Introduction
Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) is characterized by a triad of micrognathia, posterior-inferior displacement of the tongue base (glossoptosis), and airway obstruction.[1] According to the systematic review and meta-analysis by Tan et al (2024), PRS has a global birth prevalence of approximately 9.5 per 100,000 live births (95% CI 7.1–12.1).[2] PRS can occur in isolation but is more commonly associated with syndromes, eg, fetal alcohol syndrome, Stickler syndrome, velocardiofacial syndrome, and Treacher-Collins syndrome.[3][4] At birth, neonates primarily present with signs of respiratory distress (stridor, retractions, and cyanosis); some may also exhibit feeding difficulties, gastroesophageal reflux, aspiration, and failure to thrive.[5][6]
A sequence is defined as a pattern of congenital anomalies resulting from a single primary developmental defect. In PRS, micrognathia is the initiating event that occurs during development that leads to a cascade of secondary anomalies, eg, glossoptosis and cleft palate. The hypoplastic mandible displaces the tongue posteriorly into the nasopharynx, thereby preventing fusion of the palatal shelves. This results in a cleft palate of varying severity. In addition to cleft palate, glossoptosis contributes to airway obstruction and, in severe cases, obstructive sleep apnea.[7]
In approximately 70% of PRS cases, prone or lateral positioning relieves airway obstruction; however, if desaturation persists, a nasopharyngeal airway may be placed to bypass the upper airway obstruction.[8][9] Patients with mild airway obstruction managed conservatively remain at risk for failure to thrive due to feeding difficulties, gastroesophageal reflux, and aspiration. In such cases, placement of a gastrostomy tube until adequate catch-up growth is achieved may help prevent these complications. In cases of acute severe airway obstruction, emergent tracheostomy is required to bypass the compromised airway.[10]
Following initial stabilization, procedures, eg, tongue–lip adhesion and mandibular distraction osteogenesis, may be performed to correct glossoptosis, lengthen the mandible, and relieve airway obstruction. These interventions may also be necessary in patients initially managed conservatively who fail to achieve adequate catch-up growth.[11][12] Patients often require palatoplasty to correct the palatal defect, improve feeding, and facilitate normal speech development.
These procedures require anesthetic management with general anesthesia. Anesthesiology-assisted sedation may also be necessary for patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT).
Issues of Concern
Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Search engine and full access to all medical articles
10 free questions in your specialty
Free CME/CE Activities
Free daily question in your email
Save favorite articles to your dashboard
Emails offering discounts
Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care
Issues of Concern
PRS poses numerous challenges to anesthesiologists. The airway is often difficult to ventilate and intubate due to craniofacial dysmorphology. Maintaining an adequate seal with a facemask can be challenging because of midface hypoplasia and retrognathia/micrognathia. Direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation are typically difficult during infancy but generally become more manageable with age and mandibular growth. Airway obstruction in patients with PRS can occur at the level of the oropharynx and hypopharynx, respectively, due to glossoptosis and epiglottic collapse. In patients with concurrent laryngomalacia and/or subglottic stenosis, airway obstruction may also occur at the laryngeal level.[13]
Postoperatively, patients with PRS are at increased risk of spontaneous airway collapse. This may occur due to preexisting airway obstruction, with possible obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) exacerbated by residual anesthetic effects, airway edema from instrumentation, and increased opioid sensitivity. Patients may develop paradoxical breathing patterns, intercostal indrawing, subcostal and sternal retractions, and tracheal tug.[14]
Neonates and infants with PRS and associated OSA with chronic hypoxemia exhibit heightened opioid sensitivity due to upregulation of opioid receptors in the brainstem. Patients with severe airway obstruction have significantly reduced opioid requirements and require careful dose titration.[15] Feeding difficulties, swallowing disorders, and coexisting gastroesophageal reflux are frequently complicated by bronchial microaspiration and pulmonary infections.[16] Therefore, aspiration precautions should be implemented before elective procedures. Additionally, patients with PRS are often malnourished and have a high prevalence of failure to thrive.[17]
Clinical Significance
Preanesthetic Assessment
Neonates and infants presenting with PRS pose significant challenges to anesthesia clinicians during the intraoperative and postoperative periods. Preoperatively, anesthesiologists should obtain a detailed birth history, including a history of NICU admission for airway support, history of OSA, recent upper respiratory infections, features suggestive of reflux and aspiration, and details of prior anesthetic interventions.
