralazine should be used with caution in patients with renal impairment, with dose reduction considered when creatinine clearance is less than 10 mL/min, and in those with cerebrovascular disease.[54]

Central α2 Agonists

Absolute contraindications: Sick sinus syndrome and second- or third-degree atrioventricular block without a pacemaker.

Relative contraindications: Severe depression, concurrent use with other central nervous system depressants (because of the potential for enhanced sedation), and peripheral vascular disease (which can exacerbate Raynaud phenomenon). Clonidine should not be abruptly discontinued.[55]

Minoxidil

Contraindications include pheochromocytoma (catecholamine surge with reflex activation), pericardial effusion or tamponade, and pulmonary hypertension secondary to mitral stenosis. Minoxidil must be administered in combination with a β-blocker and a loop diuretic; this is an absolute requirement, not optional.[23]

αAntagonists

These are not recommended as monotherapy for hypertension based on evidence from the ALLHAT evidence. These agents should be used cautiously in patients with orthostatic hypotension, hepatic impairment, or concomitant use of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors due to an increased risk of synergistic hypotension.[24]

Monitoring

The 2025 ACC/AHA guideline places home blood pressure monitoring at the center of hypertension management and recommends using validated oscillometric upper-arm devices with cuff sizes appropriately matched to arm circumference.

Protocol: Blood pressure should be measured with the patient seated, feet flat on the floor, back supported, and arm positioned at heart level. After 5 minutes of rest, 2 readings should be obtained at 1-minute intervals in both the morning and evening for at least 3 consecutive days, and preferably for 7 days. Readings obtained on the first day should be discarded, and the remaining measurements averaged.

Home blood pressure monitoring threshold for hypertension: The threshold for diagnosing hypertension using home blood pressure monitoring is an average blood pressure of 130/80 mm Hg or greater. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring remains the reference standard for confirming hypertension, identifying white-coat and masked hypertension, and evaluating nocturnal dipping patterns. Diagnostic thresholds for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring are a 24-hour average of 125/75 mm Hg or greater, a daytime average of 130/80 mm Hg or greater, and a nighttime average of 110/65 mm Hg or greater.[1]

Drug-Specific Monitoring

Thiazide and loop diuretics: A basic metabolic panel, including sodium, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and glucose levels, along with magnesium level, should be obtained at baseline, 2 to 4 weeks after treatment initiation or dosage adjustment, and every 3 to 6 months thereafter. Serum uric acid should be measured at baseline and monitored periodically in patients with a history of gout or hyperuricemia. Serum calcium levels should be monitored in patients receiving thiazide diuretics because hypercalcemia may unmask underlying primary hyperparathyroidism. Patients should also be assessed for signs of volume depletion, including orthostatic vital signs, skin turgor, and mucous membranes, particularly older adults and those experiencing concomitant illness.

Potassium-sparing diuretics and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists: Potassium levels should be measured at baseline, within 1 week of treatment initiation, at 1 month, at 3 months, and every 3 months thereafter. More frequent monitoring is warranted in patients with CKD, diabetes mellitus, or concomitant use of a renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor. Therapy should be withheld if the serum potassium level exceeds 5.5 mEq/L.[21]

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers: Serum creatinine and potassium levels should be measured at baseline, 1 to 2 weeks after treatment initiation or dosage adjustment, and every 3 to 6 months thereafter. An increase in serum creatinine of up to 30% above baseline is generally expected because of reduced intraglomerular pressure and does not warrant discontinuation of therapy. An increase greater than 30% should prompt evaluation for bilateral renal artery stenosis, volume depletion, or concomitant use of nephrotoxic medications. Patients should be monitored for signs and symptoms of angioedema throughout treatment, as the risk may persist for the duration of therapy. Pregnancy testing should be performed before treatment initiation in women of childbearing potential.[47]

Calcium channel blockers: Patients receiving calcium channel blockers should be monitored for peripheral edema, particularly with dihydropyridine agents, as well as for changes in heart rate and electrocardiographic abnormalities with nondihydropyridine agents, especially when used concomitantly with β-blockers or digoxin. Constipation should be assessed in patients receiving verapamil. Periodic liver function testing is recommended for patients receiving diltiazem or verapamil because of hepatic metabolism and the potential for rare hepatotoxicity. Clinicians should also monitor for clinically significant drug interactions involving CYP3A4 substrates.[46]