A comprehensive physical examination, with an emphasis on airway evaluation and cardiopulmonary assessment, is essential for formulating an appropriate anesthetic management plan. Airway evaluation should include assessment of mouth opening, presence of cleft palate, degree of airway obstruction, severity of micrognathia, and the presence of other craniofacial skeletal abnormalities. In addition, identifying patients with features of OSA, as this helps predict intraoperative and postoperative airway complications and identify those who may not tolerate the supine position. Physical examination should include measuring oxygen saturation, heart rate, respiratory rate, and blood pressure.
Preoperative workup should include a complete blood count and other investigations guided by associated comorbidities, including serum electrolytes, renal function tests, flexible nasal endoscopy and laryngoscopy, chest radiography, and computed tomography (CT). If PRS is associated with other syndromes, a preoperative echocardiogram should be performed, particularly if a cardiac murmur is present.[18]
An emerging adjunct to preoperative planning is the use of patient-specific 3D-printed airway simulators derived from CT imaging data. A 2024 study demonstrated that these models enable anesthesiologists to visualize individual airway morphology, select appropriate intubation equipment, and rehearse intubation strategies before entering the operating room, a development of particular value in anatomically challenging PRS airways.[19]
Induction and Airway Management
Anesthesia practitioners should anticipate difficulty with ventilation, oxygenation, and intubation. Intubation may be performed with or without sedation and general anesthesia. The primary objective in managing the anticipated difficult pediatric airway is to maintain spontaneous ventilation under sedation or general anesthesia. Compared with no sedation or anesthesia, the use of anesthesia increases the success rate of first-attempt intubation and reduces both the number of attempts and the incidence of complications.[20]
Upper airway obstruction is common in syndromic children and may be alleviated with a 2-handed jaw thrust and airway adjuncts, eg, an oropharyngeal airway, nasopharyngeal airway, or laryngeal mask airway (LMA). Otorhinolaryngology support should be readily available for emergent tracheostomy.
European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care and British Journal of Anesthesia 2024 Guidelines
The 2024 European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care and British Journal of Anesthesia guidelines provide the following recommendations, each directly applicable to PRS airway management:
- Videolaryngoscopy: A videolaryngoscope with an age-appropriate standard blade is recommended as the first-line intubation technique in neonates and infants, superseding direct laryngoscopy as the default approach. Videolaryngoscopy offers improved glottic visualization, enables team-based supervision of intubation attempts, and has been shown to increase first-attempt success rates in the pediatric difficult-airway population. When a hyperangulated blade is used, a preshaped stylet should be utilized to facilitate endotracheal tube passage through the acutely angled view.[20]
- Apnoeic oxygenation: The provision of supplemental oxygen during intubation attempts, via nasal cannula, transnasal humidified rapid-insufflation ventilatory exchange (THRIVE), or pharyngeal insufflation, extends safe apnea time and reduces the risk of desaturation during laryngoscopy.[20]
- Limiting intubation attempts: Each failed intubation attempt contributes to progressive airway edema and trauma, thereby increasing the difficulty of subsequent attempts. If the initial technique fails, the operator, device, or approach should be modified. After 2 to 3 unsuccessful attempts, the strategy should escalate to placement of a supraglottic airway for rescue ventilation and oxygenation, and the team should explicitly consider whether to proceed with an alternative intubation strategy or awaken the patient.[20]
- Postextubation respiratory support: High-flow nasal oxygenation (HFNC), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), or nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation should be considered for postextubation respiratory support in at-risk neonates.[20]
Airway Technique Selection
The following airway techniques may be indicated in the following settings:
- Fiberoptic intubation: Flexible fiberoptic intubation, whether performed awake under topical anesthesia or asleep while preserving spontaneous ventilation, remains the gold standard for known or anticipated severe airway difficulty. Flexible fiberoptic intubation is particularly indicated when nasal intubation is required (as in tongue–lip adhesion or mandibular distraction osteogenesis procedures) and when airway anatomy is too distorted for effective videolaryngoscopy.[21]