β-Blockers: Heart rate and blood pressure should be assessed at each visit. The target resting heart rate is generally 55 to 70 beats per minute; dosage reduction or temporary withholding of therapy should be considered if the heart rate falls below 50 beats per minute and is accompanied by symptoms. Blood glucose should be monitored in patients with diabetes mellitus as β-blockers may impair hypoglycemia awareness. Pulmonary function should be evaluated if respiratory symptoms develop. Patients receiving sotalol require QTc interval monitoring due to the risk of QT prolongation; therapy is typically initiated in an inpatient setting with continuous telemetry monitoring for the first 3 days. Periodic liver function testing is recommended for patients receiving labetalol because of the rare risk of hepatocellular injury.[51]

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and finerenone: Potassium levels should be measured at baseline, 4 weeks after treatment initiation or dosage adjustment, and periodically thereafter. Renal function, including eGFR, should also be monitored. Therapy should be discontinued if the serum potassium concentration exceeds 5.5 mEq/L or if the eGFR declines to less than 15 mL/min/1.73 m².[20][30][32][33][53]

Aprocitentan: Pregnancy testing should be performed before treatment initiation and monthly throughout therapy. Hemoglobin and hematocrit levels should be measured at baseline and monitored periodically because of the risk of dilutional anemia. Liver function tests should be obtained at baseline and repeated periodically during treatment. Patients should also be monitored for fluid retention, peripheral edema, and changes in body weight.[25]

Baxdrostat: Morning serum cortisol levels should be measured at baseline and monitored periodically during treatment. Serum potassium concentrations should also be monitored. Assessment of adrenal function, including a cosyntropin stimulation test, should be performed if there is clinical suspicion of adrenal insufficiency.[27]

Zilebesiran: Blood pressure should be assessed at each healthcare visit because of the prolonged dosing interval of 3 to 6 months. Potassium concentrations should be monitored during follow-up visits. Measurement of angiotensinogen levels may serve as a pharmacodynamic biomarker in clinical practice (not yet part of the standard of care).[37]

Adherence Assessment

The 2025 ACC/AHA guideline emphasizes the assessment of medication adherence before a diagnosis of resistant hypertension is established. Available methods range from self-report questionnaires, such as the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, which have relatively low sensitivity, to pill counts, pharmacy refill records, and electronic monitoring devices, including medication event monitoring system caps, which are considered the noninvasive reference standard. The most sensitive approach is biochemical verification using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to detect antihypertensive drug metabolites in urine or blood; this method has identified nonadherence in approximately 25% to 50% of patients with apparent resistant hypertension. The guideline recommends a multimodal approach that combines patient communication, pharmacy data, and biochemical verification in refractory cases.[1][57]

Toxicity

Thiazide and Loop Diuretic Toxicity

Overdose manifests as severe electrolyte derangements (hypokalemia, hyponatremia, hypochloremic metabolic alkalosis, and hypomagnesemia) and volume depletion. Management is primarily supportive and includes intravenous isotonic saline for volume repletion, intravenous potassium chloride for hypokalemia, and intravenous magnesium sulfate when indicated. Hypertonic saline (3% sodium chloride) may be required for patients with symptomatic severe hyponatremia. No specific antidote is available.[21][42]

Calcium Channel Blocker Toxicity

Calcium channel blocker overdose is a leading cause of cardiovascular drug–related fatality. Dihydropyridine overdose produces severe hypotension with reflex tachycardia; nondihydropyridine overdose (verapamil, diltiazem) causes the lethal triad of bradycardia, conduction block, and negative inotropy progressing to cardiovascular collapse. Hyperglycemia is characteristic of calcium-dependent impairment of insulin secretion.[58] 

Management follows a stepwise approach:

  • Intravenous calcium chloride 10% or calcium gluconate 10%
  • High-dose insulin euglycemic therapy
  • Intravenous vasopressors (norepinephrine first-line for hypotension; epinephrine for combined inotropic and vasopressor support)
  • Intravenous glucagon
  • Intravenous lipid emulsion therapy (20% Intralipid 1.5 mL/kg bolus then infusion) for severe cases, particularly with lipophilic calcium channel blockers (eg, verapamil and amlodipine)
  • Temporary transvenous pacing for refractory bradycardia
  • Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or cardiopulmonary bypass for refractory cardiogenic shock.

Whole-bowel irrigation is indicated for extended-release formulations. Activated charcoal is indicated if administered within 1 to 2 hours of ingestion.[58]

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor and Angiotensin II receptor blocker Toxicity

Overdose of ACE inhibitors or ARBs primarily manifests as hypotension and may also result in hyperkalemia and acute kidney injury. Hypotension is often responsive to intravenous crystalloid administration and Trendelenburg positioning; however, refractory cases may require intravenous vasopressors (norepinephrine or vasopressin). Synthetic angiotensin II (marketed as Giapreza) is a direct physiological antidote available for vasodilatory shock refractory to conventional vasopressors.[59] Hyperkalemia management follows standard protocol. No specific antidote exists for ARB overdose, and management remains largely supportive.[47][48]

β-Blocker Toxicity

β-Blocker overdose causes bradycardia, hypotension, cardiogenic shock, and bronchospasm. Propranolol additionally causes seizures (sodium channel blockade) and QRS prolongation. Sotalol overdose is uniquely dangerous because of QT interval prolongation and torsades de pointes.

Treatment includes:

  • Intravenous glucagon (first-line antidote)
  • High-dose insulin euglycemic therapy
  • Intravenous atropine for symptomatic bradycardia
  • Intravenous vasopressors (such as norepinephrine or epinephrine at high doses to overcome competitive blockade)
  • Temporary transvenous pacing for refractory bradycardia
  • Intravenous lipid emulsion therapy for lipophilic agents (eg, propranolol and carvedilol)
  • Intravenous sodium bicarbonate for QRS widening with propranolol
  • Intravenous magnesium and overdrive pacing for sotalol-induced torsades
  • Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiogenic shock [58]

Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Toxicity

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist toxicity primarily manifests as life-threatening hyperkalemia, which is the leading cause of serious adverse outcomes with this drug class. Hyperkalemia treatment follows standard protocol.[53]

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Effective hypertension management requires a coordinated interprofessional approach involving clinicians, pharmacists, nurses, dietitians, and community health workers. The 2025 ACC/AHA guideline emphasizes team-based care models that use the expertise and scope of practice of each healthcare professional to improve blood pressure control.

Pharmacist-led interventions, including medication therapy management, adherence assessments, and collaborative prescribing, have demonstrated significant reductions in blood pressure in randomized clinical trials. Nurse-led titration protocols using standing orders have also been shown to reduce the time to achieve blood pressure targets. In addition, community health workers and digital health technologies, such as remote blood pressure monitoring, telehealth visits, and text-based reminders, can enhance patient engagement and help address social determinants of health that contribute to hypertension-related disparities.

Medication nonadherence remains the leading cause of apparent treatment-resistant hypertension. Studies using biochemical verification methods have identified nonadherence in approximately 25% to 50% of patients with apparent resistant hypertension. Evidence-based strategies to improve adherence include simplifying treatment regimens through single-pill combinations, reducing pill burden, proactively addressing adverse effects, and engaging patients in shared decision-making.

References


[1]

Writing Committee Members*, Jones DW, Ferdinand KC, Taler SJ, Johnson HM, Shimbo D, Abdalla M, Altieri MM, Bansal N, Bello NA, Bress AP, Carter J, Cohen JB, Collins KJ, Commodore-Mensah Y, Davis LL, Egan B, Khan SS, Lloyd-Jones DM, Melnyk BM, Mistry EA, Ogunniyi MO, Schott SL, Smith SC Jr, Talbot AW, Vongpatanasin W, Watson KE, Whelton PK, Williamson JD. 2025 AHA/ACC/AANP/AAPA/ABC/ACCP/ACPM/AGS/AMA/ASPC/NMA/PCNA/SGIM Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979). 2025 Oct:82(10):e212-e316. doi: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000249. Epub 2025 Aug 14     [PubMed PMID: 40811516]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[2]