- Hybrid videolaryngoscopy with fiberoptic bronchoscopy: A combined approach that uses videolaryngoscopy for indirect glottic visualization while advancing a fiberoptic bronchoscope through the glottis to guide endotracheal tube placement has demonstrated efficacy in the Pediatric Difficult Intubation Registry.[22]
- Supraglottic airway as an intubation conduit: A supraglottic airway can serve as both a rescue ventilation device and a conduit for fiberoptic-guided or blind intubation. In resource-limited settings where fiberoptic bronchoscopes are unavailable, intubation with devices (eg, an i-gel or Air-Q) using an appropriately sized endotracheal tube has been reported to be an effective strategy in PRS neonates.[23][Shah PJ et al. Airway Management in a Neonate with Pierre–Robin Syndrome: Challenges for the Anesthesiologist. 2024]
While using direct laryngoscopy for intubation, the right paraglossal approach is more effective than the standard midline technique. However, this approach can make endotracheal tube passage more challenging, and a bougie may be required to facilitate intubation.[23] Given the 63% failure rate of direct laryngoscopy in PRS neonates reported by Marston et al, it should not be considered a reliable first-line technique in this population.[21]
Anesthesia Agents
For awake fiberoptic intubation in neonates, intravenous access should ideally be secured before induction. The pharynx and oral cavity are anesthetized using topical lidocaine (2%) via atomizer and jelly. The total lidocaine dose should be limited to 4 to 5 mg/kg. A vagolytic agent (atropine or glycopyrrolate) is administered to prevent bradycardia and to act as an antisialagogue. If intubating orally, an intubating supraglottic device may be helpful. Upon visualization of the vocal cords, an intravenous induction agent may be administered. A neuromuscular blocking agent is then administered before advancing the scope through the vocal cords to reduce the risk of laryngospasm.[18]
Anesthesia may be induced with either volatile or intravenous agents (eg, propofol). Sevoflurane is the most commonly used volatile agent in pediatric practice and is recommended for the management of the difficult airway. Isoflurane may also be used as an alternative. Desflurane should be avoided in patients with bronchial hyperreactivity, as it may precipitate laryngospasm, coughing, and increased airway secretions.
In addition to inhalational agents, anesthesia may be maintained using total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and alpha-2 agonists (eg, dexmedetomidine), which can reduce opioid requirements and provide both analgesic and sedative effects. TIVA may also decrease the incidence of emergence agitation.[24][25] The key advantage of TIVA in PRS is the ability to achieve adequate depth of anesthesia while relatively preserving respiratory drive (via dexmedetomidine), thereby minimizing opioid exposure in a population with heightened opioid sensitivity.[26][27]
Dexmedetomidine is a centrally acting alpha-2 adrenergic agonist that decreases central sympathetic outflow. A notable characteristic of dexmedetomidine is preservation of respiratory drive. Dexmedetomidine is associated with a low incidence of apnea, respiratory depression, and airway obstruction, making it particularly advantageous in children prone to airway collapse. These properties, combined with a relatively short half-life, make it a useful sedative agent for ambulatory pediatric procedures, eg, CT and MRI.[26]
Ketamine causes minimal respiratory depression by maintaining a near-normal ventilatory response to carbon dioxide; therefore, this agent is well-suited for procedures performed under sedation. Ketamine also produces bronchodilation and mitigates intubation-induced bronchospasm. However, ketamine increases airway secretions; therefore, antisialagogues should be administered prophylactically before its use.[25]
Intraoperative Monitoring and Extubation
Intraoperative monitoring should include quantitative neuromuscular monitoring and temperature monitoring (rectal or nasal), in addition to standard monitoring with electrocardiography (ECG), noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP), end-tidal carbon dioxide, and pulse oximetry. Complete reversal of neuromuscular blockade with appropriate monitoring, followed by awake extubation, should be ensured. A nasopharyngeal airway may be inserted before extubation to reduce the risk of postoperative airway obstruction.