Khan SS, Matsushita K, Sang Y, Ballew SH, Grams ME, Surapaneni A, Blaha MJ, Carson AP, Chang AR, Ciemins E, Go AS, Gutierrez OM, Hwang SJ, Jassal SK, Kovesdy CP, Lloyd-Jones DM, Shlipak MG, Palaniappan LP, Sperling L, Virani SS, Tuttle K, Neeland IJ, Chow SL, Rangaswami J, Pencina MJ, Ndumele CE, Coresh J, Chronic Kidney Disease Prognosis Consortium and the American Heart Association Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Science Advisory Group. Development and Validation of the American Heart Association's PREVENT Equations. Circulation. 2024 Feb 6:149(6):430-449. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.067626. Epub 2023 Nov 10     [PubMed PMID: 37947085]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[3]

ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial. Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). JAMA. 2002 Dec 18:288(23):2981-97     [PubMed PMID: 12479763]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[4]

Puttnam R, Davis BR, Pressel SL, Whelton PK, Cushman WC, Louis GT, Margolis KL, Oparil S, Williamson J, Ghosh A, Einhorn PT, Barzilay JI, Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) Collaborative Research Group. Association of 3 Different Antihypertensive Medications With Hip and Pelvic Fracture Risk in Older Adults: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA internal medicine. 2017 Jan 1:177(1):67-76. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.6821. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 27893045]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[5]

Roush GC, Holford TR, Guddati AK. Chlorthalidone compared with hydrochlorothiazide in reducing cardiovascular events: systematic review and network meta-analyses. Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979). 2012 Jun:59(6):1110-7. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.112.191106. Epub 2012 Apr 23     [PubMed PMID: 22526259]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[6]

Ishani A, Leatherman SM, Woods P, Hau C, Klint A, Lew RA, Taylor AA, Glassman PA, Brophy MT, Fiore LD, Ferguson RE, Cushman WC. Design of a pragmatic clinical trial embedded in the Electronic Health Record: The VA's Diuretic Comparison Project. Contemporary clinical trials. 2022 May:116():106754. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106754. Epub 2022 Apr 4     [PubMed PMID: 35390512]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[7]

Beckett NS, Peters R, Fletcher AE, Staessen JA, Liu L, Dumitrascu D, Stoyanovsky V, Antikainen RL, Nikitin Y, Anderson C, Belhani A, Forette F, Rajkumar C, Thijs L, Banya W, Bulpitt CJ, HYVET Study Group. Treatment of hypertension in patients 80 years of age or older. The New England journal of medicine. 2008 May 1:358(18):1887-98. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0801369. Epub 2008 Mar 31     [PubMed PMID: 18378519]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[8]

Patel A, ADVANCE Collaborative Group, MacMahon S, Chalmers J, Neal B, Woodward M, Billot L, Harrap S, Poulter N, Marre M, Cooper M, Glasziou P, Grobbee DE, Hamet P, Heller S, Liu LS, Mancia G, Mogensen CE, Pan CY, Rodgers A, Williams B. Effects of a fixed combination of perindopril and indapamide on macrovascular and microvascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (the ADVANCE trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London, England). 2007 Sep 8:370(9590):829-40     [PubMed PMID: 17765963]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[9]

Dahlöf B, Sever PS, Poulter NR, Wedel H, Beevers DG, Caulfield M, Collins R, Kjeldsen SE, Kristinsson A, McInnes GT, Mehlsen J, Nieminen M, O'Brien E, Ostergren J, ASCOT Investigators. Prevention of cardiovascular events with an antihypertensive regimen of amlodipine adding perindopril as required versus atenolol adding bendroflumethiazide as required, in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Blood Pressure Lowering Arm (ASCOT-BPLA): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London, England). 2005 Sep 10-16:366(9489):895-906     [PubMed PMID: 16154016]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[10]

Weber MA, Jamerson K, Bakris GL, Weir MR, Zappe D, Zhang Y, Dahlof B, Velazquez EJ, Pitt B. Effects of body size and hypertension treatments on cardiovascular event rates: subanalysis of the ACCOMPLISH randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London, England). 2013 Feb 16:381(9866):537-45. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61343-9. Epub 2012 Dec 6     [PubMed PMID: 23219284]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[11]

Elliott WJ, Ram CV. Calcium channel blockers. Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.). 2011 Sep:13(9):687-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2011.00513.x. Epub 2011 Jul 27     [PubMed PMID: 21896151]


[12]

Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators, Yusuf S, Sleight P, Pogue J, Bosch J, Davies R, Dagenais G. Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. The New England journal of medicine. 2000 Jan 20:342(3):145-53     [PubMed PMID: 10639539]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[13]

Fox KM, EURopean trial On reduction of cardiac events with Perindopril in stable coronary Artery disease Investigators. Efficacy of perindopril in reduction of cardiovascular events among patients with stable coronary artery disease: randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial (the EUROPA study). Lancet (London, England). 2003 Sep 6:362(9386):782-8     [PubMed PMID: 13678872]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[14]

Dahlöf B, Devereux RB, Kjeldsen SE, Julius S, Beevers G, de Faire U, Fyhrquist F, Ibsen H, Kristiansson K, Lederballe-Pedersen O, Lindholm LH, Nieminen MS, Omvik P, Oparil S, Wedel H, LIFE Study Group. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol. Lancet (London, England). 2002 Mar 23:359(9311):995-1003     [PubMed PMID: 11937178]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[15]

ONTARGET Investigators, Yusuf S, Teo KK, Pogue J, Dyal L, Copland I, Schumacher H, Dagenais G, Sleight P, Anderson C. Telmisartan, ramipril, or both in patients at high risk for vascular events. The New England journal of medicine. 2008 Apr 10:358(15):1547-59. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0801317. Epub 2008 Mar 31     [PubMed PMID: 18378520]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[16]

Wiysonge CS, Bradley HA, Volmink J, Mayosi BM, Opie LH. Beta-blockers for hypertension. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2017 Jan 20:1(1):CD002003. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002003.pub5. Epub 2017 Jan 20     [PubMed PMID: 28107561]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[17]

Lindholm LH, Carlberg B, Samuelsson O. Should beta blockers remain first choice in the treatment of primary hypertension? A meta-analysis. Lancet (London, England). 2005 Oct 29-Nov 4:366(9496):1545-53     [PubMed PMID: 16257341]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[18]

Wald DS, Law M, Morris JK, Bestwick JP, Wald NJ. Combination therapy versus monotherapy in reducing blood pressure: meta-analysis on 11,000 participants from 42 trials. The American journal of medicine. 2009 Mar:122(3):290-300. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.09.038. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 19272490]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[19]

Jamerson K, Weber MA, Bakris GL, Dahlöf B, Pitt B, Shi V, Hester A, Gupte J, Gatlin M, Velazquez EJ, ACCOMPLISH Trial Investigators. Benazepril plus amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide for hypertension in high-risk patients. The New England journal of medicine. 2008 Dec 4:359(23):2417-28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0806182. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 19052124]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[20]

Williams B, MacDonald TM, Morant S, Webb DJ, Sever P, McInnes G, Ford I, Cruickshank JK, Caulfield MJ, Salsbury J, Mackenzie I, Padmanabhan S, Brown MJ, British Hypertension Society's PATHWAY Studies Group. Spironolactone versus placebo, bisoprolol, and doxazosin to determine the optimal treatment for drug-resistant hypertension (PATHWAY-2): a randomised, double-blind, crossover trial. Lancet (London, England). 2015 Nov 21:386(10008):2059-2068. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00257-3. Epub 2015 Sep 20     [PubMed PMID: 26414968]


[21]

Brater DC. Pharmacology of diuretics. The American journal of the medical sciences. 2000 Jan:319(1):38-50     [PubMed PMID: 10653443]


[22]

Taylor AL, Ziesche S, Yancy C, Carson P, D'Agostino R Jr, Ferdinand K, Taylor M, Adams K, Sabolinski M, Worcel M, Cohn JN, African-American Heart Failure Trial Investigators. Combination of isosorbide dinitrate and hydralazine in blacks with heart failure. The New England journal of medicine. 2004 Nov 11:351(20):2049-57     [PubMed PMID: 15533851]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[23]

Sica DA. Minoxidil: an underused vasodilator for resistant or severe hypertension. Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.). 2004 May:6(5):283-7     [PubMed PMID: 15133413]


[24]

Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial Collaborative Research Group. Diuretic versus alpha-blocker as first-step antihypertensive therapy: final results from the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979). 2003 Sep:42(3):239-46     [PubMed PMID: 12925554]


[25]

Schlaich MP, Bellet M, Weber MA, Danaietash P, Bakris GL, Flack JM, Dreier RF, Sassi-Sayadi M, Haskell LP, Narkiewicz K, Wang JG, PRECISION investigators. Dual endothelin antagonist aprocitentan for resistant hypertension (PRECISION): a multicentre, blinded, randomised, parallel-group, phase 3 trial. Lancet (London, England). 2022 Dec 3:400(10367):1927-1937. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02034-7. Epub 2022 Nov 7     [PubMed PMID: 36356632]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[26]

Azizi M, Amar L, Menard J. Aldosterone synthase inhibition in humans. Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 2013 Jan:28(1):36-43. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfs388. Epub 2012 Oct 8     [PubMed PMID: 23045428]


[27]

Freeman MW, Halvorsen YD, Marshall W, Pater M, Isaacsohn J, Pearce C, Murphy B, Alp N, Srivastava A, Bhatt DL, Brown MJ, BrigHTN Investigators. Phase 2 Trial of Baxdrostat for Treatment-Resistant Hypertension. The New England journal of medicine. 2023 Feb 2:388(5):395-405. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2213169. Epub 2022 Nov 7     [PubMed PMID: 36342143]


[28]

Flack JM, Azizi M, Brown JM, Dwyer JP, Fronczek J, Jones ESW, Olsson DS, Perl S, Shibata H, Wang JG, Wilderäng U, Wittes J, Williams B, BaxHTN Investigators. Efficacy and Safety of Baxdrostat in Uncontrolled and Resistant Hypertension. The New England journal of medicine. 2025 Oct 9:393(14):1363-1374. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2507109. Epub 2025 Aug 30     [PubMed PMID: 40888730]


[29]

Saxena M, Laffin L, Borghi C, Fernandez Fernandez B, Ghali JK, Kopjar B, Polu K, Roger SD, Slingsby BT, Strutz F, Vogt L, Weir MR, Rodman D, Launch-HTN Investigators. Lorundrostat in Participants With Uncontrolled Hypertension and Treatment-Resistant Hypertension: The Launch-HTN Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2025 Aug 5:334(5):409-418. doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.9413. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 40587141]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[30]

Agarwal R, Kolkhof P, Bakris G, Bauersachs J, Haller H, Wada T, Zannad F. Steroidal and non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in cardiorenal medicine. European heart journal. 2021 Jan 7:42(2):152-161. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa736. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 33099609]


[31]

Bakris GL, Agarwal R, Anker SD, Pitt B, Ruilope LM, Rossing P, Kolkhof P, Nowack C, Schloemer P, Joseph A, Filippatos G, FIDELIO-DKD Investigators. Effect of Finerenone on Chronic Kidney Disease Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes. The New England journal of medicine. 2020 Dec 3:383(23):2219-2229. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2025845. Epub 2020 Oct 23     [PubMed PMID: 33264825]


[32]

Pitt B, Filippatos G, Agarwal R, Anker SD, Bakris GL, Rossing P, Joseph A, Kolkhof P, Nowack C, Schloemer P, Ruilope LM, FIGARO-DKD Investigators. Cardiovascular Events with Finerenone in Kidney Disease and Type 2 Diabetes. The New England journal of medicine. 2021 Dec 9:385(24):2252-2263. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2110956. Epub 2021 Aug 28     [PubMed PMID: 34449181]


[33]

Solomon SD, McMurray JJV, Vaduganathan M, Claggett B, Jhund PS, Desai AS, Henderson AD, Lam CSP, Pitt B, Senni M, Shah SJ, Voors AA, Zannad F, Abidin IZ, Alcocer-Gamba MA, Atherton JJ, Bauersachs J, Chang-Sheng M, Chiang CE, Chioncel O, Chopra V, Comin-Colet J, Filippatos G, Fonseca C, Gajos G, Goland S, Goncalvesova E, Kang S, Katova T, Kosiborod MN, Latkovskis G, Lee AP, Linssen GCM, Llamas-Esperón G, Mareev V, Martinez FA, Melenovský V, Merkely B, Nodari S, Petrie MC, Saldarriaga CI, Saraiva JFK, Sato N, Schou M, Sharma K, Troughton R, Udell JA, Ukkonen H, Vardeny O, Verma S, von Lewinski D, Voronkov L, Yilmaz MB, Zieroth S, Lay-Flurrie J, van Gameren I, Amarante F, Kolkhof P, Viswanathan P, FINEARTS-HF Committees and Investigators. Finerenone in Heart Failure with Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction. The New England journal of medicine. 2024 Oct 24:391(16):1475-1485. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2407107. Epub 2024 Sep 1     [PubMed PMID: 39225278]