Prolonged surgical duration, pressure exerted on the base of the tongue by retractors, and airway edema may exacerbate preexisting airway obstruction, making these patients particularly susceptible to postoperative respiratory complications.[28] The risk of postoperative complications may be reduced by simple maneuvers, eg, neck extension and jaw thrust, or by the use of nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal airways. Postoperatively, nursing the child in a lateral position with the neck extended may further help reduce complications.[14]
Following extubation, high-flow nasal oxygenation, CPAP, or nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation should be instituted as clinically indicated.[20] Additionally, to prevent postoperative respiratory obstruction, nonopioid analgesics, regional anesthesia techniques, and local infiltration should be considered.
Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes
PRS is a congenital craniofacial disorder characterized by micrognathia, glossoptosis, and upper airway obstruction, frequently associated with cleft palate and syndromic conditions such as Stickler and Treacher-Collins syndromes. Infants commonly present with respiratory distress, feeding difficulties, aspiration, gastroesophageal reflux, obstructive sleep apnea, and failure to thrive. Airway compromise results from posterior displacement of the tongue and may worsen during anesthesia or sedation because of difficult mask ventilation, intubation challenges, airway edema, and heightened opioid sensitivity. Evidence-based management includes prone or lateral positioning, nasopharyngeal airway placement, videolaryngoscopy, fiberoptic intubation, opioid-sparing anesthetic strategies, and postoperative respiratory support with high-flow nasal oxygen or CPAP. Severe cases may require tongue-lip adhesion, mandibular distraction osteogenesis, or tracheostomy to relieve obstruction and support growth and development.
Interprofessional collaboration improves patient-centered outcomes by promoting coordinated airway planning, preventing complications, and enabling timely interventions. Pediatricians, anesthesiologists, surgeons, neonatologists, advanced practitioners, nurses, pharmacists, respiratory therapists, and otorhinolaryngologists each contribute to comprehensive perioperative care through shared decision-making and structured communication. Clinicians collaborate to assess airway severity, optimize nutrition, manage aspiration risk, and determine appropriate surgical or anesthetic strategies. Pharmacists assist with opioid dose adjustment and medication safety, while nursing staff provide feeding support, postoperative monitoring, parent education, and early recognition of respiratory compromise.[29] Effective teamwork, leadership, situational awareness, and standardized communication strategies reduce preventable complications, improve safety, and support long-term developmental outcomes.[30]
Acknowledgment of Assistance
The author acknowledges the assistance of Claude AI and ChatGPT (OpenAI) in reference formatting, literature review, refining the language, and improving the clarity and readability of the manuscript. All scientific content, references, and conclusions are the responsibility of the author.