[34]

McMurray JJ, Packer M, Desai AS, Gong J, Lefkowitz MP, Rizkala AR, Rouleau JL, Shi VC, Solomon SD, Swedberg K, Zile MR, PARADIGM-HF Investigators and Committees. Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure. The New England journal of medicine. 2014 Sep 11:371(11):993-1004. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1409077. Epub 2014 Aug 30     [PubMed PMID: 25176015]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[35]

Williams B, Cockcroft JR, Kario K, Zappe DH, Brunel PC, Wang Q, Guo W. Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Olmesartan on Central Hemodynamics in the Elderly With Systolic Hypertension: The PARAMETER Study. Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979). 2017 Mar:69(3):411-420. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.08556. Epub 2017 Jan 16     [PubMed PMID: 28093466]


[36]

Kinguchi S, Ishiga K, Wakui H, Azushima K, Kanaoka T, Kobayashi Y, Haze T, Hirawa N, Tamura K. Switching From ARBs to Sacubitril/Valsartan Safely Improves 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Patients With Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease. American journal of hypertension. 2025 May 15:38(6):380-388. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpaf028. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 40063419]


[37]

Desai AS, Webb DJ, Taubel J, Casey S, Cheng Y, Robbie GJ, Foster D, Huang SA, Rhyee S, Sweetser MT, Bakris GL. Zilebesiran, an RNA Interference Therapeutic Agent for Hypertension. The New England journal of medicine. 2023 Jul 20:389(3):228-238. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2208391. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 37467498]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[38]

Bakris GL, Saxena M, Gupta A, Chalhoub F, Lee J, Stiglitz D, Makarova N, Goyal N, Guo W, Zappe D, Desai AS, KARDIA-1 Study Group. RNA Interference With Zilebesiran for Mild to Moderate Hypertension: The KARDIA-1 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2024 Mar 5:331(9):740-749. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.0728. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 38363577]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[39]

Desai AS, Karns AD, Badariene J, Aswad A, Neutel JM, Kazi F, Park W, Stiglitz D, Makarova N, Havasi A, Zappe DH, Saxena M, KARDIA-2 Study Group. Add-On Treatment With Zilebesiran for Inadequately Controlled Hypertension: The KARDIA-2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2025 Jul 1:334(1):46-55. doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.6681. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 40434761]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[40]

Muskiet MH, van Raalte DH, van Bommel EJ, Smits MM, Tonneijck L. Understanding EMPA-REG OUTCOME. The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology. 2015 Dec:3(12):928-9. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00424-6. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 26590679]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[41]

American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. Introduction and Methodology: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025. Diabetes care. 2025 Jan 1:48(1 Suppl 1):S1-S5. doi: 10.2337/dc25-SINT. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 39651982]


[42]

Ellison DH, Felker GM. Diuretic Treatment in Heart Failure. The New England journal of medicine. 2017 Nov 16:377(20):1964-1975. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1703100. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 29141174]


[43]

Sica DA. Current concepts of pharmacotherapy in hypertension: thiazide-type diuretics: ongoing considerations on mechanism of action. Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.). 2004 Nov:6(11):661-4     [PubMed PMID: 15538103]


[44]

Duarte JD, Cooper-DeHoff RM. Mechanisms for blood pressure lowering and metabolic effects of thiazide and thiazide-like diuretics. Expert review of cardiovascular therapy. 2010 Jun:8(6):793-802. doi: 10.1586/erc.10.27. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 20528637]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[45]

Roush GC, Sica DA. Diuretics for Hypertension: A Review and Update. American journal of hypertension. 2016 Oct:29(10):1130-7. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpw030. Epub 2016 Apr 5     [PubMed PMID: 27048970]


[46]

Toal CB, Meredith PA, Elliott HL. Long-acting dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers and sympathetic nervous system activity in hypertension: a literature review comparing amlodipine and nifedipine GITS. Blood pressure. 2012 Jul:21 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):3-10. doi: 10.3109/08037051.2012.690615. Epub 2012 Jul 5     [PubMed PMID: 22762301]


[47]

Messerli FH, Bangalore S, Bavishi C, Rimoldi SF. Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors in Hypertension: To Use or Not to Use? Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2018 Apr 3:71(13):1474-1482. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.01.058. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 29598869]


[48]

Izzo JL Jr, Weir MR. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.). 2011 Sep:13(9):667-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2011.00508.x. Epub 2011 Jul 18     [PubMed PMID: 21896148]


[49]

Burnier M, Brunner HR. Angiotensin II receptor antagonists. Lancet (London, England). 2000 Feb 19:355(9204):637-45     [PubMed PMID: 10696996]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[50]

Lindholm LH, Ibsen H, Dahlöf B, Devereux RB, Beevers G, de Faire U, Fyhrquist F, Julius S, Kjeldsen SE, Kristiansson K, Lederballe-Pedersen O, Nieminen MS, Omvik P, Oparil S, Wedel H, Aurup P, Edelman J, Snapinn S, LIFE Study Group. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol. Lancet (London, England). 2002 Mar 23:359(9311):1004-10     [PubMed PMID: 11937179]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[51]

Frishman WH. beta-Adrenergic blockers: a 50-year historical perspective. American journal of therapeutics. 2008 Nov-Dec:15(6):565-76. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e318188bdca. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 19127141]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[52]

Poirier L, Tobe SW. Contemporary use of β-blockers: clinical relevance of subclassification. The Canadian journal of cardiology. 2014 May:30(5 Suppl):S9-S15. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2013.12.001. Epub 2013 Dec 4     [PubMed PMID: 24684855]


[53]

Kolkhof P, Bärfacker L. 30 YEARS OF THE MINERALOCORTICOID RECEPTOR: Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists: 60 years of research and development. The Journal of endocrinology. 2017 Jul:234(1):T125-T140. doi: 10.1530/JOE-16-0600. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 28634268]


[54]

Handler J. Hydralazine-induced lupus erythematosis. Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.). 2012 Feb:14(2):133-136. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2011.00573.x. Epub 2011 Dec 9     [PubMed PMID: 22277146]


[55]

Sica DA. Centrally acting antihypertensive agents: an update. Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.). 2007 May:9(5):399-405     [PubMed PMID: 17485976]


[56]

Mackenzie IS, Rogers A, Poulter NR, Williams B, Brown MJ, Webb DJ, Ford I, Rorie DA, Guthrie G, Grieve JWK, Pigazzani F, Rothwell PM, Young R, McConnachie A, Struthers AD, Lang CC, MacDonald TM, TIME Study Group. Cardiovascular outcomes in adults with hypertension with evening versus morning dosing of usual antihypertensives in the UK (TIME study): a prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint clinical trial. Lancet (London, England). 2022 Oct 22:400(10361):1417-1425. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01786-X. Epub 2022 Oct 11     [PubMed PMID: 36240838]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[57]

Tomaszewski M, White C, Patel P, Masca N, Damani R, Hepworth J, Samani NJ, Gupta P, Madira W, Stanley A, Williams B. High rates of non-adherence to antihypertensive treatment revealed by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HP LC-MS/MS) urine analysis. Heart (British Cardiac Society). 2014 Jun:100(11):855-61. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-305063. Epub 2014 Apr 2     [PubMed PMID: 24694797]


[58]

Goldfine CE, Troger A, Erickson TB, Chai PR. Beta-blocker and calcium-channel blocker toxicity: current evidence on evaluation and management. European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care. 2024 Feb 16:13(2):247-253. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuad138. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 37976176]


[59]

Khalique SC, Ferguson N. Angiotensin II (Giapreza): A Distinct Mechanism for the Treatment of Vasodilatory Shock. Cardiology in review. 2019 May/Jun:27(3):167-169. doi: 10.1097/CRD.0000000000000247. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 30601161]