References
Mackay DR. Controversies in the diagnosis and management of the Robin sequence. The Journal of craniofacial surgery. 2011 Mar:22(2):415-20. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182074799. Epub [PubMed PMID: 21403570]
Wright M, Cortina-Borja M, Knowles R, Urquhart DS. Global birth prevalence of Robin sequence in live-born infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society. 2023 Dec 31:32(170):. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0133-2023. Epub 2023 Dec 6 [PubMed PMID: 38056889]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceKarempelis P, Hagen M, Morrell N, Roby BB. Associated syndromes in patients with Pierre Robin Sequence. International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. 2020 Apr:131():109842. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.109842. Epub 2019 Dec 30 [PubMed PMID: 31927149]
Giudice A, Barone S, Belhous K, Morice A, Soupre V, Bennardo F, Boddaert N, Vazquez MP, Abadie V, Picard A. Pierre Robin sequence: A comprehensive narrative review of the literature over time. Journal of stomatology, oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2018 Nov:119(5):419-428. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2018.05.002. Epub 2018 May 17 [PubMed PMID: 29777780]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceGangopadhyay N, Mendonca DA, Woo AS. Pierre robin sequence. Seminars in plastic surgery. 2012 May:26(2):76-82. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1320065. Epub [PubMed PMID: 23633934]
Marcellus L. The infant with Pierre Robin sequence: review and implications for nursing practice. Journal of pediatric nursing. 2001 Feb:16(1):23-34 [PubMed PMID: 11247521]
Prows CA, Bender PL. Beyond Pierre Robin sequence. Neonatal network : NN. 1999 Aug:18(5):13-9 [PubMed PMID: 10693474]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceAnderson KD, Cole A, Chuo CB, Slator R. Home management of upper airway obstruction in Pierre Robin sequence using a nasopharyngeal airway. The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association. 2007 May:44(3):269-73 [PubMed PMID: 17477753]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceWhitaker IS, Koron S, Oliver DW, Jani P. Effective management of the airway in the Pierre Robin syndrome using a modified nasopharyngeal tube and pulse oximetry. The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery. 2003 Aug:41(4):272-4 [PubMed PMID: 12946675]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceLi WY, Poon A, Courtemanche D, Verchere C, Robertson S, Bucevska M, Malic C, Arneja JS. Airway Management in Pierre Robin Sequence: The Vancouver Classification. Plastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.). 2017 Feb:25(1):14-20. doi: 10.1177/2292550317693814. Epub 2017 Mar 10 [PubMed PMID: 29026807]
Frawley G, Espenell A, Howe P, Shand J, Heggie A. Anesthetic implications of infants with mandibular hypoplasia treated with mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Paediatric anaesthesia. 2013 Apr:23(4):342-8. doi: 10.1111/pan.12049. Epub 2012 Oct 9 [PubMed PMID: 23043528]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceRANDALL P, KROGMAN WM, JAHINS S. PIERRE ROBIN AND THE SYNDROME THAT BEARS HIS NAME. The Cleft palate journal. 1965 Jul:36():237-46 [PubMed PMID: 14310241]
Sher AE. Mechanisms of airway obstruction in Robin sequence: implications for treatment. The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association. 1992 May:29(3):224-31 [PubMed PMID: 1591255]
Pawar D. Common post-operative complications in children. Indian journal of anaesthesia. 2012 Sep:56(5):496-501. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.103970. Epub [PubMed PMID: 23293390]
Brown KA, Laferrière A, Moss IR. Recurrent hypoxemia in young children with obstructive sleep apnea is associated with reduced opioid requirement for analgesia. Anesthesiology. 2004 Apr:100(4):806-10; discussion 5A [PubMed PMID: 15087614]
Monasterio FO, Molina F, Berlanga F, López ME, Ahumada H, Takenaga RH, Ysunza A. Swallowing disorders in Pierre Robin sequence: its correction by distraction. The Journal of craniofacial surgery. 2004 Nov:15(6):934-41 [PubMed PMID: 15547378]
Pandya AN, Boorman JG. Failure to thrive in babies with cleft lip and palate. British journal of plastic surgery. 2001 Sep:54(6):471-5 [PubMed PMID: 11513506]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceCladis F, Kumar A, Grunwaldt L, Otteson T, Ford M, Losee JE. Pierre Robin Sequence: a perioperative review. Anesthesia and analgesia. 2014 Aug:119(2):400-412. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000301. Epub [PubMed PMID: 25046788]
Mao Y, Liu L, Zhong J, Qin P, Ma R, Zuo M, Zhang L, Yang L. Tracheal intubation in patients with Pierre Robin sequence: development, application, and clinical value based on a 3-dimensional printed simulator. Frontiers in physiology. 2023:14():1292523. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1292523. Epub 2024 Feb 1 [PubMed PMID: 38374871]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceDisma N, Asai T, Cools E, Cronin A, Engelhardt T, Fiadjoe J, Fuchs A, Garcia-Marcinkiewicz A, Habre W, Heath C, Johansen M, Kaufmann J, Kleine-Brueggeney M, Kovatsis PG, Kranke P, Lusardi AC, Matava C, Peyton J, Riva T, Romero CS, von Ungern-Sternberg B, Veyckemans F, Afshari A, and airway guidelines groups of the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) and the British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA). Airway management in neonates and infants: European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care and British Journal of Anaesthesia joint guidelines. European journal of anaesthesiology. 2024 Jan 1:41(1):3-23. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001928. Epub 2023 Dec 13 [PubMed PMID: 38018248]
Marston AP, Lander TA, Tibesar RJ, Sidman JD. Airway management for intubation in newborns with Pierre Robin sequence. The Laryngoscope. 2012 Jun:122(6):1401-4. doi: 10.1002/lary.23260. Epub 2012 Mar 27 [PubMed PMID: 22460229]
Stein ML, Park RS, Kiss EE, Adams HD, Burjek NE, Peyton J, Szmuk P, Staffa SJ, Fiadjoe JE, Kovatsis PG, Olomu PN, PeDI Collaborative Investigators. Efficacy of a hybrid technique of simultaneous videolaryngoscopy with flexible bronchoscopy in children with difficult direct laryngoscopy in the Pediatric Difficult Intubation Registry. Anaesthesia. 2023 Sep:78(9):1093-1101. doi: 10.1111/anae.16049. Epub 2023 Jun 15 [PubMed PMID: 37322572]
Semjen F, Bordes M, Cros AM. Intubation of infants with Pierre Robin syndrome: the use of the paraglossal approach combined with a gum-elastic bougie in six consecutive cases. Anaesthesia. 2008 Feb:63(2):147-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05097.x. Epub [PubMed PMID: 18211445]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceMahmoud M, Mason KP. Dexmedetomidine: review, update, and future considerations of paediatric perioperative and periprocedural applications and limitations. British journal of anaesthesia. 2015 Aug:115(2):171-82. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev226. Epub [PubMed PMID: 26170346]
Green SM, Roback MG, Kennedy RM, Krauss B. Clinical practice guideline for emergency department ketamine dissociative sedation: 2011 update. Annals of emergency medicine. 2011 May:57(5):449-61. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.11.030. Epub 2011 Jan 21 [PubMed PMID: 21256625]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceJung SM. Drug selection for sedation and general anesthesia in children undergoing ambulatory magnetic resonance imaging. Yeungnam University journal of medicine. 2020 Jul:37(3):159-168. doi: 10.12701/yujm.2020.00171. Epub 2020 Apr 17 [PubMed PMID: 32299181]
Haque AF, Patel V, Bradford V. A Challenge in Perioperative Anesthetic Management: A Case Report of an Infant With Concurrent Ullrich Congenital Muscular Dystrophy and Pierre Robin Sequence. Cureus. 2025 Apr:17(4):e82170. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82170. Epub 2025 Apr 13 [PubMed PMID: 40364884]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceDell'Oste C, Savron F, Pelizzo G, Sarti A. Acute airway obstruction in an infant with Pierre Robin syndrome after palatoplasty. Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2004 Jul:48(6):787-9 [PubMed PMID: 15196114]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceWahr JA, Abernathy JH 3rd, Lazarra EH, Keebler JR, Wall MH, Lynch I, Wolfe R, Cooper RL. Medication safety in the operating room: literature and expert-based recommendations. British journal of anaesthesia. 2017 Jan:118(1):32-43. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew379. Epub 2016 Dec 30 [PubMed PMID: 28039240]
Manser T. Teamwork and patient safety in dynamic domains of healthcare: a review of the literature. Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2009 Feb:53(2):143-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01717.x. Epub [PubMed PMID: 19032571]